Pinacidil induces vascular dilation and hyperemia in vivo and does not impact biophysical properties of neurons and astrocytes in vitro

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Volumn 76, Issue SUPPL.2, 2009, Pages

  Cao, Rosa ^a   Nelson, Mark T ^b   Ramos, Raddy ^c   Moore, Christopher I ^d   Brumberg, Joshua C ^e   Higashikubo, Bryan T ^a   Cardin, Jessica ^d   Knoblich, Ulf ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PINACIDIL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; C57BL MOUSE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DRUG EFFECT; HYPEREMIA; MOUSE; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CELL; PATHOLOGY; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VASCULARIZATION; VASODILATATION;

ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; HYPEREMIA; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NEOCORTEX; NEURONS; PINACIDIL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; VASODILATION;

EID: 67650766433     PISSN: 08911150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.16     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Roy CS, Sherrington CS. On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain. J Physiol 1890; 11:85-108, 158-7-158-17.
2. Raichle ME. Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: a historical and physiological perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:765-772.
3. Moore CI, Cao R. The hemo-neural hypothesis: on the role of blood flow in information processing. J Neurophysiol 2008; 99:2035-2047.
4. Garthwaite G, Bartus K, Malcolm D, et al. Signaling from blood vessels to CNS axons through nitric oxide. J Neurosci 2006; 26:7730-7740.
5. Kozlov AS, Angulo MC, Audinat E, Charpak S. Target cellspecific modulation of neuronal activity by astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:10058-10063.
6. Nedergaard M, Ransom B, Goldman SA. New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends Neurosci 2003; 26:523-530.
7. Haydon PG, Carmignoto G. Astrocyte control of synaptic transmission and neurovascular coupling. Physiol Rev 2006; 86:1009-1031.
8. Ashcroft FM, Gribble FM. New windows on the mechanism of action of K(ATP) channel openers. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2000; 21:439-445.
9. Levin BE, Dunn-Meynell AA, Routh VH. Brain glucosensing and the K(ATP) channel. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:459-460.
10. Zawar C, Plant TD, Schirra C, Konnerth A, Neumcke B. Celltype specific expression of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 1999; 514:327-341.
11. Li L, Wu J, Jiang C. Differential expression of Kir6.1 and SUR2B mRNAs in the vasculature of various tissues in rats. J Membr Biol 2003; 196:61-69.
12. Schwanstecher M, Sieverding C, Dorschner H, et al. Potassium channel openers require ATP to bind to and act through sulfonylurea receptors. EMBO J 1998; 17:5529-5535.
13. Shindo T, Yamada M, Isomoto S, Horio Y, Kurachi Y. SUR2 subtype (A and B)-dependent differential activation of the cloned ATP-sensitive K+ channels by pinacidil and nicorandil. Br J Pharmacol 1998; 124:985-991.
14. Russ U, Lange U, Loffler-Walz C, Hambrock A, Quast U. Binding and effect of KATP channel openers in the absence of Mg2+. Br J Pharmacol 2003; 139:368-380.
15. Higdon NR, Khan SA, Buchanan LV, Meisheri KD. Tissue and species variation in the vascular receptor binding of 3H-P1075, a potent KATP opener vasodilator. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 280:255-260.
16. Wahl M. The effects of pinacidil and tolbutamide in feline pial arteries in situ. Pflugers Arch 1989; 415:250-252.
17. Hempelmann RG, Barth HL, Mehdorn HM, Pradel RH, Ziegler A. Effects of potassium channel openers in isolated human cerebral arteries. Neurosurgery 1995; 37:1146-1153.
18. Quayle JM, Nelson MT, Standen NB. ATP-sensitive and inwardly rectifying potassium channels in smooth muscle. Physiol Rev 1997; 77:1165-1232.
19. Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Kerr JN, Helmchen F. Sulforhodamine 101 as a specific marker of astroglia in the neocortex in vivo. Nat Methods 2004;1:31-37.
20. Kong Y, Zheng Y, Johnston D, et al. A model of the dynamic relationship between blood flow and volume changes during brain activation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004; 24:1382-1392.
21. Martin C, Martindale J, Berwick J, Mayhew J. Investigating neural-hemodynamic coupling and the hemodynamic response function in the awake rat. Neuroimage 2006; 32:33-48.
22. Jones M, Devonshire IM, Berwick J, Martin C, Redgrave P, Mayhew J. Alterered neurovascular coupling during information-processing states. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27:2758-2772.
23. Woolsey TA, Rovainen CM, Cox SB, et al. Neuronal units linked to microvascular modules in cerebral cortex: response elements for imaging the brain. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6:647-660.
24. Moore CI, Stern CE, Corkin S, et al. Segregation of somatosensory activation in the human rolandic cortex using fMRI. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84:558-569.
25. Crépel V, Krnjević K, Ben-Ari Y. Sulphonylureas reduce the slowly inactivating D-type outward current in rat hippocampal neurons. J Physiol 1993; 466:39-54.
26. Lovick TA, Brown LA, Key BJ. Neuronal activity-related coupling in cortical arterioles: involvement of astrocyte-derived factors. Exp Physiol 2005; 90:131-140.