Bayesian methods applied to survey data from archeological magnetometry

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 96, Issue 453, 2001, Pages 64-76

  Aykroyd, Robert G ^a   Haigh, John G B ^b   Allum, Gayle T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Archeology; Geophysics; Image reconstruction; Inverse data problems; Metropolis Hasting algorithm; Monte Carlo Markov chain; Normalizing constant

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842816380     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/016214501750332983     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allum, G. T. (1997), “A Statistical Approach to Inverse Data Problems in Archeological Geophysics,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Dept. of Statistics.
2. Allum, G. T., Aykroyd, R. G., and Haigh, J. G. B. (1996), “Restoration of Magnetometry Data Using Inverse-Data Methods,” Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 28, 111–119.
3. Allum, G. T., Aykroyd, R. G., and Haigh, J. G. B. (1998), “Reconstruction of Survey Data from Archeological Magnetometry Using the OSL Algorithm,” Research Report STAT-98/04, University of Leeds, Dept. of Statistics.
4. Aykroyd, R. G. (1998), “Bayesian Estimation for Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Gaussian Random Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analalysis Machine Intelligence, 20, 533–539.
5. Aykroyd, R. G. (1999), “Approximations for Gibbs Distribution Normalizing Constants,” Research Report STAT-99/10, University of Leeds, Dept. of Statistics.
6. Aykroyd, R. G., and Zimeras, S. (1999), “Inhomogeneous Priors for Image Reconstruction,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 934–946.
7. Besag, J. (1986), “On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 48, 259–302.
8. Besag, J. (1989), “Towards Bayesian Image Analysis,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 16, 395–407.
9. Besag, J., Green, P. J., Higdon, D., and Mengersen, K. (1995), “Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems,” Statistical Science, 10, 1–41.
10. Buck, C. E., Cavanagh, W. G., and Litton, C. D. (1990), “Image Segmentation Methods for Archaeological Field Survey Data,” in New Tools for Mathematical Archaeology, Warsaw: Scientific Center for the Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 55–68.
11. Buck, C. E., Cavanagh, W. G., and Litton, C. D. (1996), Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archeological Data, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12. Clark, A. J. (1990), Seeing Beneath the Soil, London: Batsford.
13. Dittmer, J. K., and Szymanski, J. E. (1995), “The Stochastic Inversion of Magnetic and Resistivity Data Using the Simulated Annealing Algorithm,” Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 397–416.
14. Eder-Hinterleitner, A., Neubauer, W., and Melichar, P. (1995), “Reconstruction of Archeological Structures Using Magnetic Prospection,” Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 28, 131–137.
15. Geman, D., and Reynolds, G. (1992), “Constrained Restoration and the Recovery of Discontinuities,” IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14, 367–383.
16. Geman, S., and Geman, D. (1984), “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.
17. Geman, S., and McClure, D. E. (1987), “Statistical Methods for Tomographic Image Reconstruction,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 52, 5–21.
18. Geyer, C. J. (1994), “Estimating Normalizing Constants and Reweighted Mixtures in Markov Chain Monte Carlo,” Technical Report 568, University of Minnesota, School of Statistics.
19. Green, P. J. (1990), “Bayesian Reconstructions From Emission Tomography Data Using a Modified EM Algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 9, 84–93.
20. Higdon, D. M., Bowsher, J. E., Johnson, V. E., Turkington, T. G., Gilland, D. R., and Jaszczak, R. J. (1997), “Fully Bayesian Estimation of Gibbs Hyperparameters for Emission Computed Tomography Data,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16, 516–526.
21. Le Borgne, E. (1955), “Abnormal Magnetic Susceptibility of the Top Soil,” Annales Geophysique, 11, 399–419.
22. Linington, R. E. (1972), “A Summary of Simple Theory Applicable to Magnetic Prospection in Archeology,” Prospezioni Archeologiche, 7, 9–59.
23. Parasnis, D. S. (1986), Principles of Applied Geophysics (4th ed.), New York: Chapman and Hall.
24. Scollar, I. (1970), “Fourier Transformations for the Evaluation of Magnetic Maps,” Prospezioni Archeologiche, 5, 9–41.
25. Weir, I. S. (1997), “Fully Bayesian SPECT Reconstructions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 49–60.