The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Zhu, Qi ^a   Li, Xiaobai ^a   Chow, Kari ^a   Liu, Jia ^a,b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FACE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PROSOPAGNOSIA; RECOGNITION; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; VISION;

FACE; HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 67650676007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006239     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Freire A, Lee K, Symons LA (2000) The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 29: 159-170.
2. Yovel G, Kanwisher N (2004) Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44: 889-898.
3. Yovel G, Duchaine B (2006) Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: Evidence from developmental Prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 580-593.
4. Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2001) Neuroperception - Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 410: 890-890.
5. Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2003) Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience 6: 1108-1112.
6. Duchaine BC (2006) Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology 23: 714-747.
7. Le Grand R, Cooper PA, Mondloch CJ, Lewis TL, Sagiv N, et al. (2006) What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? Brain and Cognition 61: 139-158.
8. Nishimura M, Rutherford MD, Maurer D (2008) Converging evidence of configural processing of faces in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders. Visual Cognition 16: 859-891.
9. Shin YW, Na MH, Ha TH, Kang DH, Yoo SY, et al. (2008) Dysfunction in configural face processing in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 34: 538-543.
10. Yovel G, Kanwisher N (2008) The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: Evidence from individual differences. Psychon Bull Rev 15: 933-939.
11. Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (1998) What is "special" about face perception? Psychol Rev 105: 482-498.
12. Tanaka JW, Farah MJ (1993) Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 46: 225-245.
13. Tanaka JW, Sengco JA (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cognit 25: 583-592.
14. Bartlett JC, Searcy J (1993) Inversion and configuration of faces. Cogn Psychol 25: 281-316.
15. Searcy JH, Bartlett JC (1996) Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 904-915.
16. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson AP (1993) What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 47: 25-57.
17. Macho S, Leder H (1998) Your eyes only? A test of interactive influence in the processing of facial features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 1486-1500.
18. Cabeza R, Kato T (2000) Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science 11: 429-433.
19. Leder H, Bruce V (2000) When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 53: 513-536.
20. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, et al. (2000) The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 495-504.
21. Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller AM, Lazeyras F, et al. (2003) A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain 126: 2381-2395.
22. Liu J, Harris A, Kanwisher N (2009) Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: An fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
23. Pitcher D, Walsh V, Yovel G, Duchaine B (2007) TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology 17: 1568-1573.
24. Young AW, Hellawell D, Hay DC (1987) Configurational information in face perception. Perception 16: 747-759.
25. Rossion B (2008) Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica 128: 274-289.
26. Riesenhuber M, Jarudi I, Gilad S, Sinha P (2004) Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271: S448-S450.
27. Butler PD, Tambini A, Yovel G, Jalbrzikowski M, Ziwich R, et al. (2008) What's in a face? Effects of stimulus duration and inversion on face processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 103: 283-292.
28. Barton JJ, Keenan JP, Bass T (2001) Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: effects of inversion and viewing duration. Br J Psychol 92: 527-549.
29. Mondloch CJ, Le Grand R, Maurer D (2002) Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception 31: 553-566.
30. Leder H, Carbon CC (2006) Face-specific configural processing of relational information. British Journal of Psychology 97: 19-29.
31. Rhodes G, Hayward WG, Winkler C (2006) Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 499-505.
32. Goffaux V, Rossion B (2007) Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 995-1002.
33. Hosie JA, Ellis HD, Haig ND (1988) The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces. Perception 17: 461-474.
34. Goffaux V, Hault B, Michel C, Vuong QC, Rossion B (2005) The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception 34: 77-86.
35. Goffaux V, Rossion B (2006) Faces are "spatial"-holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 1023-1039.
36. Goffaux V (2008) The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges. Acta Psychologica 128: 119-126.
37. Boutet I, Collin C, Faubert J (2003) Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information. Perception & Psychophysics 65: 1078-1093.
38. Collin CA, Liu CH, Troje NF, McMullen PA, Chaudhuri A (2004) Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology- Human Perception and Performance 30: 975-987.
39. Gaspar C, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ (2008) Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Vision Research 48: 2817-2826.
40. Kress T, Daum I (2003) Developmental prosopagnosia: A review. Behavioural Neurology 14: 109-121.
41. Behrmann M, Avidan G (2005) Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 180-187.
42. Duchaine BC, Nakayama K (2006) Developmental prosopagnosia: a window to content-specific face processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 166-173.
43. Kennerknecht I, Plumpe N, Edwards S, Raman R (2007) Hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA): the first report outside the Caucasian population. Journal of Human Genetics 52: 230-236.
44. Gruter T, Gruter M, Carbon CC (2008) Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia. J Neuropsychol 2: 79-97.
45. Duchaine B, Germine L, Nakayama K (2007) Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 24: 419-430.
46. Duchaine B, Yovel G, Nakayama K (2007) No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2: 104-113.
47. Brainard DH (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
48. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442.
49. Farkas LG (1981) Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine. New York: Elsevier.
50. Li XB, Song YY (2007) First congenital prosopagnosia case reported in China. Progress in Natural Science 17: 165-171.