The influence of peripheral precues on the tendency to react towards a lateral relevant stimulus with multiple-item arrays

Biological Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-21

  Van Der Lubbe, Rob H J ^a   Woestenburg, Jaap C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Peripheral precues; Response tendencies; The LRP; The Simon effect; Visual spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032739209     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00019-8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allport D.A. Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. Heuer H., Sanders A.F. Perspectives on Perception and Action. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Campbell, K., Bell, I., 1992. InstEP systems. InstEP corp. Ottawa, Canada.
3. De Jong R., Wierda M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J.M. Use of partial information in responding. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 14:1988;682-692.
4. De Jong R., Liang C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 20:1994;731-750.
5. Donk M. Some evidence for unequal loss of location and feature information as a function of retinal eccentricity in visual search. Vis. Cog. 2:1995;201-220.
6. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 14:1988;331344.
7. Hedge A., Marsh N.W.A. The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychol. 39:1975;427-439.
8. Hommel B. The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychol. Res. 55:1993;208-222.
9. Hommel B. The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for temporal overlap. Psychol. Res. 55:1993;280-290.
10. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychol. Res. 56:1994;261-268.
11. Jasper H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:1958;371-375.
12. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 97:1990;253-270.
13. Leuthold H., Sommer W., Ulrich R. Partial Advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125:1996;307-323.
14. Neumann O. Beyond capacity: a functional view of attention. Heuer H., Sanders A.F. Perspectives on Perception and Action. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
15. Nicoletti R., Umiltà C. Splitting visual space with attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 15:1989;164-169.
16. Nicoletti R., Umiltà C. Attention shift produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol. Res. 56:1994;144-150.
17. Osman A., Moore C.M. The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 19:1993;1292-1312.
18. Posner M.I. Chronometric explorations of mind. 1978;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Bouma H., Bouwhuis D.G. Attention and Performance X. 1984;531-556 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Rubichi S., Nicoletti R., Iani C., Umiltà C. The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 23:1997;1353-1364.
21. Simon J.R., Acosta E. Jr., Mewaldt S.P., Speidel C.R. The effect of an irrelevant directional precue on choice reaction time: duration of the phenomena and its relation to stages of processing. Percept. Psychophys. 19:1976;16-22.
22. Stoffer T.H. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychol. Res. 53:1991;127-135.
23. Umiltà C., Liotti M. Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychol. Res. 49:1987;81-90.
24. Valle-Inclán F. The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study. Biol. Psychol. 43:1996;147-162.
25. Van der Heijden A.H.C. Selective Attention in Vision. 1992;Routledge, London, New York.
26. Van der Lubbe R.H.J., Keuss P.J.G., Stoffels E. Threefold effect of peripheral precues: Alertness, orienting, and response tendencies. Acta Psychol. 94:1996;19-337.
27. Van der Lubbe R.H.J., Woestenburg J.C. Modulation of early ERP components with peripheral precues: a trend analysis. Biol. Psychol. 45:1997;143-158.
28. Van der Lubbe, R.H.J., Woestenburg, J.C., accepted. Location selection in the visual domain. Psychophysiology.
29. Wascher E., Wauschkuhn B. The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralisations of the EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 99:1996;149-162.
30. Wauschkuhn B., Wascher E., Verleger R. Lateralised cortical activity due to preparation of saccades and finger movements: a comparative study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102:1997;114-124.
31. Woestenburg, J.C., 1983. Habituation of the event related potential, a new technology. Unpublished thesis Rijks Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands.
32. Woestenburg J.C., Verbaten M.N., vanHees H.H., Slangen J.L. Single trial ERP estimation in the frequency domain using Orthogonal Polynomial Trend Analysis (OPTA): estimation of individual habituation. Biol. Psychol. 17:1983;173-191.
33. Woestenburg J.C., Das-Smaal E.A., Brand E., Kramer S. Learning during visual search in children with attentional and learning problems: a trial-to-trial evaluation of RT and ERP measures. J. Psychophysiol. 6:1992;204-224.
34. Woestenburg, J.C., 1995. Statistical time series package for biological signals (STPBS)*Talo b.v., Bussum, The Netherlands.