Developing a model to measure financial condition in local government: Evaluating service quality and minimizing the effects of the socioeconomic environment: An application to Spanish municipalities

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 425-449

  Zafra Gómez, José Luis ^a   López Hernández, Antonio Manuel ^a   Hernández Bastida, Agustín ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Financial condition; Local government; Service quality; Social and economic environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650626750     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074008320710     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahmad, Y., & Broussine, M. (2003). The UK public sector modernization agenda. Public Management Review, 5(1), 45-62.
2. Ammons, D.N., Coe, C., & Lombardo, M. (2001). Performance-comparison projects in local government: Participants' perspectives. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 100-115.
3. Andalusian Autonomous Community. (2002). Modelos de financiación para la Administración Local [Finance models for local administration]. Consejería de Gobernación.
4. Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Law, J., & Enticott, G. (2006). Performance failure in the public sector. Misfortune or mismanagement? Public Management Review, 8(2), 273-296.
5. Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Law, J., & Walker, R.M. (2005). External constraints on local services standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. Public Administration, 83(3), 639-656.
6. Audit Commission. (2007). Use of resources. Guidance for councils. London: Author.
7. Australian Accounting Research Foundation. (1996). Financial reporting by local governments. Caulfield, Australia: Author.
8. Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451.
9. Barnett, R., Levaggi, R., & Smith, P. (1992). Local authority expenditure decisions-A maximum-likelihood analysis of budget setting in the face of piecewise linear budget constraints. Oxford Economic Papers, 44(1), 113-134.
10. Bergstrom, T.C., & Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demand for public goods. American Economic Review, 63, 280-296.
11. Berne, R. (1992). The relationships between financial reporting and the measurement of financial condition (Research Report No. 18). Norwalk, CT: Government Accounting Standards Board.
12. Berne, R., & Scharamm, R. (1986). The financial analysis of government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Borcherding, T., & Deacon, R. (1972). The demand for services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review, 62, 891-901.
14. Bowerman, M., Ball, D., & Francis, G. (2001). Benchmarking as a tool for the modernisation of local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(4), 321-329.
15. Boyne, G.A. (1996). Constraints, choice and public policies. London: JAI Press.
16. Boyne, G.A., Ashworth, R.E., & Powell, D.M. (2001). Environmental change, leadership succession and incrementalism in local government. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 859-878.
17. Boyne, G.A., & Enticott, G. (2004, January). Are the 'poor' different? The internal characteristics of local authorities in the five comprehensive performance assessment groups. Public Money & Management, pp. 11-18.
18. Broadbent, J. (2003, January). Comprehensive performance assessment: The crock of gold at the end of the performance rainbow? Public Money & Management, pp. 5-8.
19. Brooks, J. (2000). Labour's modernization of local government. Public Administration, 78(3), 593-612.
20. Brown, K.W. (1993). The 10-point test of financial condition: Toward an easy-to-use assessment tool for smaller cities. Government Finance Review, 9(6), 21-26.
21. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. (1997). Indicators of government financial condition. Toronto: Author.
22. Carmeli, A. (2002, Spring). A conceptual and practical framework of measuring performance of local authorities in financial terms: Analysing the case of Israel. Local Government Studies, 28(1), 21-36.
23. Carmeli, A. (2007). The effect of fiscal conditions of local government authorities on their economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 21(1), 91-98.
24. Carmeli, A., & Cohen, A. (2001). The financial crisis of the local authorities in Israel: A resource-based analysis. Public Administration, 79(4), 893-913.
25. Clark, T. (1990). Monitoring local governments. Dubuque, IA: Kendal Hunt.
26. Clark, T. (1994). Municipal fiscal strain: Indicator and causes. Government Finance Review, 10(3), 27-29.
27. Congleton, R.D. (2002). The median voter model. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Center for Study of Public Choice.
28. Copeland, R.E., & Ingram, R. (1983). Municipal financial reporting and disclosure quality. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Cutler, T., & Waine, B. (2003, April). Advancing public accountability? The social services 'star' ratings. Public Money & Management, pp. 125-128.
30. De Lancer, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
31. Directorate General for Financial Coordination with Local Authorities, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Finance. (1996- 1999). Madrid. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.meh.es/Portal/Administracion+Electronica/OVEntidadesLocales.htm
32. Directión Générale de Collectivités Locales. (1997). Guide des Ratios des Communes de Plus de 10,000 Habitants. París: Author.
