Control-theoretic results on dynamic decision making

WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 576-584

  Xu, Shi Yun ^a   Jiang, Z P ^b   Yang, Y ^a   Huang, L ^a   Repperger, Daniel W ^c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Control theory; Dynamic decision making; Reliance on automation; Sugar Factory task; Supervisory control

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVITY; AMOUNT OF INFORMATIONS; APPROACHES TO LEARNINGS; CASE STUDIES; CONTROL MODELS; DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL MODELS; FEEDBACK CONTROL THEORIES; ON DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE MODELS; RELIANCE ON AUTOMATION; SHORT-COMINGS; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; SUPERVISORY CONTROL SYSTEMS; SYSTEM EFFICIENCIES;

AUTOMATION; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FEEDBACK; FOOD PRODUCTS PLANTS; PROCESS CONTROL; REMOTE CONTROL; ROBUST CONTROL; SCADA SYSTEMS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGAR FACTORIES; SUGARS; SYSTEM THEORY;

CONTROL THEORY;

EID: 67650823579     PISSN: 19918763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. D. C. Berry and D. E. Broadbent, On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A, 1984, pp. 209-231.
2. D. C. Berry and D. E. Broadbent, The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control, Psychological Research 49, 1987, pp. 7-15.
3. B. Brehmer, Strategies in real-time, dynamic decision making. In R. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights from decision making, Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 262-279.
4. B. Brehmer, Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems, Acta Psychologica 81, 1992, pp. 211-241.
5. A. Buchner, J. Funke and D. C. Berry, Negative correlations between control performance and verbalizeable knowledge: Indicators for implicit learning in process control tasks, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A(1), 1995, pp. 166-187.
6. J. R. Busemeyer, Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models, Journal of Experimental Psychology 11, 1985, pp. 538-564.
7. J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend, Decision field theory: A dynamic cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment, Psychol. Rev. 100(3), 1993, pp. 432-459.
8. J. R. Busemeyer and A. Diederich, Survey of decision field theory, Math. Soc. Sci. 43(3), 2002, pp. 345-370.
9. D. Fum and A. Stocco, Instance vs. rule based learning in controlling a dynamic system, Proceedings of the international conference on cognitive modelling, Universitats-Verlag Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany, 2003, pp. 105-110.
10. Z. Dienes and R. Fahey, Role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 1995, pp. 848-862.
11. S. Farrell and S. Lewandowsky, A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(2), 2000, pp. 395-410.
12. G. F. Franklin and J. D. Powell and M. L. Workman, Digital Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 1992
13. G. F. Franklin and J. D. Powell, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall 2006
14. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1975
15. J. Gao and J. D. Lee, Extending the Decision Field Theory to Model Operators' Reliance on Automation in Supervisory Control Situations, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans 36(5), 2006, pp. 943-959.
16. F. P. Gibson and D. C. Plaut, A connectionist formulation of learning in dynamic decision-making tasks, Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1995, pp. 512-517.
17. F. P. Gibson, The Sugar Production Factory - A Dynamic Decision Task, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2:1, 1996, pp. 49-60.
18. F. P. Gibson, M. Fichman and P. Plaut, Learning in dynamic decision tasks: computational model and empirical evidence, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71(1), July, 1997, pp. 1-35.
19. R. M. Hogarth, Generalization in decision research: The role of formal models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 16, 1986, pp. 439-449.
20. M. I. Jordan, Constrained supervised learning, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 36, 1992, pp. 396-425.
21. M. I. Jordan, Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning, In H. Heuer, and S. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Motor skills, New York: Academic Press 1997
22. M. I. Jordan and D. E. Rumelhart, Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher, Cognitive Science 16(3), 1992, pp. 307-354.
23. J. D. Lee and N. Moray, Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems, Ergonomics 35(10), 1992, pp. 1243-1270.
24. J. D. Lee and N. Moray, Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation, Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 40(1), 1994, pp. 153-184.
25. J. D. Lee and K. A. See, Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance, Human Factors 46(1), Spring 2004, pp. 50-80.
26. B. M. Muir, Trust in automation 1: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems, Ergonomics 37(11), 1994, pp. 1905-1922.
27. B. M. Muir and N. Moray, Trust in automation 2: Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation, Ergonomics 39(3), 1996, pp. 429-460.
28. K. Ogata, Discrete-time Control Systems, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall 1987
29. R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse, Hum. Factors 39(2), 1997, pp. 230-253.
30. D. W. Repperger and C. A. Phillips, The Human Role in Automation, Handbook of Automation, Springer -Verlag, April 2008
31. R. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend, Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision-making, Psychol. Rev. 108(2), 2001, pp. 370-392.
32. W. B. Stanley, R. C. Mathews, R.R. Buss and S. Kotler-Cope, Insight without awareness: On the interaction of verbalization, instruction, and practice in a simulated process control task, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41A(3), 1989, pp. 553-577.
33. N. A. Taatgen and D. Wallach, Whether skill acquisition is rule or instance based is determined by the structure of the task, Cognitive Science Quarterly 2, 2002, pp. 163-204.
34. A. C. Wick, S. L. Berman and T. M. Jones, The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic, Academy of Management Review 24, 1999, pp. 99-116.
35. R. E. Wood and A. Bandura, Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 1989, pp. 407-415.