Reproductive biology of Datura wrightii: The benefits of a herbivorous pollinator

Annals of Botany

Volumn 103, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1435-1443

  Bronstein, Judith L ^a   Huxman, Travis ^a   Horvath, Brianna ^b   Farabee, Michael ^c   Davidowitz, Goggy ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Estrella Mountain Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

Agave palmeri; Datura wrightii; herbivory; mutualism; pollination

Indexed keywords

AGAVE PALMERI; DATURA WRIGHTII; LEPIDOPTERA; MANDUCA SEXTA; SOLANACEAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DATURA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUIT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; DATURA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUIT; MOTHS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 67650732898     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp053     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adler LS, Bronstein JL. 2004. Attracting antagonists: does floral nectar increase leaf herbivory? Ecology 85: 1519-1526.
2. Alarcón R, Davidowitz G, Bronstein JL. 2008. Nectar usage in a southern Arizona hawkmoth community. Ecological Entomology 33: 503-509.
3. Andersson S. 1999. The cost of floral attractants in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae): evidence from a ray removal experiment. Plant Biology 1:5 69-572.
4. Andersson S. 2000. The cost of flowers in Nigella degenii inferred from flower and perianth removal experiments. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 903-908.
5. Bernays EA, Woods HA. 2000. Foraging in nature by larvae of Manduca sexta-influenced by an endogenous oscillation. Journal of Insect Physiology 46: 825-836.
6. Bronstein JL. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 214-217.
7. Bronstein JL. 2001. The costs of mutualism. American Zoologist 41: 127-141.
8. Bronstein JL, Barbosa P. 2002. Multitrophic/multispecies mutualistic interactions: the role of non-mutualists in shaping and mediating mutualisms. In: Hawkins B, Tsharntke T, eds. Multitrophic level interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 44-65.
9. Bronstein JL, Alarcón R, Geber M. 2006. Tansley Review: Evolution of insect/plant mutualisms. New Phytologist 172: 412-428.
10. Bronstein JL, Huxman TE, Davidowitz G. 2007. Plant-mediated effects linking herbivory and pollination. In: Ohgushi T, Craig TG, Price PW eds. Ecological communities: plant mediation in indirect interaction webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79-103.
11. Casey TM. 1976. Activity patterns, body temperature and thermal ecology in two desert caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Ecology 57: 485-497.
12. Davidowitz G, D'Amico LJ, Nijhout HF. 2003. Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evolution & Development 5: 188-197.
13. Davidowitz G, D'Amico LJ, Nijhout HF. 2004. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 49-62.
14. Dedej S, Delaplane KS. 2004. Nectar-robbing carpenter bees reduce seedsetting capability of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in rabbiteye blueberry, Vaccinium ashei, 'Climax'. Ecological Entomology 33: 100-106.
15. Dufaÿ M, Anstett M-C. 2003. Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences: evolutionary variations on a theme. Oikos 100: 3-14.
16. Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Valido A, Olesen JM. 2004. Impact of introduced honey bees on native pollination interactions of the endemic Echium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) on Tenerife, Canary Islands. Biological Conservation 118: 301-311.
17. Elle E, Hare JD. 2002. Environmentally-induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii. Functional Ecology 16: 79-88.
18. Ferrierè R, Gauduchon M, Bronstein JL. 2007. Evolution and persistence of obligate mutualists and exploiters: competition for partners and evolutionary immunization. Ecology Letters 10: 115-126.
19. Fleming TH, Holland JN. 1998. The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 114: 368-375.
20. Galen C, Cuba J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55: 1963-1971.
21. Galen C, Sherry RA, Carroll AB. 1999. Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 118: 461-470.
22. Grant V, Grant K. 1983. Behavior of hawkmoths on flowers of Datura meteloides. Botanical Gazette 144: 280-284.
23. Guerenstein PG, Yepez EA, van Haren J, Williams DG, Hildebrand JG. 2004. Floral CO2 emission may indicate food abundance to nectarfeeding moths. Naturwissenschaften 91: 329-333.
24. Hare JD, Elle E. 2002. Variable impact of diverse insect herbivores on dimorphic Datura wrightii. Ecology 83: 2711-2720.
25. Heinrich B. 1971. The effect of leaf geometry on the feeding behavior of the caterpillar of Manduca sexta (Sphingidae). Animal Behavior 19: 119-124.
26. Herre EA, Jandér KC, Machado CA. 2008. Evolutionary ecology of figs and their associates: recent progress and outstanding puzzles. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 439-458.
27. Herrera CM. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81: 2170-2176.
28. Holland JN. 2002. Benefits and costs of mutualism: demographic consequences in a pollinating seed-consumer interaction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269: 1405-1412.
