Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms;Confronto di due sistemi commerciali per l'analisi computerizzata di immagine (CAD) in ausilio alla interpretazione della mammografia di screening

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 107, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 480-488

  Ciatto, Stefano ^a   Ambrogetti, Daniela ^a   Bonardi, Rita ^a   Brancato, Beniamino ^a   Catarzi, Sandra ^a   Risso, Gabriella ^a   Rosselli Del Turco, Marco ^a  

^a CANCER RESEARCH AND PREVENTION INSTITUTE ISPO   (Italy)

Author keywords

CAD; Diagnosis; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3142657968     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ: Potential contribution of computer aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215: 554-562, 2000.
2. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ: Screening mammography with computer aided detection: prospective study of 12.860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220: 1781-786, 2001.
3. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M et al: Tumor detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 11: 2454-2459, 2001.
4. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Risso G et al: Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 45: 135-138, 2003.
5. Ciatto S, Brancatro B, Rosselli Del Turco M et al: Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography. Radiol Med (in press).
6. Lechner M, Nelson M, Elvecrog R: Comparison of two commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. Applied Radiology 31: 31-35, 2002.
7. Shile PE, Guingrich JA: Detecting "missed" breast cancers: a comparison of CAD systems. Applied Radiology 31(Suppl):1-3, 2002.
8. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammographic Screening. Perry N. Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S (eds.), 3rd edition. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 155-158, 2001.
9. Brancato B, Ciatto S, Bricolo D et al: Valutazione dell'impatto della doppia lettura da parte di lettori esperti in un'indagine mammografia di massa. Radiol Med 100: 21-23, 2000.
10. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Hoffmeister J et al: Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance, histology and lesion size. Radiology 217: 400, 2000.
11. Bazzocchi M, Facecchia I, Zuiani C et al: Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications. Radiol Med 101: 334-430, 2001.