Seismic performance of RC frames designed to eurocode 8 or to the Greek codes 2000

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 221-259

  Panagiotakos, Telemachos B ^a   Fardis, Michael N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Collapse prevention; Damage limitation; Drift control; Ductility; Earthquakeresistant design; Eurocode 8; Life safety; RC buildings; RC frames; Seismic design

Indexed keywords

COLLAPSE PREVENTION; DAMAGE LIMITATION; EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN; EUROCODE 8; LIFE SAFETY; RC BUILDINGS; RC FRAMES;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DESIGN; DUCTILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; TEXTILES;

EARTHQUAKES;

EID: 33748642353     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-004-2288-2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. CEN (2003). prEN1998-1:2003 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Formal Vote Version (Stage 49), November 2003.
2. Fédération internationale du béton (fib) (2003) Seismic assessment and retrofit of RC buildings. Chapter 4: fib Bulletin No. 24, Lausanne.
3. Litton, R.W. (1975). A Contribution to the Analysis of Concrete Structures under Cyclic Loading. Ph.D. Thesis. Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of California, Berkeley, California.
4. Otani, S. (1974) Inelastic Analysis of R/C Frame Structures. ASCE, Journal of Structural Division 100 (ST7), 1433-1449.
5. Panagiotakos T. and Fardis M.N. (2001). Deformations of R.C. members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Structural Journal 98(2) 135-148.
6. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1994) Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 23 502-521.