Evolution of an E-E research agenda

Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 191-206

  Greenberg, Bradley S ^a   Salmon, Charles T ^a   Patel, Dhaval S ^d   Beck, Vicki ^b   Cole, Galen ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^d UNICEF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917262986     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609595     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Beck, V. (2000, November). Tune in for Health: Entertainment-education for reaching audiences at risk. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, Boston.
3. Bouman (1999). The turtle and the peacock: Collaboration for prosocial change. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University.
4. Brodie, M., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., Baer, N., Miller, C., Flournoy, R., & Altman, D. (2001). Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Affairs, 20(1), 192-199.
5. Brown, W. J. (1991). Prosocial effects of entertainment television in India. Asian Journal of Communication, 1(1), 113-135.
6. Brown, W. J., & Singhal, A. (1999). Entertainment-education media strategies for social change: Promises and problems (pp. 263-280). In D. Demers & K. Vishwanath (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
7. Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2001). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 223-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Chapel, T., & Cotton, D. (1996). Introduction to programevaluation: A guide for planning and policy practitioners. Prepared for the Office of ProgramPlanning and Evaluation. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
9. Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Chen, H. T., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7(3), 283-302.
11. Cole, G. (1999). Advancing the development and application of theory-based evaluation in the practice of public health. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(3), 453-470.
12. Cook, T. D., Appleton, H., Conner, R. F., Shaffer, A., Tamkin, G., & Weber, S. J. (1975). Sesame Street revisited. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14. Festinger, L., & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
15. Fokkens, P., & Jacoby, R. (2001). The entertainment-education 2000 event magazine (On-line). The International Entertainment-Education 2000 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Available: www.entertainment-education.nl.
16. Freudenberg, N., Eng, E., Flay, B., Parcel, G., Rogers, T., & Wallerstein, N. (1995). Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: In search of relevant theories and principles. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 290-306.
17. Greenberg, B. S., & Busselle, R. (1996). Soap operas and sexual activity: A decade later. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 153-160.
18. Lesser, G. S. (1974). Children and television: A lesson from Sesame Street. New York: Random House.
19. Montgomery, K. C. (1989). Target prime time. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Murdoch, G. (1980). Radical drama, radical theater. Media, Culture, & Society, 2, 151-168.
21. Nariman, H. N. (1993). Soap operas for social change. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
22. Papa, M., Singhal, A., Law, W., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. M., & Shefner-Rogers, C. L. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31-55.
23. Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Pechmann, C., & Stewart, D. W. (1988). A critical review of wearin and wearout. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 11, 285-330.
25. Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 874-884.
26. Piotrow, P. T. (1990). Principles of good health communication. In P. L. Coleman & R. C. Meyer (Eds.), Proceedings from the Enter-Educate Conference: Entertainment for Social Change (pp. 13-14). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Population Communication Services.
27. Piotrow, P. T., Meyer, R. C., & Zulu, B. A. (1992). AIDS and mass persuasion. In J. Mann, D. J. M. Tarantola, & T. W. Netter (Eds.), AIDS in the world (pp. 733-759). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Provus, M. M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation: For educational programimprovement. Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
29. Rogers, E. M., Vaughan, P.W., Swalehe, R. M. A., Rao, N., Svenkerud, P., & Sood, S. (1999). Effects of an entertainment-education radio soap opera on family planning behavior in Tanzania. Studies in Family Planning, 30(3), 193-211.
30. Salmon, C. T. (1994, February). Using entertainment-education to research a generation at risk. Summary report froma conference meeting sponsored by the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: CDC.
31. Salmon, C. T. (2001). Setting a research agenda for entertainment-education. Proceedings from the conference meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
32. Schlosser, J. (1998). Drug czar praises TV. Broadcasting & Cable, 128(46), 89.
33. Sharf, B. F., & Freimuth, V. S. (1993). The construction of illness on entertainment television: Coping with cancer on thirtysomething. Health Communication, 5(3), 141-160.
34. Sharf, B. F., Freimuth, V. S., Greenspon, P, & Plotnick, C. (1996). Confronting cancer on thirtysomething: Audience response to health content on entertainment television. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 157-172.
35. Singhal, A. (1990). Entertainment-education communication strategies for development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
36. Singhal, A., & Brown, W. J. (1997, May). Entertainment-education and social change: Past, present and future. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Entertainment-Education and Social Change, Athens, OH.
37. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2) 117-135.
39. Torvatn, H. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 73-82.
40. Valente, T. W., Kim, Y. M., Lettenmaier, C., Glass, W., & Dibba, Y. (1994). Radio promotion of family planning in The Gambia. International Family Planning Perspective, 20, 96-100.
41. Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). Queenstown, MD: Aspen Institute.
42. Weiss, C. H. (1996). Excerpts from evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 173-175.
43. Winsten J. A. (1994). Promoting designated drivers: The Harvard Alcohol Project. American Journal of Preventive Health, 10(3), 11-14.
44. Worthen, B. R. (1996). Editors note: The origins of theory-based evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 169-171.