Two-dimensional inverse filtering for the rectification of the magnetic gradiometry signal

Near Surface Geophysics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 113-122

  Tassis, Giorgos A ^a   Hansen, R O ^b   Tsokas, G N ^a   Papazachos, C B ^a   Tsourlos, P I ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b EDCON PRJ Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE; ARCHAEOLOGY; FILTER; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIZATION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SOFTWARE; TRANSFORMATION;

EID: 41849102004     PISSN: 15694445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2007037     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aspinall A. and Lynam J.T. 1973. An induced polarization instrument for the detection of near surface features. Prospezioni Archaeologiche 5, 67-75.
2. Baranov V. 1957. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo-gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics 22, 359-383.
3. Baranov V. and Naudy H. 1964. Numerical calculation of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole. Geophysics 29, 67-79.
4. Blakeley R.J. 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity & Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press.
5. Cordell L. and McCaffery A.E. 1989. A terracing operator for physical property mapping with potential field data. Geophysics 54, 621-634.
6. Daubechies I. 1990. The wavelet transform, time frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 36, 961-1005.
7. Fedi M. and Quarta T. 1998. Wavelet analysis for the regional - residual separation of potential field anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 46, 507-525.
8. Fleming B.J.W., Yu D., Harrison R.G. and Jubb D. 2000. Analysis of effect of detrending time-scale structure of financial data using discrete wavelet transform. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 3, 375-380.
9. Fluxgate gradiometer FM256. 2003. Instruction Manual Version 1.2. Geoscan Research.
10. Grant F.S. and West G.F. 1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Hansen R.O. and Simmonds M. 1993. Multiple source Werner deconvolution. Geophysics 58, 1972-1800.
12. Hartman R.R., Teksey D.J. and Friedberg J.L. 1971. A system for rapid aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics 36, 891-918.
13. Kanasewich E.R. 1981. Time Sequence Analysis in Geophysics. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton.
14. Karousova O. and Karous M. 1989. Deconvolution of ΔT profile curves. International Symposium on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, University of York and York Archaeological Authorities.
15. Logacev A.A. and Zacharov V.P. 1973. Magnetic Prospecting. Moscow (in Russian).
16. Mallat S. 1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press.
17. McGrath P.H. and Hood P.J. 1973. An automatic least-squares multimodel method for magnetic interpretation. Geophysics 38, 349-358.
18. Papazachos C.B. and Tsokas G.N. 1993. A FORTRAN program for the computation of 2-dimensional inverse filters in magnetic prospecting. Computers & Geosciences 19, 705-715.
19. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. and Flannery B.P. 1986. Numerical Recipes - The Art of Scientific Computing, 1st Ed. Cambridge University Press.
20. Reid A.B., Allsop J.M., Granser H., Millet A.J. and Somerton I.W. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55, 80-91.
21. Roest W.R., Verhoef J. and Pilkington M. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.
22. Scollar I., Weidner B. and Segeth K. 1986. Display of archaeological magnetic data. Geophysics 51, 623-633.
23. Talwani M. 1965. Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape. Geophysics 30, 797-817.
24. Tassis G.A. 2005. MSc. Thesis: Inversion of differential magnetic data in the exploration of archaeological sites. PhD thesis. Applied Geophysical Laboratory, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
25. Tsivouraki-Papafotiou H., Tsokas G.N. and Tsourlos P.I. 2005. Wavelet denoising of magnetic prospecting data. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society 8, 28-36.
26. Tsivouraki-Papafotiou B. and Tsokas G.N. 2005. Wavelet transform in denoising magnetic archaeological prospection data. 6th Conference of Archaeological Prospection, Rome, September 14-17.
27. Tsivouraki-Papafotiou B. and Tsokas U.N. 2007. Wavelet transform in denoising magnetic archaeological prospection data. Archaeological Prospection 14, 130-141.
28. Tsokas G.N. 1993. An investigation of the effectiveness of inverse filtering in the geophysical search of archaeological sites. Theory and Practice of Applied Geophysics 7, 73-88.
29. Tsokas G.N. and Hansen R.O. 1995. A comparison of inverse filtering and multiple source Werner deconcolution for model archaeological problems. Archaeometry 37, 185-193.
30. Tsokas G.N. and Hansen R.O. 2000. On the use of complex attributes and the inferred source parameter estimates in the exploration of archaeological sites. Archaeological Prospection 7, 17-30.
31. Tsokas G.N. and Papazachos C.B. 1990. The applicability of two-dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting for buried antiquities. In: Theory and Practice of Geophysical Data Inversion (eds A. Vogel, A.K.M. Sarwar, R. Gorenfio and O.I. Kounchev), pp. 121-144. Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden.
32. Tsokas G.N. and Papazachos C.B. 1992. Two-dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting: application to the exploration of buried antiquities. Geophysics 57, 1004-1013.
33. Tsokas G.N., Papazachos C.B., Loucoyiannakis M.Z. and Karousova O. 1991. Inversion filters for the transformation of geophysical data from archaeological sites based on the vertical sided finite prism model. Archaeometry 33, 215-230.