33. Dollery, B., Crase, L., & Byrnes, J. (2006, September). Local government failure: Why does Australian local government experience permanent financial austerity? Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 339-353.
34. Donahue, A.K., & Miller, J.M. (2005). Citizen preferences and paying for police. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(4), 419-435.
35. Donahue, A.K., & Miller, J.M. (2006). Experiences, attitudes, and willingness to pay for public safety. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(4), 395-418.
36. Fleischman, A., & Green, G.P. (1991). Organizing local agencies to promote economic development. The American Review of Public Administration, 21(1), 1-15.
37. Folz, D. (2004). Service quality and benchmarking the performance of municipal services. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 209-220.
38. Gil-Ruiz, C.L., & Iglesias, J. (2007). El gasto público en España en un contexto descentralizado. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 47, 185-206.
39. Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1987). Concepts statement no. 1 of Governmental Accounting Standards Board: Objectives of financial reporting. Norwalk, CT: Author.
40. Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1999). Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 34: Basic financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for state and local governments. Norwalk, CT: Author.
41. Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (2004). Statement of Governmental Accounting Standards Board No. 44: Economic condition reporting; The statistical section-An amendment of NCGA statement 1. Norwalk, CT: Author.
42. Greenberg, J., & Hillier, D. (1995). Indicators of financial condition for governments. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research, Paris-Amy.
43. Groves, M., Godsey, W., & Shulman, M. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook of local government (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The International City/ County Management Association.
44. Hammer, R.B., & Green, G.P. (1996). Local growth promotion: Policy adoption versus effort. Economic Development Quarterly, 10(4), 331-341.
45. Hendrick, R. (1989). Top-down budgeting, fiscal stress and budgeting theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 29-48.
46. Hendrick, R. (2004). Assessing and measuring the fiscal health of local government. Focus on Chicago suburban municipalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(1), 78-114.
47. Honadle, B.W. (2003). The states' role in U.S. local government fiscal crises: A theoretical model and results of a national survey. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(13), 1431-1472.
48. Honadle, B.W., & Lloyd-Jones, M. (1998, Summer). Analyzing rural local governments' financial condition: An exploratory application of three tools. Public Budgeting and Finance, pp. 69-86.
49. Jacobs, R., & Goddard, M. (2007, April). How do performance indicators add up? An examination of composite indicators in public services. Public Money & Management, pp. 103-110.
50. Kloha, P., Weissert, C.S., & Kleine, R. (2005a). Developing and testing a composite model to predict local fiscal distress. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 313-323.
51. Kloha, P., Weissert, C.S. & Kleine, R. (2005b). Someone to watch over me. State monitoring of local fiscal conditions. The American Review of Public Administration, 35(3), 313-323.
52. Leone, R.C. (1976). The fiscal decline of older cities: Causes and cures. National Tax Journal, 29(3), 257-260.
53. Lewis, C.W. (1994). Budgetary balance: The norm, concept, and practice in large US cities. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 515-524.
54. Lindblad, M.R. (2006). Perfomance measurement in local economic development. Urban Affairs Review, 41(5), 646-672.
55. Mercer, T., & Gilbert, M. (1996). A financial condition index for Nova Scotia municipalities. Government Finance Review, 12(5), 36-38.
56. Midwinter, A. (2001). New labour and the modernisation of British local government: A critique. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(4), 311-320.
57. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. (2006). The financial information return (FIR). Toronto: Author.
58. Petersen, J.E. (1977, September). Simplification and standardisation of state and local government fiscal indicators. National Tax Journal, pp. 299-311.
59. Rivenbark, W. (2000). Benchmarking and cost accounting: The North Carolina approach. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 12(2), 125-137.
60. Ross, S., & Yinger, J. (1998). Sorting and voting: A review of the literature on urban public finance. In P. Cheshire & E. S. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of urban economics (pp. 2001-2060). New York: North-Holland.
61. Spanish Ministry for Public Administration. (2000). Encuesta de Infraestructura y Equipamiento. Madrid: Author.
62. Spanish Social & Commercial Yearbook. (1999). Barcelona: Studies Service "La Caixa."
63. Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
64. Wang, X., Dennis, L., & Sen, Y. (2007). Measuring financial condition: A study of U.S. states. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(2), 1-21.