Normes d'imagerie et de fréquence subjective pour 1 760 mots monosyllabiques de la langue française

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 139-149

  Gonthier, Isabelle ^a   Desrochers, Alain ^a   Thompson, Glenn ^a   Landry, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

French words; Imageability norms; Monosyllabic words; Subjective frequency norms

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; ONTARIO; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67849088637     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0015386     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Arabia-Guidet, C., Chevrie-Muller, C., & Louis, M. (2000). Fréquence d'occurrence des mots dans les livres d'enfants de 3 à 5 ans. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 50, 3-16.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. London: Kluwer.
3. Balota, D., & Chumbley, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
4. Baluch,B.,&Besner,D.(2001).Basicprocessesinreading: Semanticsaffectsspeedednamingofhigh-frequencywordsinanalphabeticscript. CanadianJournalofExperimentalPsychology,55,63-69.(Pubitemid33599992)
5. Baudot, J. (1992). Fréquence d'utilisation des mots en français écrit contemporain. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
6. Beauchemin, N., Martel, P., & Théoret, M. (1992). Dictionnaire de fréquence des mots du français parlé au Québec. New York: Lang.
7. Benjafield, J., & Muckenheim, R. (1989). Dates of entry and measures of imagery, concreteness, goodness, and familiarity for 1,046 words sampled from the Oxford English Dictionary. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 31-52.
8. Bird,H.,Franklin,S.,&Howard,D. 2001Ageofacquisitionandimageabilityratingsforalargesetofwords, includingverbsandfunctionwords.BehaviorResearchMethods,Instruments, &Computers,33,73-79.(Pubitemid33597337)
9. Bonin, P., Méot, A., Aubert, L., Malardier, N., Niedenthal, P., & CapelleToczek, M. C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots. L'Année Psychologique, 103, 683-721.
10. Carroll, J. B. (1967). On sampling from a log normal model of wordfrequency distribution. In H. Kučera & W. N. Francis (Eds.), Computational analysis of present-day American English (pp. 406-427). Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
11. Coltheart,M.,Rastle,K.,Perry,C.,Ziegler,J.,&Langdon,R.(2001).DRC: Adualroutecascadedmodelofvisualwordrecognitionandreadingaloud. PsychologicalReview,108,204-256.(Pubitemid33604132)
12. Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., & Keating, C. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 1-12.
13. Coltheart, V., & Winograd, E. (1986). Word imagery but not age of acquisition affects episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 14, 174-179.
14. Cortese,M.J.,Simpson,G.B.,&Woolsey,S.(1997). Effectsofassociationandimageabilityonphonologicalmapping. PsychonomicBulletin&Review,4,226-231.(Pubitemid127459389)
15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
16. de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 842-845.
17. Denis, M. (1975). Représentation imagée et activité de mémorisation. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
18. Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
19. Denis, M. (1982). On figurative components of mental representations. In F. Flix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 65-71). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Denis, M. (1983). Valeurs d'imagerie et composition sémantique : Analyse de deux échantillons de substantifs. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 175-202.
21. Denis, M. (1984). Propriétés figuratives et non-figurative dans l'analyse de concept. L'Année Psychologique, 84, 327-345.
22. Denis, M. (1989). Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
23. Desrochers,A.,&Bergeron,M.(2000).Valeursdefré quencesubjectiveetd'imageriepourunéchantillonde1, 916substantifsdelalanguefrançaise.RevueCanadiennedePsychologieExpé rimentale,54,274-325.(Pubitemid33220153)
24. Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L'effet de la fréquence d'usage des mots inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l'identification du genre grammatical. Revue canadienne de psychologie, 43, 62-73.
25. Engwall, G. (1984). Vocabulaire du roman français (1962-1968) : dictionnaire des fréquences. Stockholm, Suède: Almqvist & Wiksell.
26. Ferlazzo, F., Conte, S., & Gentilomo, A. (1993). Event-related potentials and recognition memory: The effects of word imagery value. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 115-122. (Pubitemid 23266016)
27. Flieller,A.,&Tournois,J.(1994).Imageryvalue, subjectiveandobjectivefrequency,dateofentryintothelanguage, anddegreeofpolysemyinasampleof998Frenchwords.InternationalJournalofPsychology, 29,471-509.(Pubitemid24837172)
28. Forget,H.(2005).Valeursd'imagerieetdefré quencesubjectivede354motsduvocabulairesexueldelalanguefrançaise. RevueCanadiennedesSciencesduComportement,37,49-69.(Pubitemid40317051)
29. Fraisse, P. (1963). La perception des mots : étude sur les relations entre le seuil de reconnaissance et le temps de dénomination. In J. de Ajuriaguerra et al. (Eds.), Problèmes de psycho-linguistique (pp. 169-178). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
30. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concretness and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
31. Glass, A., & Meany, P. (1978). Evidence for two kinds of low-typical instances in a categorization task. Memory & Cognition, 6, 622-628.
32. Hammoud, R. (1984). Utilisation de l'image mentale et du champ d'associations dans l'enseignement du vocabulaire arabe à des débutants adultes francophones. Québec, Québec, Canada: Centre international de recherches sur le bilinguisme de l'Université Laval.
33. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. 2004Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720. (Pubitemid 38883577)
