Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring

FEBS Letters

Volumn 583, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 2365-2371

  Liu, Han ^a,b   Kovács, Eszter ^a,c   Lund, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c SOLVO BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Chaperonin; GroEL; GroES; Molecular chaperone; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN SR1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION TEST; GROEL PROTEIN; GROES PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SUBUNITS;

EID: 67650467983     PISSN: 00145793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.06.027     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fayet O., Ziegelhoffer T., and Georgopoulos C. The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171 (1989) 1379-1385
2. Thirumalai D., and Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30 (2001) 245-269
3. Ellis R.J. Chaperomics: in vivo GroEL function defined. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 661-663
4. Lin Z., and Rye H.S. GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41 (2006) 211-239
5. Horwich A.L., Fenton W.A., Chapman E., and Farr G.W. Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23 (2007) 115-145
6. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., and Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371 (1994) 578-586
7. Langer T., Pfeifer G., Martin J., Baumeister W., and Hartl F.U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11 (1992) 4757-4765
8. Braig K., Simon M., Furuya F., Hainfeld J.F., and Horwich A.L. A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin groEL is localized within a central cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 3978-3982
9. Weissman J.S., Hohl C.M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H.R., Fenton W.A., and Horwich A.L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83 (1995) 577-587
10. Mayhew M., da Silva A.C., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., and Hartl F.U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379 (1996) 420-426
11. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., and Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371 (1994) 614-619
12. Chen L., and Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 99 (1999) 757-768
13. Sharma S., Chakraborty K., Müller B.K., Astola N., Tang Y.C., Lamb D.C., Hayer-Hartl M., and Hartl F.U. Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 133 (2008) 142-153
14. Lin Z., Madan D., and Rye H.S. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15 (2008) 303-311
15. Rye H.S., Burston S.G., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., Xu Z., Sigler P.B., and Horwich A.L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388 (1997) 792-798
16. Weissman J.S., Rye H.S., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., and Horwich A.L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84 (1996) 481-490
17. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., and Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 379 (1996) 37-45
18. Xu Z., Horwich A.L., and Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric (GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388 (1997) 741-750
19. Yifrach O., and Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34 (1995) 5303-5308
20. Horovitz A., Fridmann Y., Kafri G., and Yifrach O. Review: allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135 (2001) 104-114
21. Nielsen K.L., and Cowan N.J. A single ring is sufficient for productive chaperonin-mediated folding in vivo. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 93-99
22. Viitanen P.V., Lorimer G., Bergmeier W., Weiss C., Kessel M., and Goloubinoff P. Purification of mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin 60 through in vitro reconstitution of active oligomers. Method Enzymol. 290 (1998) 203-217
23. Nielsen K.L., McLennan N., Masters M., and Cowan N.J. A single-ring mitochondrial chaperonin (Hsp60-Hsp10) can substitute for GroEL-GroES in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 181 (1999) 5871-5875
24. Levy-Rimler G., Viitanen P., Weiss C., Sharkia R., Greenberg A., Niv A., Lustig A., Delarea Y., and Azem A. The effect of nucleotides and mitochondrial chaperonin 10 on the structure and chaperone activity of mitochondrial chaperonin 60. Eur. J. Biochem. 268 (2001) 3465-3472
25. Chatellier J., Hill F., Foster N.W., Goloubinoff P., and Fersht A.R. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 304 (2000) 897-910
26. Sun Z., Scott D.J., and Lund P.A. Isolation and characterisation of mutants of GroEL that are fully functional as single rings. J. Mol. Biol. 332 (2003) 715-728
27. Richardson A., Schwager F., Landry S.J., and Georgopoulos C. The importance of a mobile loop in regulating chaperonin/co-chaperonin interaction: humans versus Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 4981-4987
28. Gibson, T.J. (1984) Studies on the Epstein-Bar virus genome. PhD Thesis. Cambridge University, UK.
29. McLennan N., and Masters M. GroE is vital for cell-wall synthesis. Nature 392 (1998) 139
30. McLennan N.F., Girshovich A.S., Lissin N.M., Charters Y., and Masters M. The strongly conserved carboxyl-terminus glycine-methionine motif of the Escherichia coli GroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol. Microbiol. 1 (1993) 49-58
31. Amann E., Ochs B., and Abel K.J. Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli. Gene 69 (1988) 301-315
32. Jones S., Wallington E.J., George R., and Lund P.A. An arginine residue (Arg101), which is conserved in many GroEL homologues, is required for interactions between the two heptameric rings. J. Mol. Biol. 282 (1998) 789-800
33. Ivic A., Olden D., Wallington E.J., and Lund P.A. Deletion of Escherichia coli groEL is complemented by a Rhizobium leguminosarum groEL homologue at 37 °C but not at 43 °C. Gene 194 (1997) 1-8
34. Goloubinoff P., Diamant S., Weiss C., and Azem A. GroES binding regulates GroEL chaperonin activity under heat shock. FEBS Lett. 407 (1997) 215-219
35. Llorca O., Galán A., Carrascosa J.L., Muga A., and Valpuesta J.M. GroEL under heat-shock. Switching from a folding to a storing function. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 32587-32594
36. Shewmaker F., Kerner M.J., Hayer-Hartl M., Klein G., Georgopoulos C., and Landry S.J. A mobile loop order-disorder transition modulates the speed of chaperonin cycling. Protein Sci. 13 (2004) 2139-2148
37. DeLano, W.L. (2002) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System on World Wide Web. .