Negotiating curricular transitions: foreign language teachers' learning experience with Content-based instruction

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 559-585

  Cammarata, Laurent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Content based instruction (CBI); Foreign language (FL) programs; Professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650925222     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: 17101131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.65.4.559     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ayers, W. (1992). Work that is real: Why teachers should be empowered. In G. Hess, Jr. (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eye of anthropologists (pp. 13-28). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
2. Bollnow, O. (1989). The pedagogical atmosphere: The perspective of the educator Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 7, 64-78.
3. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Byrnes, H. (2000). Languages across the curriculum: Interdepartmental curriculum construction. In M.-R. Kecht & K. von Hammerstein (Eds.), Languages across the curriculum: Interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education. Columbus: National East Asian Languages Resource Center, The Ohio State University.
5. Carless, D. R. (1998). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System, 26, 353-368.
6. Carlsson, G., Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (2000). Encountering violence and aggression in mental health nursing: A phenomenological study of tacit caring knowledge. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 21, 533-545.
7. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
8. Cloud, N. (1998). Teacher competencies in content-based instruction. In M. Met (Ed.), Critical issues in early second language learning: Building for our children's future (pp. 113-124). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman/Addison-Wesley.
9. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Learning and existence. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Dahlberg, K., Drew, N., & Nyström, M. (2001). Reflective lifeworld research. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
11. Dahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H., & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective lifeworld research (2nd ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
12. Davison, C., & Williams, A. (2001). Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In C. Davison (Ed.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning, and identity. Singapore: Pearson Education.
13. De Lano, L., Riley, L., & Crookes, G. (1994). The meaning of innovation for ESL teachers. System, 22, 487-496.
14. Dupuy, B. C. (2000). Content-based instruction: Can it help ease the transition from beginning to advanced foreign language classes? Foreign Language Annals, 33, 205-223.
15. Early, M. (2001). Language and content in social practice: A case study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 156-179.
16. Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Belgium: Eurydice European Unit. Retrieved March 9, 2009, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0-integral/071EN.pdf.
17. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Gebhard, J. G., & Oprandy, R. (1999). Language teaching awareness: A guide to exploring beliefs and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
20. Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion (Educational Practice Reports No. 11, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
21. Genesee, F. (1998). Content-based language instruction. In M. Met (Ed.), Critical issues in early second language learning: Building for our children's future (pp. 103-105). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman/Addison- Wesley.
22. Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
23. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-260.
24. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 5-21). White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
25. Haataja, K. (2007). A definition of CLIL as an umbrella term: A historical perspective. In B. González (Ed.), Good practice in content and language integrated learning. Spain: BeCLIL Project. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.beclil.com/docus-publicos/ingles.zip.
26. Hall Haley, M., & Austin, T. Y. (2004). Content-based second language teaching and learning: An interactive approach. Boston: Pearson Education.
27. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
28. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116.
29. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
30. Johnson, K., & Swain, M. (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Johnson, M. E. (1998). Being mentally ill: A phenomenological inquiry. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 12 (4), 195-201.
32. Kennedy, C., & Kennedy, J. (1996). Teacher attitudes and change implementation. System, 24, 351-360.
33. Kennedy, T. J. (2006). Language learning and its impact on the brain: Connecting language learning with the mind through content-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 471-486.
34. Klee, C. A., & Tedick, D. J. (1997). The undergraduate foreign language immersion in Spanish at the University of Minnesota. In S. B. Stryker & B. L. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Kostoff, R. N. (2003). Stimulating innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The first review of special education (Vol. 2, pp. 388-400). Philadelphia: JSE Press.
36. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
37. Malian, I., & Nevin, A. I. (2005). A framework for understanding assessment of innovation in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32 (3), 7-17.
38. Markee, N. (1993). The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 229-243.
39. Marks, S. U., & Gersten, R. (1998). Engagement and disengagement between special and general educators: An application of Miles and Huberman's cross-case analysis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 21, 34-36.
40. Met, M. (1999). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. College Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center.
41. Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42. Olson, J. (1989). Room for learning. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 7, 173-186.
43. O'Malley, J. M. (1990). The cognitive basis for second language acquisition. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics, language teaching, and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice, and research (pp. 478-496). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44. Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 48-72.
45. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 3-16). New York: Plenum Press.
46. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-950). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
48. Rudduck, J. (1988). The ownership of change as a basis for teachers' professional learning. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers' professional learning (pp. 205-222). London: Falmer Press.
49. Snow, M. A. (1991). Teaching language through content. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 315-328). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
50. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. (Eds.). (1997). The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
51. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and context in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 201-216.
52. Sternberg, R., Pretz, J., & Kaufman, J. (2003). Types of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The first review of special education (Vol. 2, pp. 158-169). Philadelphia: JSE Press.
53. Stoller, F. L., & Grabe, W. (1997). A six-T's approach to content-based instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
54. Stryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: From theory to practice. In S. B. Stryker & B. L. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
55. Swain, M. (1996). Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 529-548.
56. Troncale, N. (2002). Content-based instruction, cooperative learning, and CALP instruction: Addressing the whole education of 7-12 ESL. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Teacher College, Columbia University, 8 (2). Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/ tesolalwebjournal/archives2002.htm
57. Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and how CLIL works: An outline for a CLIL theory. Vienna English Working Papers, 16 (3), 70-78. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.univie.ac. at/Anglistik/Views-0703.pdf
58. Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
59. van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
60. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press.
61. van Manen, M. (2002). The tone of teaching. (2nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press.