Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences: Evolutionary variations on a theme

Oikos

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-14

  Dufaÿ, Mathilde ^a   Anstett, Marie Charlotte ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; MUTUALISM; POLLINATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037569428     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12053.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (83)

1. Addicott, J. F. 1986. Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: the interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. - Oecologia 70: 486-494.
2. Addicott, J. F. 1996. Cheaters in yucca/moth mutualism. - Nature 380: 114-115.
3. Addicott, J. F. and Tyre, A. J. 1995. Cheating in an obligate mutualism: how often do yucca moths benefit yuccas? - Oikos 72: 382-394.
4. Ågren, J., Elmqvist, T. and Tunlid, A. 1986. Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. - Oecologia 70: 332-338.
5. Aker, C. L. and Udovic, D. 1981. Oviposition and pollination behavior of the yucca moth, Tegeticula maculata, (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) and its relation to the preoructive biology of Yucca whipplei (Agavacae). - Oecologia 49: 96-101.
6. Anstett, M.-C. 1999. An experimental study of the interaction between the dwarf palm (Chamaerops humilis) and its floral visitor Derelomus chamaeropsis throughout the life cycle of the weevil. - Acta Oecologica 20: 551-558.
7. Anstett, M.-C. 2001. Unbeatable strategy, constraint and coevolution, or how to resolve evolutionary conflicts: the case of the fig/fig wasp mutualism. - Oikos 95: 476-484.
8. Anstett, M.-C., Hossaert-McKey, M. and Kjellberg, F. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 94-99.
9. Anstett, M.-C., Gibernau, M. and Hossaert-McKey, M. 1998. Partial avoidance of female inflorescences of a dioecious fig by their mutualistic pollinating wasps. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265: 45-50.
10. Appanah, S. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in Malaysian rain forests. - In: Bawa, K. S. and Hadley, M. (eds), Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. Unesco, Paris, pp. 85-102.
11. Armbruster, W. S. 1997. Exaptations link evolution of plant-herbivore and plant-pollinator interactions: a phylogenetic inquiry. - Ecology 78: 1661-1672.
12. Bao, T. and Addicott, J. F. 1998. Cheating in mutualism: defection of Yucca baccata against its yucca moths. - Ecol. Lett. 1: 155-159.
13. Bawa, K. S. and Crisp, J. E. 1980. Wind-pollination in the understorey of a rain forest in Costa Rica. - J. Ecol. 68: 871-876.
14. Boucher, D. H., James, S. and Keeler, K. H. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 315-347.
15. Brody, A. K. and Morita, S. I. 2000. A positive association between oviposition and fruit set: female choice or manipulation? - Oecologia 124: 418-425.
16. Bronstein, J. L. 1994a. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 214-217.
17. Bronstein, J. L. 1994b. Our current understanding of mutualism. - Q. Rev. Biol. 69: 31-51.
18. Bronstein, J. L. 2001. The exploitation of mutualisms. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 277-284.
19. Compton, S. G., Holton, K. C., Rashbrook, V. K. et al. 1991. Studies of Ceratosolen galili, a non-pollinating agaonid fig wasp. - Biotropica 23: 188-194.
20. Connor, R. C. 1995. The benefits of mutualism: a conceptual framework. - Biol. Rev. 70: 427-457.
21. Desfeux, C., Maurice, S., Henry, J. P. et al. 1996. Evolution of reproductive systems in the genus Silene. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263: 409-414.
22. Despres, L. and Jaeger, N. 1999. Evolution of oviposition strategies and speciation in the globe-flower flies Chiastocheta spp. (Anthomyiidae). - J. Evol. Biol. 12: 822-831.
23. Dukas, R. 1987. Foraging behavior of three bee species in a natural mimicry system: female flowers which mimic male flowers in Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae). - Oecologia 74: 256-263.
24. Feil, J. P. 1992. Reproductive ecology of dioecious Siparuna (Monimiaceae) in Ecuador - a case of gall midge pollination. - Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 110: 171-203.
25. Fleming, T. H. and Holland, J. N. 1998. The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth. - Oecologia 114: 368-375.
26. Galil, J. and Eisikowitch, D. 1968. Pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus in East Africa. - Ecology 49: 260-269.
27. Galil, J. and Eisikowitch, D. 1969. Further studies on the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus L. (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). - Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 112: 1-13.
