Comparing disability survey questions in five countries: A study using ICF to guide comparisons

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 11-12, 2003, Pages 665-675

  Swanson, Gretchen ^a   Carrothers, Leeanne ^a   Mulhorn, Kristine A ^b  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FRANCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND FUNCTION; HAND GRIP; HEALTH SURVEY; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOBILIZATION; NETHERLANDS; PERSONAL HYGIENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SOUTH AFRICA; SPEECH; UNITED NATIONS; UNITED STATES; VISION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CANADA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FRANCE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOUTH AFRICA; UNITED STATES; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0037744678     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000137162     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Principles and recommendations for Population and Housing Census in the forthcoming, United Nations Publication.
2. Manual for the Development of Statistical Information for Disability Programmes and Policies. United Nations, 1996.
3. Haber LD. Identifying the disabled: concepts and methods in the measurement of disability. Social Security Bulletin December, 1967; 17-34.
4. Ustun TB, Rehm J, Chatterji S, Saxena S, Trotter R, Room R, Bickenbach J. Multiple-informant ranking of the disabling effects of different health conditions in 14 countries: WHO/NIH Joint Project CAR Study Group, Lancet 1999; 354(9173): 111-115.
5. Hermanova HM. Epidemiology of disability and implications for practice. Public Health Review 1993-94; 21(3-4): 197-206.
6. Hendershot GE. Integrating comparable measures of disability in federal surveys: the National Center for Health Statistics. In Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Seminar on Integrating Federal Statistical Information and Processes, Part 1 of 2. Statistical Policy Working Paper 32. Washington: Office of Management and Budget, 2001; 115-151.
7. Manual for the Development of Statistical Information for Disability Programmes and Policies, United Nations publication, Sales No. E.96, XVII.4 1996.
8. United Nations. Disability Statistics Compendium. Series Y, No. 4 (ST/ESA/STAT/SER.Y/4). New York, 1990.
9. Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17(3-4): 145-153.
10. Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: Developments for a new era of outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81(12 Supplement 2): S10-14.
11. Tepper S, Sutton J, Beatty P, DeJong G. Alternative definitions of disability: relationship to health-care expenditures. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19(12): 556-558.
12. Lerman Y, Ribak J. The need for consistent criteria for impairment and disability. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 1997; 3(4): 273-276.
13. Laman H, Lankhorst GJ. Subjective Weighting of Disability: An approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 1994; 16(4): 198-204.
14. National Center for Health Statistics. Training Manual for the ICIDH. 116-118, by Robert Ficke, An Analysis of Disability Among Children. NCHS, Hyattsville, MD, 1995.
15. UN International Seminar on the Measurement of Disability. New York, 4-6 June 2001. Presentations may be found at http://www.un.org/Depts/unsd/disability/methods/index.html.
16. Maier W, Gansicke M, Freyberger HJ, Linz M, Heun R, Lecrubier Y. Generalized anxiety disorder (ICD-10) in primary care from a cross-cultural perspective: A valid diagnostic entity? Acta Psychiatric Scandinavian 2000; 101(1): 29-36.