Temporal constraints in renal perfusion imaging with a 2-compartment model

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 120-128

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a,c   Sourbron, Steven P ^a,c   Buettner, Claudia ^a   Lodemann, Klaus Peter ^b   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Bracco Altana Pharma   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acquisition time; Kidney; Magnetic resonance imaging; Renal perfusion; Renal plasma flow; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTRATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PLASMA FLOW; KIDNEY TUBULE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PLASMA VOLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUBE FLOW; URINARY EXCRETION;

EID: 38149124209     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181583b0c     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Nael K, et al. Functional renal imaging: nonvascular renal disease. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:1-16.
2. Grenier N, Hauger O, Cimpean A, et al. Update of renal imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:3-15.
3. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Oesingmann N, et al. Renal artery stenosis: functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements - feasibility study. Radiology. 2006;238:586-596.
4. Schoenberg SO, Aumann S, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:288-298.
5. Dujardin M, Sourbron S, Luypaert R, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion and function on a voxel-by-voxel basis: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:841-849.
6. Montet X, Ivancevic MK, Belenger J, et al. Noninvasive measurement of absolute renal perfusion by contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:584-592.
7. Michoux N, Vallee JP, Pechere-Bertschi A, et al. Analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images to assess renal function. Magma. 2006;19:167-179.
8. Michoux N, Montet X, Pechere A, et al. Parametric and quantitative analysis of MR renographic curves for assessing the functional behaviour of the kidney. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54:124-135.
9. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, et al. MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. Radiology. 2001;221:371-379.
10. Teh HS, Ang ES, Wong WC, et al. MR renography using a dynamic gradient-echo sequence and low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine as an alternative to radionuclide renography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:441-450.
11. Rohrschneider WK, Haufe S, Clorius JH, et al. MR to assess renal function in children. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1033-1045.
12. Sourbron S, Luypaert R, Van Schuerbeek P, et al. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:209-213.
13. Aumann S, Schoenberg SO, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): results in a canine model. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:276-287.
14. Annet L, Hermoye L, Peeters F, et al. Glomerular filtration rate: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a cortical-compartment model in the rabbit kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:843-849.
15. Hackstein N, Heckrodt J, Rau WS. Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate using a contrast-enhanced dynamic gradient-echo sequence and the Rutland-Patlak plot technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:714-725.
16. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology. 2003;227:289-294.
17. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al. Renal perfusion: comparison of saturation-recovery TurboFLASH measurements at 1. 5T with saturation-recovery TurboFLASH and time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique (TREAT) at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006:17051532.
18. Boss A, Martirosian P, Schaefer JF, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography: is saturation recovery TrueFISP advantageous over saturation recovery TurboFLASH? Invest Radiol. 2007;42:256-262.
19. Michaely HJ, Kramer H, Oesingmann N, et al. Intraindividual comparison of MR-renal perfusion imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Invest Radiol 2007;42:406-411.
20. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:715-724.
21. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, et al. Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:213-221.
22. Sourbron S, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, et al. MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:40-48.
23. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223-232.
24. Buckley DL, Shurrab AE, Cheung CM, et al. Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:1117-1123.