28. Ganeshaiah, K. N., Kathuria, P., Shaanker, R. U. and Vasudeva, R. 1995. Evolution of style-length variability in figs and optimization of ovipositor length in their pollinator wasps: a coevolutionary model. - J. Genet. 74: 25-39.
29. Gibernau, M., Hossaert-McKey, M., Anstett, M.-C. and Kjellberg, F. 1996. Consequences of protecting flowers in a fig: a one-way trip for pollinators? - J. Biogeogr. 23: 425-432.
30. Grison-Pigé L., Bessiere, J. M., Turlings, T. C. J. et al. 2001. Limited intersex mimicry of floral odour in Ficus carica. Funct. Ecol. 15: 551-558.
31. Henderson, A. 1986. A review of pollination studies in the Palmae. - Bot. Rev. 52: 221-259.
32. Herre, E. A. 1989. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. - Experientia 45: 637-647.
33. Herre, E. A., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U. G. and Rehner, S. A. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflicts and cooperation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 49-53.
34. Holland, J. N. 2002. Benefits and costs of mutualism: demographic consequences in a pollinating seed-consumer interaction. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 1405-1412.
35. Holland, J. N. and Fleming, T. H. 1999. Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seed-consumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactacae). Ecology 80: 2074-2084.
36. Holland, J. N. and DeAngelis, D. L. 2001. Population dynamics and the ecological stability of obligate pollination mutualisms. - Oecologia 126: 575-586.
37. Humphries, S. A. and Addicott, J. F. 2000. Regulation of the mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths: intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting flower retention. - Oikos 89: 329-339.
38. Hutch, C. J. and Pellmyr, O. 1997. Non-random fruit retention in Yucca filamentosa: consequences for an obligate mutualism. - Oikos 78: 576-584.
39. Hutch, C. J. and Pellmyr, O. 2000. Pollen-mediated selective abortion in yuccas and its consequences for the plant-pollinator mutualism. - Ecology 81: 1100-1107.
40. Irvine, A. K. and Armstrong, J. E. 1990. Beetle pollination in tropical forests of Australia. - In: Bawan, K. S. and Hadley, M. (eds), Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. Unesco, Paris, pp. 135-150.
41. Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and tinkering. - Science 196: 1161-1166.
42. Jaeger, N., Till-Bottraud, I. and Despres, L. 2000. Evolutionary conflicts between Trollius europaeus and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 1-12.
43. Janzen, D. H. 1983. Seed and pollen dispersal by animals: convergence in the ecology of contamination and sloppy harvest. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20: 103-113.
44. Jousselin, E. and Kjellberg, F. 2001. The functional implications of active and passive pollination in dioecious figs. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 151-158.
45. Jürgens, A., Witt, T. and Gottsberger, G. 1996. Reproduction and pollination in Central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. - Bot. Acta 109: 316-324.
46. Kathuria, P. 1999. The pollination biology of monoecious fig trees in India. - PhD thesis, Univ. of Leeds, UK.
47. Kerdelhué, C., Le Clainche, I. and Rasplus, J.-Y. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the Ceratosolen species pollinating Ficus of the subgenus Sycomorus sensus stricto: biogeographical history and origins of the species-specific breakdown cases. - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 401-414.
48. Kjellberg, F., Ibrahim, M., Raymond, M. and Valdeyron, G. 1987. The stability of the symbiosis between dioecious figs and their pollinators: a study of Ficus carica L. and Blastophaga psenes L. - Evolution 41: 693-704.
49. Kjellberg, F., Jousselin, E., Bronstein, J. L. et al. 2001. Pollination mode in fig wasps: the predictive power of correlated traits. - Proc. R. Soc. London B. 268: 1113-1121.
50. Law, R., Bronstein, J. L. and Ferriere, R. 2001. On mutualists and exploiters: plant-insect coevolution in pollinating seed-parasite systems. - J. Theor. Biol. 212: 373-389.
51. Machado, C. A., Jousselin, E., Kjellberg, F. et al. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 685-694.
52. Moegenburg, S. M. 1996. Sabal palmetto seed size: causes of variation, choices of predators, and consequences for seedlings. - Oecologia 106: 539-543.
