Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in mammography: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a new algorithm (Cyclopus®, Medicad) with two commercial systems;Diagnosi assistita da computer (CAD) in mammografia. Confronto di accuratezza diagnostica di un nuovo algoritmo (Cyclopus®, Medical) con due sistemi commerciali

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 626-635

  Ciatto, S ^a   Cascio, D ^b   Fauci, F ^b   Magro, R ^b   Raso, G ^b   Ienzi, R ^c   Martinelli, F ^a   Simone, M Vasile ^d  

^a Osservatorio Nazionale Screening   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^c Istituto di Radiologia   (Italy)

^d MEDICAD Srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Computer assisted diagnosis; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67650744843     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0396-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. R.L. Bennett R.G. Blanks S.M. Moss 2006 Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: a review of the literature Clin Radiol 61 1023 1028 (Pubitemid 44688726)
2. P. Taylor H.W.W. Potts 2008 Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate Eur J Cancer 44 798 807
3. J.J. Fenton S.H. Taplin P.A. Carney 2007 Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography N Engl J Med 356 1399 1409 (Pubitemid 46556325)
4. S. Ciatto M. Rosselli Del Turco G. Risso 2003 Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography Eur J Radiol 45 135 138 (Pubitemid 36092135)
5. S. Ciatto B. Brancato M. Rosselli Del Turco 2003 Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography Radiol Med 106 59 65 (Pubitemid 37254342)
6. T.W. Freer M.J. Ulissey 2001 Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center Radiology 220 781 786 (Pubitemid 32799990)
7. M.A. Helvie L. Hadjiiski E. Makariou 2004 Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial Radiology 231 208 214 (Pubitemid 38375430)
8. S. Ciatto D. Ambrogetti R. Bonardi 2004 Comparison of two commercial systems for computer aided detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms Radiol Med 107 480 488 (Pubitemid 38937526)
9. Paci E, Crocetti E, Miccinesi G et al (eds) (2002) Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. VIII. IARC Scientific Publications n. 155, Lyon
10. Perry NM, Broeders M, de Wolf C et al (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. European Commission, Luxembourg
11. Cascio D, Fauci F, Magro R, Raso G (2007) Method for processing biomedical images. PCT/IB2007/051282. MEDICAD srl., 2007
12. N. Houssami L. Irwig S. Ciatto 2006 Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes Lancet Oncol 7 259 265 (Pubitemid 43286455)
13. R. Gabe S.W. Duffy 2005 Evaluation of service screening mammography in practice: the impact on breast cancer mortality Annals Oncology 16 153 162
14. D.M. Roder N. Houssami G. Farshid 2008 Population screening and intensity of screening are associated with reduced breast cancer mortality: evidence of efficacy of mammography screening in Australia Breast Cancer Res Treat 108 409 416
15. S. Ciatto M.R. Del Turco D. Morrone 1995 Independent double reading of screening mammograms J Med Screen 2 99 101
16. R.G. Blanks M.G. Wallis S.M. Moss 1998 A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme J Med Screen 5 195 201 (Pubitemid 29035310)
17. D. Gur J.H. Sumkin H.E. Rockette 2004 Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system J Natl Cancer Inst 96 185 190 (Pubitemid 38263177)
18. L.A. Khoo P. Taylor R.M. Given-Wilson 2005 Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study Radiology 237 444 449 (Pubitemid 41507878)
19. R.L. Birdwell P. Bandodkar D.M. Ikeda 2005 Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting Radiology 236 451 457 (Pubitemid 41023425)
20. T.E. Cupples J.E. Cunningham J.C. Reynolds 2005 Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 944 950
21. J.M. Ko M.J. Nicholas J.B. Mendel P.J. Slanetz 2006 Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 1483 1491 (Pubitemid 44788678)
22. M.J. Morton D.H. Whaley K.R. Brandt K.K. Amrami 2006 Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection - prospective evaluation Radiology 239 375 383
23. S. Ciatto M. Rosselli Del Turco M. Zappa 1995 The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography Br J Cancer 71 337 339