Audience involvement and its antecedents: An analysis of the electronic bulletin board messages about an entertainment-education drama on divorce in Korea

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 6-21

  Bae, Hyuhn Suhck ^a   Lee, Byoungkwan ^b  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651206921     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0129298042000195125     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Action+reflection=learning (2000) TAP in Learning 3 (2) http://www.sedl.org/pubs/tapinto/v3n2.pdf(accessed 8 December 2002)
2. Bandura A, (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control New York Freeman
3. Baran, SJ, Chase, LJ, and Courtright, JA. (1979). Television drama as a facilitator of prosocial behavior: ‘The Waltons’. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(3): 277-284.
4. Bechtel RB, Achelpohl C, Akers R, (1972) Correlates between observed behavior and questionnaire responses on television viewing In E. A. Rubinstein, G. A. Comstock, & J. P. Murray (Eds.) Television and social behavior, vol. 4: Television in day-to-day life, patterns of us (DHEW Pub. HSM 72-9059, pp. 274-344) Washington DC Government Printing Office
5. Brunner CC, Cegala DJ, Conrad AB, (1981) Sex differences in movement during spontaneous conversation Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Communication, Language, and Gender Conference Morgantown WV
6. Burke K, (1945) A grammar of motives Berkeley CA University of California Press
7. Caughey JL, (1984) Imaginary social worlds: A cultural approach Lincoln NE University of Nebraska Press
8. Cegala, DJ. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30: 109-121.
9. Cho C, (2001, 24 May) Korea's divorce rate ranked first in Asia Hankookilbo http://www.hankooki.com/woman/200105/wo20010524162831H0000.htm1971, (accessed 6 July 2002)
10. Combining action and reflection in the classroom (2000) TAP in Learning 3 (2) http://www.sedl.org/pubs/tapinto/v3n2.pdf(accessed 8 December 2002)
11. Gans, HJ. (1977). Audience mail: Letters to an anchorman. Journal of Communication, 27(3): 86-91.
12. Greenberg BS, Salmon CT, Patel D, Beck V, Cole G, (2004) Evolution of an E-E research agenda In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E.M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Eds.) Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice pp. 191-206 Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum
13. Horton, D, and Wohl, RR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3): 188-211.
14. In Time (2002) Reflection http://www.intime.uni.edu/model/refl.html, (accessed 20 January 2003)
15. James, ML, Wotring, CE, and Forrest, EJ. (1995). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1): 30-50.
16. Katz, E, Liebes, T, and Berko, L. (1992). On commuting between television faction and real life. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 14: 157-178.
17. Kim J, (2001, 5 October) A serious approach to real cases of marital confliction http://www.tvcritique.co.kr/newsletters/what/what.htm?mode=View_Follow&id=597 (accessed 24 February 2003)
18. Kincaid, DL. (2002). Drama, emotion, and cultural convergence. Communication Theory, 12(2): 136-152.
19. Krugman, HE. (1966). The measurement of advertising involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30: 583-596.
20. Lemish, D. (1985). Soap opera viewing in college: A naturalistic inquiry. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29(3): 275-293.
21. Levy, MR. (1979). Watching TV news as para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(1): 69-80.
22. Levy, MR, and Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1): 51-78.
23. Liebes, T, and Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication, 1: 151-171.
24. McGuire, B, and LeRoy, DJ. (1977). Audience mail: Letters to the broadcaster. Journal of Communication, 27(3): 79-85.
25. Meyer, TP. (1973). Research reviews: Television and social behavior, reports and papers, vol II. Educational Broadcasting Review, 7(3): 191-201.
26. Meyrowitz J, (1982) Television and interpersonal behavior: Codes of perception and response In R. Cathcart, & G. Gumpert (Eds.) Inter-media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (3rd ed.) pp. 253-272 New York Oxford Press
27. Nordlund, JE. (1978). Media interaction. Communication Research, 5(2): 150-175.
28. Papa, MJ, Singhal, A, Law, S, Pant, S, Sood, S, Rogers, EM, and Shefner-Rogers, CL. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4): 31-55.
29. Park J, (2002, 23 September) TV provides reconciliation Newsmaker 492 http://www.khan.co.kr/nm/20020923/enter/contents.php3?id=2864(accessed 8 December 2002)
30. Perse, EM. (1998). Implications of cognitive and affective involvement for channel changing. Journal of Communication, 48(3): 49-68.
31. Rogers, EM, Vaughan, PW, Swalehe, RMA, Rao, N, Svenkerud, P, and Sood, S. (1999). Effects of an entertainment-education radio soap opera on family planning behavior in Tanzania. Studies in Family Planning, 30(3): 193-211.
32. Rubin, AM. (1985). Uses of daytime television soap operas by college students. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29(3): 241-258.
33. Rubin, AM, and Perse, EM. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(3): 246-268.
34. Rubin, AM, and Step, MM. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4): 635-654.
35. Rubin, AM, Perse, EM, and Powell, RA. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2): 155-180.
36. Rubin, RB, and McHugh, MP. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3): 279-292.
37. Salmon CT, (2001) Setting a research agenda for entertainment-education Proceedings from the conference meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA
38. Singhal A, Rogers EW, (1999) Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change Mahwah NJ Erlbaum
39. Singhal, A, and Rogers, EW. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2): 117-135.
40. Slater, MD, and Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2): 173-191.
41. Sood, S. (2002). Audience involvement and entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2): 153-172.
42. Sood, S, and Rogers, EM. (2000). Dimensions of parasocial interaction by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera in India. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(3): 386-414.
43. Stanford, SW. (1984). Predicting favorite TV program gratifications from general orientations. Communication Research, 11: 519-536.