Iterative deconvolution and semiblind deconvolution methods in magnetic archaeological prospecting

Geophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Zunino, Andrea ^a   Benvenuto, Federico ^a,b   Armadillo, Egidio ^a   Bertero, Mario ^a   Bozzo, Emanuele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRADIENT METHODS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMPULSE RESPONSE; MAGNETIC PROSPECTING; MAGNETISM; SOILS; STATISTICAL TESTS; SURFACE MEASUREMENT;

ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTING; IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; ITERATIVE DECONVOLUTION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIZATION DISTRIBUTION; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; REGULARIZATION TECHNIQUE; SEMI-BLIND DECONVOLUTION;

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

ALGORITHM; ARCHAEOLOGY; BURIAL (GEOLOGY); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA SET; DECONVOLUTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MAGNETIC SURVEY; OPTIMIZATION; PALEOMAGNETISM; SUBSOIL;

EID: 67650333619     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3129263     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aykroyd, R. G., J. G. B. Haigh, and G. T. Allum, 2001, Methods applied to survey data from archeological magnetometry: Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 64-76. b3g JSTNAL 0162-1459 10.1198/ 016214501750332983
2. Bertero, M., D. Bindi, P. Boccacci, M. Cattaneo, C. Eva, and V. Lanza, 1998, A novel blind-deconvolution method with an application to seismology: Inverse Problems, 14, 815-833. inp INPEEY 0266-5611 10.1088/ 0266-5611/14/4/004
3. Bertero, M., and P. Boccacci, 1998, Introduction to inverse problems in imaging: IOP Publishing.
4. Bhattacharyya, B. K., 1964, Magnetic anomalies due to prism-shaped bodies with arbitrary polarization: Geophysics, 29, 517-531. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1439386
5. Bhattacharyya, B. K., and M. E. Navolio, 1975, Digital convolution for computing gravity and magnetic anomalies due to arbitrary bodies: Geophysics, 40, 981-992. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1440592
6. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bozzo, E., S. Lombardo, F. Merlanti, and M. Pavan, 1994, Integrated geophysical investigations at an Etrurian settlement in northern Apennines (Italy): Archaeological Prospection, 1, 19-35.
8. Daube-Witherspoon, M. E., and G. Muehllehner, 1986, An iterative image space reconstruction algorithm suitable for volume ECT: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, MI-5, 61-66. itm ITMID4 0278-0062 10.1109/TMI.1986.4307748
9. De Pierro, A. R., 1987, On the convergence of the iterative image space reconstruction algorithm for volume ECT: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, MI-6, 124-125. itm ITMID4 0278-0062
10. Eicke, B., 1992, Iteration methods for convexly constrained ill-posed problems in Hilbert space: Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, 13, 413-429. avq NFAODL 0163-0563 10.1080/01630569208816489
11. Engl, H. W., M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer, 1996, Regularization of inverse problems: Kluwer.
12. Geman, S., and D. McClure, 1987, Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction: Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 52, no. 4, 5-21.
13. Glazunov, V. V., and N. N. Efimova, 2003, Stochastic modeling of magnetic field of heterogeneous archaeological objects: 65th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, F-06.
14. Herwanger, J., H. Maurer, A. Green, and J. Leckebusch, 2000, 3-D inversions of magnetic gradiometer data in archaeological prospecting: Possibilities and limitations: Geophysics, 65, 849-860. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444782
15. Jeng, Y., Y.-L. Lee, C.-Y. Chen, and M.-J. Lin, 2003, Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 53, 31-48. c4u JAGPEA 0926-9851 10.1016/ S0926-9851(03)00015-6
16. Lanteri, H., M. Roche, O. Cuevas, and C. Aime, 2001, A general method to devise maximum-likelihood signal restoration multiplicative algorithms with non-negativity constraints: Signal Processing, 81, 945-974. spq SPRODR 0165-1684 10.1016/S0165-1684(00)00275-9
17. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443968
18. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 2000, Joint inversion of surface and three-component borehole magnetic data: Geophysics, 65, 540-542. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444749
19. Portniaguine, O., and M. Zhdanov, 1999, Focusing geophysical inversion images: Geophysics, 64, 874-887. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444596
20. Tassis, G. A., G. N. Tsokas, R. O. Hansen, C. B. Papazachos, and P. I. Tsourlos, 2008, Two dimensional inverse filtering for the rectification of the magnetic gradiometry signal: Near Surface Geophysics, 6, 113-122.
21. Tsivouraki, B., and G. N. Tsokas, 2007, Wavelet transform in denoising magnetic archaeological prospecting data: Archaeological Prospection, 14, 130-141. 10.1002/arp.289
22. Tsokas, G. N., and C. B. Papazachos, 1992, Two-dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting: Application to the exploration for buried antiquities: Geophysics, 57, 1004-1013. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443311
23. Urquhart, W., and D. W. Strangway, 1985, Interpretation of part of an aeromagnetic survey in the Matagami area of Quebec, in W. J. Hinze, ed., The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps: SEG, 426-438.
24. Vogel, C. R., 1997, Nonsmooth regularization, in H. Engl, A. Louis, and W. Rundell, eds., Inverse problems in geophysical applications: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1-11.
25. 2002, Computational methods for inverse problems: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
26. Wynn, J. C., 1986, Archaeological prospection: An introduction to the special issue: Geophysics, 51, 533-537. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1442107