34. Hogenraad, R., & Orianne, E. (1981). Valences d'imagerie de 1 130 noms de la langue française parlée. Psychologica Belgica, 21, 21-30.
35. Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Vidual duration threshold as a function of a word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.
36. Imbs, P. (Ed.). (1971). Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences. I. Tables alphabétiques. Paris: Didier.
37. James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 130-136.
38. Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication. Brain and Language, 24, 1-19. (Pubitemid 15140323)
39. Juilland, A., Brodin, B., & Davidovitch, C. (1970). Frequency dictionary of French words. The Hague: Mouton.
40. Kroll, J. F., & Merves, J. S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Paychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 12, 92-107.
41. Lété,B.,Sprenger-Charolles,L.,Colé,P.(2004).MANULEX : Agrade-levellexicaldatabasefromFrenchelementaryschoolreaders. BehaviorResearchMethods,Instruments,&Computers,36,156-166. (Pubitemid38783105)
42. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task : Changing route or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 570-590. (Pubitemid 127064595)
43. Lyne, A. A. (1985). The vocabulary of French business correspondence: Word frequencies, collocations and problems of lexicometric method. Paris: Slatkine-Champion.
44. Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
46. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 167-180.
47. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
48. Murray, W. S., & Forster, K. I. (2004). Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review, 111, 721-756. (Pubitemid 38883578)
49. New, B., & Pallier, C. (2005). Manuel de Lexique 3. Document non publié, Laboratoire de psychologie expérimentale, Université René-Descartes, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
50. New,B.,Pallier,C.,Brysbaert,M.,&Ferrand,L.(2004).Lexique2: AnewFrenchlexicaldatabase.BehaviorResearchMethods,Instruments,&Computers,36, 516-524.(Pubitemid40140313)
51. Norris, D. (2006). The bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327-357. (Pubitemid 43815200)
52. Oléron, P. (1966). Estimation de mots français sur des échelles de fréquence et d'abstraction. Bulletin de Psychologie, 19, 603-610.
53. Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1129-1157.
54. Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263.
55. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
56. Paivio, A., Khan, M., & Begg, I. (2000). Concreteness of relational effects on recall of adjective-noun pairs. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 149-160.
57. Paivio, A., Philipchalk, R., & Rowe, E. J. (1975). Free and serial recall of pictures, sounds, and words. Memory & Cognition, 3, 586-590.
58. Paivio, A., Walsh, M., & Bons, T. (1994). Concreteness effects on memory: When and why? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1196-1204. (Pubitemid 24815974)
59. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1-25.
60. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavioural Research Method, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 376-379.
61. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modelling in the development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
62. Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 767-779.
63. Plaut,D.C.,McClelland,J.L.,Seidenberg,M.S.,&Patterson,K.(1996). Understandingnormalandimpairedwordreading:Computationalprinciplesinquasi- regulardomains.PsychologicalReview,103,56-115.(Pubitemid126421422)
64. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377500.
65. Raman,I.,Baluch,B.(2001). Semanticeffectsasafuctionofreadingskillsinwordnamingofatransparentorthography. ReadingandWriting:AnInterdisciplinaryJournal,14,599-614.(Pubitemid33810104)
66. Richardson, J. T. (1980). Concreteness, imagery, and semantic categorization. Journal of Mental Imagery, 4, 51-58.
67. Robin, F. (2006). Normes françaises pour des dessins, des noms concrets et des noms abstraits. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 60, 221-236.
68. Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neurolmage, 27, 188-200. (Pubitemid 40966894)
69. Strain, E., & Herdman, C. M. (1999). Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 347-359.
70. Strain, E., Patterson, K. E., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
71. Strain, E., Patterson, K. E., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 207-214.
72. Thompson, G. L., & Desrochers, A. (in press). Corroborating biased indicators: Global and local agreement between objective and subjective estimates of printed word frequency. Behavior Research methods.
73. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. vanHell,J.G.,&deGroot,A.M.D. 1998Disentanglingcontextavailabilityandconcretenessinlexicaldecisionandwordtr anslation.QuartelyJournalofExperimentalPsychology,51,41-63.(Pubitemid128459296)
75. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
76. Verlinde, S., & Selva, T. (2001). Nomenclature de dictionnaire et analyse de corpus. Cahiers de lexicologie, 79, 113-139.
77. Vikis-Freibergs, V. (1974). Fréquence d'usage des mots au Québec: Étude psycholinguistique d'un échantillon de la région montréalaise. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
78. Wagenmakers, E. J., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. (2000). Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 662-667.
79. Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1256-1271.
80. Wise, R. J. S., Howard, D., Mummery, C. J., Fletcher, P., Leff, A., Büchel, P., & Scott, S. K. (2000). Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 38, 985-994. (Pubitemid 30204433)
81. Zevin, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 121135.