53. Moog, U., Fiala, B., Federle, W. and Maschwitz, U. 2002. Thrips pollination of the dioecious ant plant Macaranga hullettii (Euphorbiaceae) in Southern Asia. - Am. J. Bot. 89: 50-59.
54. Nefdt, R. J. C. and Compton, S. G. 1996. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 170-182.
55. Nilsson, L. A. 1992. Orchid pollination biology. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 255-259.
56. Insect-cyead symbiosis and its relation to the pollination of Zamia furfuracea (Zamiaceae) by Rhopalotria mollis (Curculionidae). - Am. J. Bot. 76: 1380-1394.
57. Norstog, K. J., Fawcett, P. K. S. and Vovides, A. P. 1992. Beetle pollination of two species of Zamia: evolutionary and ecological considerations. - Palaeobotanist 41: 149-158.
58. Patel, A., Anstett, M.-C., Kjellberg, F. and Hossaert-McKey, M. 1995. Pollinators entering female dioecious figs: why commit suicide? - J. Evol. Biol. 8: 301-314.
59. Pellmyr, O. 1989. The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. - Oecologia 78: 53-59.
60. Pellmyr, O. 1997. Pollinating seed eaters: why is active pollination so rare? - Ecology 78: 1655-1660.
61. Pellmyr, O. and Hutch, C. J. 1994. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. - Nature 372: 257-260.
62. Pellmyr, O. and Leebens-Mack, J. 2000. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. - Am. Nat. 156: S62-S76.
63. Pellmyr, O. and Thompson, J. N. 1992. Multiple occurrences of mutualism in the yucca moth lineage. - Proc. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2927-2929.
64. Pellmyr, O., Leebens-Mack, J. and Hutch, C. J. 1996a. Non mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. - Nature 380: 155-156.
65. Pellmyr, O., Thompson, J. T., Brown, J. M. and Harrison, R. G. 1996b. Evolution of pollination and mutualism in the yucca moth lineage. - Am. Nat. 148: 827-847.
66. Pettersson, M. W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. - J. Ecol. 79: 591-604.
67. Pettersson, M. W. 1992. Pollination, oviposition and seed predation by flower visiting insects in bladder campions (Silene vulgaris S.L., Caryophyllaceae). - PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden.
68. Powell, J. A. 1992. Inter-relationships of yuccas and yucca moths. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 10-15.
69. Riley, C. V. 1892. The yucca moth and yucca pollination. - Annu. Rep. Mo. Bot. Garden 32: 99-159.
70. Roy, B. A. and Widmer, A. 1999. Floral mimicry: a fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon. - Trends Plant Sci. 4: 325-330.
71. Schatz, G. E. 1990. Some aspects of pollination biology in Central American forests. - In: Bawa, K. S. and Hadley, M. (eds), Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. Unesco, Paris, pp. 69-84.
72. Shykoff, J. A. and Bucheli, E. 1995. Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. - J. Ecol. 83: 189-198.
73. Tang, W. 1987. Insect pollination in the cycad Zamia pumila (Zamiaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 74: 90-99.
74. Thompson, J. N. 1982. Interaction and coevolution. - J. Wiley and Sons.
75. Thompson, J. N. and Pellmyr, O. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. - Ecology 73: 1780-1791.
76. Tyre, A. J. and Addicott, J. F. 1993. Facultative non-mutualistic behaviour by an "obligate" mutualist: "cheating" by yucca moths. - Oecologia 94: 173-175.
77. Uhl, N. W. and Dransfield, J. 1987. Genera Palmarum. - Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
78. Verkerke, W. 1989. Structure and function of the fig. - Experientia 45: 612-622.
79. West, S. A. and Herre, E. A. 1994. The ecology of the New World fig-parasitizing wasps Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 258: 67-72.
80. Wiebes, J. T. 1979. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 1-10.
81. Wilkinson, D. M. 2001. Horizontally acquired mutualisms, an unsolved problem in ecology? - Oikos 92: 377-384.
82. Wilson, R. D. and Addicott, J. F. 1998. Regulation of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths: is oviposition behavior responsive to selective abscission of flowers? - Oikos 81: 109-118.
83. Ziv, Y. and Bronstein, J. L. 1996. Infertile seeds of Yucca schottii: a beneficial role for the plant in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism? - Evol. Ecol. 10: 63-76.