Goal expectations meet regulatory focus: How appetitive and aversive competition influence negotiation

Social Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 437-454

  Velden, Femke S Ten ^a   Beersma, Bianca ^a   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749120861     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.437     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2005). Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 358-374.
3. Coombs, C. H. (1973). A reparameterization of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424-428.
4. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
5. De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305-328.
6. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Carnevale, P.J.D. (2003). Motivational basis for information processing and strategic choice in conflict and negotiation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 35, pp. 235-291). New York: Academic.
7. De Dreu, C.K.W., Koole, S., & Oldersma, F.L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
8. De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A., & Van Knip-penberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on in-tegrative negotiation: A meta-analytical review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
10. De Dreu, C. K. W., Yzerbyt, V Y., & Ley ens, J.-Ph. (1995). Dilution of stereotype-based cooperation in mixed-motive interdependence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 575-593.
11. Diekmann, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Galin-sky, A. D. (2003). From self-prediction to self-defeat: Behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 672-683.
12. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
13. Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
14. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
15. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
16. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being "right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395-409.
17. Kruglanski, A. W., Atash, M. N., DeGrada, E., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1005-1016.
18. Kruglanski, A.W., & Webster, D.M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
19. Liebrand, W B. G., Jansen, R. W T. L., Rijken, V M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
20. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V Y (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
21. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic.
22. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
23. Smith, D. L., Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1982). Matching and mismatching: The effect of own limit, other's toughness, and time pressure on concession rate in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 876-883.
24. Steinel, W., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419-434.
25. rh General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.
26. Tripp, T. M., & Sondak, H. (1992). An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation studies: Impasse rates and Pareto efficiency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 273-295.
27. Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Social value orientation and impression formation: A test of two competing hypotheses about information search in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 59-77.
28. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Man-stead, A. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 510-528
29. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1992). Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis. European Journal of Psychology, 6, 371-379.
30. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B., & Kuhl-man, D. (1990). Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-Person Prisoner's Dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 34-48.
31. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
32. Webster, D., & Kruglanski, A.W (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.