Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-48

  Jeng, Yih ^a   Lee, Yuh Lung ^a   Chen, Chung Yuan ^a   Lin, Ming Juin ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Archaeological; Magnetic; Signal enhancement; Slate casket

Indexed keywords

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC PROSPECTING; MAGNETIZATION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

MAGNETIC METHODS;

GEOPHYSICS;

ALLUVIAL DEPOSIT; ARCHAEOLOGY; BURIED TARGET; MAGNETIC METHOD;

TAIWAN;

EID: 0037384309     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(03)00015-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ackerman, H.A., Dix, C.H., 1955. The first vertical derivative of gravity. Geophysics 20, 148-154.
2. Aitken, M.J., 1974. Physics and Archaeology, 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
3. Atchuta Rao, D., Ram Babu, H.V., Sanker Narayan, P.V., 1981. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: the complex gradient method. Geophysics 46, 1572-1578.
4. Behrendt, J.C., Grim, M.S., 1985. Structure of the U.S. Atlantic continental margin from derivative and filtered maps of the magnetic field. In: Hinze, W. (Ed.), The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp. 325-338.
5. Breiner, S., 1973. Applications manual for portable magnetometers. GeoMetrics.
6. Brizzolari, E., Ermolli, F., Orlando, L., Piro, S., Versino, L., 1994. Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics 29, 47-55.
7. Cammarano, F., Mauriello, P., Piro, S., 1997. High-resolution geophysical prospecting with integrated methods. The Ancient Acropolis of Veio (Rome, Italy). Archaeology Prospection 4, 157-164.
8. Chen, C.-Y., 1994. Chubin, Institute of History and Phonetics, Academia Sinica (in Chinese).
9. Churchill, R.V., Brown, J.W., Verhey, R.F., 1960. Complex Variables and Applications. McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY.
10. Gau, H.-G., Chen, H.-W., Ho, C.-K., 1997. A 3-D ground penetrating radar survey of an archaeological site at the Hutzushan relics. Proc. 1997 Taiwan Symp. on Geophysics (in Chinese).
11. Hinze, W.J. (Ed.), 1985. The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps. Society of Explaration Geophysicist.
12. Ho, C.S., 1997. An Introduction to the Geology of Taiwan. The Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC.
13. Ho, C.-K., Jeng, C.-W., Chen, H.-W., 1997. Investigations of the Frog-sag relic. Report of the National Museum of Natural Sciences.
14. Hsu, S.-K., Sibuet, J.-C., Shyu, C.-T., 1996. High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics 61, 373-386.
15. Jeng, Y., 1995. Shallow seismic investigation of a site with poor reflection quality. Geophysics 60, 1715-1726.
16. Mohan, N.L., 1993. Discussion on "Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal" by W.R. Roest, J. Verhoef and M. Pilkington (Geophysics, 57, 116-125). Geophysics 58, 1214-1216.
17. Mohan, N.L., Anand Babu, L., 1995. An analysis of 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 60, 531-536.
18. Nabighian, M.N., 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37, 507-517.
19. Nabighian, M.N., 1974. Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section. Geophysics 39, 85-92.
20. Nabighian, M.N., 1984. Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: fundamental relation. Geophysics 49, 957-966.
21. Ofoegbu, C.O., Mohan, N.L., 1990. Interpretation of aeromagnetic anomalies over part of southeastern Nigeria using three-dimensional Hilbert transformation. PAGEOPH 134, 13-29.
22. Piro, S., 1996. Integrated geophysical prospecting at Ripa Tetta Neolithic site (Lucera, Foggia-Italy). Archaeological Prospection 3, 81-88.
23. Robinson, E.S., Coruh, C., 1988. Basic Exploration Geophysics. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
24. Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J., Pilkington, M., 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.
25. Stanley, J.M., 1977. Simplified gravity interpretation by gradients-the geological contact. Geophysics 42, 1230-1235.
26. Tabbagh, A., Desvignes, G., Dabas, M., 1997. Processing of Z gradiometer magnetic data using linear transforms and analytical signal. Archaeological Prospection 4, 1-13.
27. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., Sheriff, R.E., 1990. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Tsokas, G.N., Papazachos, C.B., 1992. Two-dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting: application to the exploration for buried antiquities. Geophysics 57, 1004-1013.
29. Tsokas, G.N., Sarris, A., Pappa, M., Bessios, M., Papazachos, C.B., Tsourlos, P., Giannopoulos, A., 1997. A large-scale magnetic survey in Makrygialos (Pieria), Greece. Archaeology Prospection 4, 123-137.
30. Wynn, J.C., 1986. Archaeological prospection: an introduction to the special issue. Geophysics 51, 533-537.