29. Holland JN, Fleming TH. 1999. Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seed-consumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactaceae). Ecology 80: 2074-2084.
30. Irwin RE, Adler LS. 2006. Correlations among traits associated with herbivore resistance and pollination: implications for pollination and nectar robbing in a distylous plant. American Journal of Botany 93: 64-72.
31. Johnson SD, Peter CJ, Agren J. 2004. The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271: 803-809.
32. Kearney TH, Peebles RH. 1960. Arizona flora. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33. Kester KM, Peterson SC, Hanson F, Jackson DM, Severson RF. 2002. The roles of nicotine and natural enemies in determining larval feeding site distributions of Manduca sexta L. And Manduca quinquemaculata (Haworth) on tobacco. Chemoecology 12: 1-10.
34. Kobayashi S, Inouye K, Kato M. 1999. Mechanism of selection favoring a wide tubular corolla in Campanula punctata. Evolution 53: 752-757.
35. McCall AC, Irwin RE. 2006. Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecology Letters 9: 1351-1365.
36. McFadden MW. 1968. Observations on feeding and movement of tobacco hornworm larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology 61: 352-356.
37. Madden AH, Chamberlin FS. 1945. Biology of the tobacco hornworm in the southern cigar tobacco district. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 896.
38. Mechaber WL, Hildebrand JG. 2000. Novel, non-solanaceous hostplant record for Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera:Sphingidae) in the southwestern United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 447-451.
39. Medina A. 2003. Historical and recent flora of the Santa Rita Experimental Range. In: McClaran MP, Ffolliott PF, Edminster CB, eds. Santa Rita Experimental Range: 100 years (1903-2003) of accomplishments and contributions, Vol. RMRS-P-30. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, Tucson, AZ, 141-148.
40. Mira A, Bernays EA. 2002. Trade-offs in host use by Manduca sexta: plant characters vs natural enemies. Oikos 97: 387-397.
41. Morales CL, Traveset A. 2008. Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27: 221-238.
42. Muñoz AA, Cavieres LA. 2008. The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. Journal of Ecology 96: 459-467.
43. Ness JH, Bressmer K. 2005. Abiotic influences on the behaviour of rodents, ants, and plants affect an ant-seed mutualism. Ecoscience 12:76-81.
44. Pellmyr O. 1989. The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia 78: 53-59.
45. Pellmyr O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: A review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 35-55.
46. Pyke GH. 1991. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350: 58-59.
47. Raguso RA. 2008. Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128: 196-207.
48. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2002. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naive hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Animal Behaviour 64: 685-695.
49. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2005. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Animal Behaviour 69: 407-418.
50. Raguso RA, Henzel C, Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. 2003. Trumpet flowers of the Sonoran Desert: floral biology of Peniocereus cacti and sacred Datura. International Journal of Plant Science 164: 877-892.
51. Riffell JA, Alarcón R, Abrell L, Davidowitz G, Bronstein JL, Hildebrand JG. 2008. Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth-flower interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 3404-3409.
52. Sakai S. 2002. A review of brood-site pollination mutualism: plants providing breeding sites for their pollinators. Journal of Plant Research 115: 161-168.
53. Schatz B, Proffit M, Rakhi BV, Borges RM, Hossaert-McKey M. 2006. Complex interactions on fig trees: ants capturing parasitic wasps as possible indirect mutualists of the fig-fig wasp interaction. Oikos 113: 344-352.
54. Scott PE. 2004. Timing of Agave palmeri flowering and nectar-feeding bat visitation in the Peloncillos and Chiricahua Mountains. Southwestern Naturalist 49: 425-434.
55. Shykoff JA, Bucheli E. 1995. Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. Journal of Ecology 83: 189-198.
56. Slauson LA. 2000. Pollination biology of two chiropterophilous agaves in Arizona. American Journal of Botany 87: 825-836.
57. Tang LL, Huang S-Q. 2007. Evidence for reductions in floral attractants with increased selfing rates in two heterandrous species. New Phytologist 175: 588-595.
58. Thakar JD, Kunte K, Chauhan AK, Watve AV, Watve MG. 2003. Nectarless flowers: ecological correlates and evolutionary stability. Oecologia 136: 565-570.
59. Thom C, Guerenstein PG, Mechaber WL, Hildebrand JG. 2004. Floral CO2 reveals flower profitability to moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 1285-1288.
60. Westerbergh A. 2004. An interaction between a specialized seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism. Oikos 105: 564-574.
61. Young HJ, Young TP. 1992. Alternative outcomes of natural and experimental high pollen loads. Ecology 73: 639-647.