Psychometric properties of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-oriented, adaptive questionnaire for the assessment of mobility, self-care and domestic life

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 537-546

  Farin, Erik ^a   Fleitz, Annette ^a   Frey, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

ICF; Item response theory; Outcome assessment (healthcare); Questionnaires; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GERMANY; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LEARNING; LIFE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PSYCHOMETRY; RASCH ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; RELIABILITY; SELF CARE; SHORT FORM 36; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34648828649     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0083     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dahl TH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: an introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 201-204.
2. Okochi J, Utsonomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 46.
3. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün TB, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37; 212-218.
4. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres PL, Ludlow LH, Pengsheng N, Bond TLY, et al. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care 2004; 42: I49-61.
5. Long JS, Pavalko E. Comparing alternative measures of functional limitation. Med Care 2004; 42: 19-27.
6. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205-210.
7. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000; 38 (9 suppl II): II28-42.
8. Fischer GH, Molenaar IW, editors. Rasch models - foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer; 1995.
9. Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 339-345.
10. Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Med Care 2000; 38 (suppl II): II73-82.
11. Farin E, Follert P, Gerdes N, Jäckel WH, Thalau J. Quality assessment in rehabilitation centres: the indicator system "Quality Profile". Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1096-1104.
12. Haley SM, Siebens H, Coster WJ, Tao W, Black-Schaffer RM, Gandek B, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1033-1042.
13. Farin E, Fleitz A, Follert P. Entwicklung eines ICF-orientierten Patientenfragebogens zur Erfassung von Mobilität und Selbstversorgung. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2006; 16: 197-211.
14. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
15. Kirschner S, Walther M, Bohm D, Matzer M, Heesen T, Faller H, et al. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatol Int 2003; 23: 15-20.
16. Dixon T, Lim LLY, Oldridge N. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: reference data for users. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 173-183.
17. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127-132.
18. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
19. Coster WJ, Haley SM, Andres PL, Ludlow LH, Bond TLY, Pengsheng N. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement. Personal care and instrumental activities domain. Med Care 2004; 42: I62-72.
20. Conrad KJ, Smith EV. International conference on objective measurement. Applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care 2004; 41 (suppl 1): I1-6.
21. Masters GN. Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982; 47:149-174.
22. WINSTEPS Rasch Measurement (Version 3.60.1) (Software); 2006.
23. Bond TG, Fox CM, editors. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
24. Hu LT, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999; 6: 1-55.
25. Tucker L, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1973; 38: 1-10.
26. Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 28: 27.
27. Stratford P, Riddle D. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 23.
28. Algina J, Keselman HJ, Penfield RD. Effect sizes and their intervals: the two-level repeated measures case. Educ Psychol Meas 2005; 65: 241-258.
29. Hageman WJ, Arrindell WA. Establishing clinically significant change: increment of precison and distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behav Res Ther 1999; 37: 1169-1193.
30. Cohen J, editor. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). New York: Academic Press; 1988.
31. Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 145-149.
32. Kaiser HF, Rice J. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas 1974; 34: 111-117.
33. Dubuc N, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT, Jette AM. Assessing disability in older adults: the effects of asking questions with and without health attribution. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 226-231.
34. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 2005; 87: 1038-1046.
35. Farin E, Glattacker M, Follert P, Kuhl C, Jäckel WH. Effekte und Prädiktoren des Outcomes in der Rehabilitation muskuloskelettaler Erkrankungen. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2004; 14: 123-133.