The development of an ICF-oriented, adaptive physician assessment instrument of mobility, self-care, and domestic life

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 98-107

  Farin, Erik ^a   Fleitz, Annette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

And health; Disability; Item response theory; Mobility; Outcome assessment (health care); Questionnaires; Self care; The international classification of functioning

Indexed keywords

AND HEALTH; DISABILITY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MOBILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-CARE; THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING;

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION; SURVEYS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ARTICLE; HEART DISEASE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RASCH ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION PATIENT; SELF CARE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION; SELF CARE;

EID: 67650870171     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283112979     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995). Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310:170.
2. Bond TG, Fox CM (2001). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, de Groot JM, van den Bos GAM, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA (1999). Handicap questionnaires: What do they assess? Disabil Rehabil 21:97-105.
4. Cella D, Chang CH (2000). A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care 38:II-66-II-72.
5. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün TB, Stucki G (2005). ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 37:212-218. (Pubitemid 41025328)
6. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
7. Dallmeijer A, Dekker J, Roorda L, Knol D, Van Baalen B, de Groot V, Schepers V, Lankhorst G (2005). Differential item functioning of the functional independence measure in higher performing neurological patients. J Rehabi Med 37:346-352. (Pubitemid 41823729)
8. Farin E, Fleitz A, Follert P (2006). Development of an ICF-oriented patient questionnaire for the assessment of mobility and self-care [German]. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 16:197-211. (Pubitemid 44606092)
9. Farin E, Fleitz A, Frey C (2007). Psychometric properties of an ICF-oriented, adaptive questionnaire for the assessment of mobility, self care and domestic life. J Rehab Med 39:537-546.
10. Hageman WJ, Arrindell WA (1999). Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precison and distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behav Res Ther 37:1169-1193.
11. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres PL, Ludlow LH, Pengsheng N, Bond TLY, et al. (2004a). Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care 42:I-49-I-61.
12. Haley SM, Andres PL, Coster WJ, Kosinski M, Pengsheng N, Jette AM (2004b). Short-form activity measure for post-acute care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:649-660. (Pubitemid 38881056)
13. Haley SM, Siebens H, Coster WJ, Tao W, Black-Schaffer RM, Gandek B, et al. (2006). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 1033-1042. (Pubitemid 44107845)
14. Hewlett SA (2003). Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol 30:877-879.
15. Hu LT, Bentler P (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6:1-55.
16. Janse AJ, Gemke RJBJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, van der Tweel I, Kimpen JLL, Sinnema G (2004). Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a metaanalysis. J Clin Epidemiol 57:653-661. (Pubitemid 39198951)
17. Jette AM (2006). Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86:726-734.
18. Jette AM, Haley SM (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 37:339-345. (Pubitemid 41823728)
19. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW,Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV (1994). The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:127-132. (Pubitemid 24061483)
20. Lundgren-Nilsson A, Grimby G, Ring H, Tesio L, Lawton G, Slade A, et al. (2004). Cross-cultural validity of functional independence measure items in stroke: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 37:23-31. (Pubitemid 40214505)
21. Mantel N (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Ass 58:700.
22. McHorney CA, Cohen AS (2000). Equating health status measures with item response theory. Illustrations with functional status items. Med Care 38:II-43-II-59.
23. Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes (Online-Ausgabe) 28:27. (Pubitemid 39111969)
24. Snow AL, Cook KF, Lin P, Morgan RO, Magaziner J (2005). Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations. Health Serv Res 40:1676-1693. (Pubitemid 41434354)
25. Stucki G (2005). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:733-740. (Pubitemid 41416269)
26. Swanson G, Carrothers L, Mulhorn KA (2003). Comparing disability survey questions in five countries: a study using ICF to guide comparisons. Disabil Rehabil 25:665-675. (Pubitemid 36806201)
27. Tucker L, Lewis C (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38:1-10.
28. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M (2003). The International classification of functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 25:565-571. (Pubitemid 36806189)
29. WINSTEPS Rasch Measurement (Version 3.60.1) [Computer Software]. (2006). Chicago.
30. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. ICF the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.