Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes

Lancet Oncology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 259-265

  Houssami, Nehmat ^a,b   Irwig, Les ^a   Ciatto, Stefano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CANCER RESEARCH AND PREVENTION INSTITUTE ISPO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SCHEDULING; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33344472498     PISSN: 14702045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70617-9     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. IARC IARC handbooks of cancer prevention: Breast cancer screening 2002 International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon
2. N Day J McCann C Camilleri-Ferrante et al. Monitoring interval cancers in breast screening programmes: The East Anglian experience J Med Screen 2 1995 180-185
3. NE Day The NHS breast cancer screening programme Br J Cancer 89 2003 1
4. R Warren S Duffy Interval cancers as an indicator of performance in breast screening Breast Cancer 7 2000 9-18
5. R Taylor R Supramaniam M Rickard et al. Interval breast cancers in New South Wales, Australia, and comparisons with trials and other mammographic screening programmes J Med Screen 9 2002 20-25
6. D Everington FJ Gilbert C Tyack J Warner The Scottish breast screening programme's experience of monitoring interval cancers J Med Screen 6 1999 21-27
7. DS Buist PL Porter C Lehman et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years J Natl Cancer Inst 96 2004 1432-1440
8. RM Warren JR Young L McLean et al. Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: Potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signs Clin Radiol 58 2003 128-132
9. D Koivunen X Zhang C Blackwell et al. Interval breast cancers are not biologically distinct: Just more difficult to diagnose Am J Surg 168 1994 538-542
10. J Frisell A von Rosen M Wiege et al. Interval cancer and survival in a randomized breast cancer screening trial in Stockholm Breast Cancer Res Treat 24 1992 11-16
11. LH Holmberg L Tabar HO Adami R Bergstrom Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations Lancet 2 1986 27-30
12. CT Brekelmans PH Peeters JJ Deurenberg HJ Collette Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme Eur J Cancer 31A 1995 1830-1835
13. NHS Breast Screening Radiologists Quality Assurance Committee Quality assurance guidelines for breast cancer screening radiology (NHSBSP publication no 59) 2005 NHS Cancer Screening Programmes Sheffield
14. NHS Breast Screening Radiologists Quality Assurance Committee Quality assurance guidelines for radiologists (NHSBSP publication no 15) 1997 NHS Breast Screening Program Sheffield
15. K Gower-Thomas HM Fielder L Branston et al. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent? Clin Radiol 57 2002 384-388
16. PD Britton J McCann D O'Driscoll et al. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: Implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme Clin Radiol 56 2001 44-49
17. AF Amos AM Kavanagh J Cawson Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme J Med Screen 7 2000 184-189
18. JM De Rijke LJ Schouten JL Schreutelkamp et al. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands J Med Screen 7 2000 19-23
19. K Moberg H Grundström S Törnberg et al. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers J Med Screen 6 1999 35-39
20. AA Duncan MG Wallis Classifying interval cancers Clin Radiol 50 1995 774-777
21. JA Harvey LL Fajardo CA Innis Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: Retrospective vs blinded interpretation AJR Am J Roentgenol 161 1993 1167-1172
22. K Moberg N Bjurstam B Wilczek et al. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers Eur J Radiol 39 2001 104-110
23. D Asbury CR Boggis D Sheals et al. NHS breast screening programme: Is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable? BMJ 313 1996 1369-1370
24. B Vitak Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland Mammographic Screening Programme: Radiological analysis Eur Radiol 8 1998 639-646
25. DM Ikeda I Andersson C Wattsgard et al. Interval carcinomas in the Malmo Mammographic Screening Trial: Radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations AJR Am J Roentgenol 159 1992 287-294
26. S Ciatto M Rosseli Del Turco M Zappa The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography Br J Cancer 71 1995 337-339
27. R Warren P Allgood G Hunnam et al. An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result J Med Screen 11 2004 180-186
28. RG Blanks MG Wallis SM Moss A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: Results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme J Med Screen 5 1998 195-201
29. B Mucci G Athey G Scarisbrick Double read screening mammograms: The use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreements Breast 8 1999 37-39
30. HE Deans D Everington C Cordiner et al. Scottish experience of double reading in the National Breast Screening Programme Breast 7 1998 75-79
31. S Ciatto MR Del Turco D Morrone et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms J Med Screen 2 1995 99-101
32. E Anderson B Muir J Walsh A Kirkpatrick The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening Clin Radiol 49 1994 248-251
33. EL Thurfjell KA Lernevall AS Taube Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program Radiology 191 1994 241-244
34. RM Given-Wilson RG Blanks Incident screening cancers detected with a second mammographic view: Pathological and radiological features Clin Radiol 54 1999 724-735
35. RG Blanks RM Given-Wilson SM Moss Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: Two versus one view mammography J Med Screen 5 1998 141-145
36. K Young M Wallis R Blanks S Moss Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: Results from the NHS Breast Screening Programme Br J Radiol 70 1997 482-488
37. RG Blanks SM Moss MG Wallis Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: Further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme J Med Screen 4 1997 98-101
38. NJ Wald P Murphy P Major et al. UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening BMJ 311 1995 1189-1193
39. S Ciatto D Ambrogetti S Catarzi et al. Proficiency test for screening mammography: Results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists J Med Screen 6 1999 149-151
40. L Kan IA Olivotto LJ Warren Burhenne et al. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program Radiology 215 2000 563-567
41. F Schmidt K Hartwagner E Spork R Groell Medical audit after 26,711 breast imaging studies improved rate of detection of small breast carcinomas (classified as Tis or T1a,b) Cancer 83 1998 2516-2520
42. L Irwig N Houssami C van Vliet New technologies in screening for breast cancer: A systematic review of their accuracy Br J Cancer 90 2004 2118-2122
43. S Ciatto MR Del Turco G Risso et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography Eur J Radiol 45 2003 135-138
44. P Taylor RM Given-Wilson Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices Br J Radiol 78 2005 S26-S30
45. P Taylor J Champness R Given-Wilson et al. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms Br J Radiol 77 2004 21-27
46. J Frisell G Eklund L Hellstrom A Somell Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm Breast Cancer Res Treat 9 1987 219-225
47. PA Sylvester E Kutt A Baird et al. Rate and classification of interval cancers in the breast screening programme Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79 1997 276-277
48. S Field MJ Michell MG Wallis AR Wilson What should be done about interval breast cancers? BMJ 310 1995 203-204
49. Irwig L, Houssami N, Glasziou P, Armstrong B. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer may require randomised controlled trials to assess overdetection. BMJ (in press).
50. L Liberman Breast cancer screening with MRI: What are the data for patients at high risk? N Engl J Med 351 2004 497-500
51. MO Leach CR Boggis AK Dixon et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: A prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) Lancet 365 2005 1769-1778
52. ED Pisano C Gatsonis E Hendrick et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 2005 1773-1783
53. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1081-1087
54. S Ciatto C Visioli E Paci M Zappa Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening Br J Cancer 90 2004 393-396