A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1181-1192

  van Gelder, Rogier E ^a   Florie, Jasper ^a   Nio, C Yung ^a   Jensch, Sebastiaan ^a,b   de Jager, Steven W ^a   Vos, Frans M ^a,c   Venema, Henk W ^a   Bartelsman, Joep F ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^a   Laméris, Johan S ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b 'Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis' ^*  (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Colon; Colon neoplasms; Computed tomography (CT); CT; Multi detector row

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34247887618     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0487-8     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA et al (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311-319
2. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713-1719
3. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: Prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305-311
4. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191-2200
5. Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr, Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 212:203-212
6. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Garry J (2001) Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: A new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:864-869
7. McFarland E, Brink J, Pilgram T et al (2001) Spiral ct colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques. Radiology 218:375-383
8. Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi CA, Napel S (2000) Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:179-188
9. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman RL, Ilstrup DM (1996) Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: Two- versus three- dimensional techniques. Work in progress [see comments]. Radiology 200:49-54
10. Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1543-1549
11. Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: Preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151-1158
12. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW et al (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: Conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228:878-885
13. Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, Schmidt SA, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2006) CT colonography: Comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68-72
14. van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127:41-48
15. Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231:761-766
16. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704-711
17. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: Initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393-403
18. Lui YW, Macari M, Israel G, Bini EJ, Wang H, Babb J (2003) CT colonography data interpretation: Effect of different section thicknesses-preliminary observations. Radiology 229:791-797
19. Luboldt W, Tryon C, Kroll M et al (2005) Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: An approach based on contrast and volume. Eur Radiol 15:247-253
20. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A et al (2006) Polyp detection with CT colonography: Primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 239:759-767
21. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE (2001) Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: Feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219:51-59
22. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A et al (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: A prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355:1211-1214
23. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:292-300
24. Jensch S, van Gelder RE, Venema HW et al (2006) Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: Results of an inventory among research institutions. Eur Radiol 16:981-987
25. Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M et al (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15:1192-1202
26. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765-771
27. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2004) CT colonography: Effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025-1033