Renal artery stenosis: Functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements-feasibility study

Radiology

Volumn 238, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 586-596

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Oesingmann, Niels ^c   Ittrich, Carina ^d   Buhlig, Christopher ^a   Friedrich, Denise ^a   Struwe, Anja ^a   Rieger, Johannes ^a   Reininger, Cornelia ^e   Samtleben, Walter ^a   Weiss, Max ^b   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^d GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^e GE Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; BOLUS INJECTION; CALCULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXIMUM SIGNAL INTENSITY; MAXIMUM UPSLOPE; MEAN TRANSIT TIME; MEASUREMENT; PEARSON PRODUCT MOMENT CORRELATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL INTENSITY TIME CURVE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; TECHNIQUE; TIME; TIME TO SIGNAL INTENSITY PEAK; TURBO FAST LOW ANGLE SHOT SEQUENCE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; RENAL CIRCULATION;

EID: 31144435889     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041553     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Nittka M, Dietrich O, Johannson LO, Reiser MF. Renal MR angiography: current debates and developments in imaging of renal artery stenosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003;24:255-267.
2. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Kirsch M, Weintraub J, Laub G. Contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of renal arteries: optimization of technique and pitfalls. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:912-923.
3. Tan KT, van Beek EJ, Brown PW, van Delden OM, Tijssen J, Ramsay LE. Magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2002;57:617-624.
4. Prince MR. Renal MR angiography: a comprehensive approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:511-516.
5. de Haan MW, Kouwenhoven M, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM. Renal artery blood flow: quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1133-1137.
6. de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM, Houben AJ, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow quantification in renal arteries: comparison with 133Xenon washout measurements. Hypertension 2003;41:114-118.
7. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A. Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:2190-2198.
8. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Johnson G, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility. Radiology 2001;221:371-379.
9. Gandy SJ, Sudarshan TA, Sheppard DG, Allan LC, McLeay TB, Houston JG. Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: a functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:461-466.
10. Montet X, Ivancevic MK, Belenger J, et al. Noninvasive measurement of absolute renal perfusion by contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:584-592.
11. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, Lee P, Raghavan M, Kramer EL. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:289-294.
12. Karger N, Biederer J, Lusse S, et al. Quantitation of renal perfusion using arterial spin labeling with FATR-UFLARE. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:641-647.
13. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MHA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:685-696.
14. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Stuber M, Gunther RVV, Buecker A. Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography. Radiology 2003;227:897-902.
15. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:171-180.
16. Fann JI, Sarris GE, Mitchell RS, et al. Treatment of patients with aortic dissection presenting with peripheral vascular complications. Ann Surg 1990;212:705-713.
17. Hillege HL, Girbes AR, de Kam PJ, et al. Renal function, neurohormonal activation, and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2000;102:203-210.
18. Laissy JP, Faraggi M, Lebtahi R, et al. Functional evaluation of normal and ischemic kidney by means of gadolinium-DOTA enhanced TurboFLASH MR imaging: a preliminary comparison with 99Tc-MAGS dynamic scintigraphy. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:413-419.
19. Rundback JH, Sacks D, Kent KC, et al. Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;106:1572-1585.
20. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:506-514.
21. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, et al. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:531-539.
22. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
23. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Prince MR, Londy F, Knopp MA. Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: strategies for timing and contrast media injection-original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998;33:506-514.
24. Thompson HK, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964;14:502-515.
25. Romero JC, Lerman LO. Novel noninvasive techniques for studying renal function in man. Semin Nephrol 2000;20:456-462.
26. Krier JD, Ritman EL, Bajzer Z, Romero JC, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular nitration, and tubular function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2001;281: F630-F638.
27. Tofts PS, Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91-101.
28. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Modeling of data. In: Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992;521-529.
29. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:158-169.
30. Kirchheim HR, Ehmke H, Hackenthal E, Lowe W, Persson P. Autoregulation of renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and renin release in conscious dogs. Pflugers Arch 1987;410:441-449.
31. Schoenberg SO, Just A, Bock M, Knopp MV, Persson PB, Kirchheim HR. Noninvasive analysis of renal artery blood flow dynamics with MR cine phase-contrast flow measurements. Am J Physiol 1997;272(5 pt 2): H2477-H2484.
32. Penzkofer H, Wintersperger BJ, Knez A, Weber J, Reiser M. Assessment of myocardial perfusion using multisection first-pass MRI and color-coded parameter maps: a comparison to 99mTc Sesta MIBI SPECT and systolic myocardial wall thickening analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:161-170.
33. Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K, Bongartz GM, Steinbrich W. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels: different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies-a review. Invest Radiol 1998;33:538-546.
34. Aumann S, Schoenberg SO, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): results in a canine model. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:276-287.
35. Schoenberg SO, Aumann S, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:288-298.
36. Prasad PV, Cannillo J, Chavez DR, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and first-pass renal perfusion imaging using MS-325, an intravascular contrast agent. Acad Radiol 1998;5(suppl 1):S219-S222.
37. Debatin JF, Ting RH, Wegmuller H, et al. Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. Radiology 1994;190:371-378.
38. Paul JF, Ugolini P, Sapoval M, Mousseaux E, Gaux JC. Unilateral renal artery stenosis: perfusion patterns with electron-beam dynamic CT-preliminary experience. Radiology 2001;221:261-265.