The effectiveness of CME - quality improvement through differentiated advanced medical education research;Die Effektivitat von CME Qualitatsentwicklung durch differenzierte Lehr-/Lernforschune

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 165-168

  Rotthoff, Thomas ^a   Baehring, Thomas ^a   David, Dagmar M ^b   Scherbaum, Werner A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^b Arztekammer Nordrhein   (Germany)

Author keywords

CME; Continuing medical education; Continuing professional development; CPD; Educational research; Outcome assessment; Professional education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RESEARCH; STANDARD; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; GERMANY; HUMANS; LEARNING; RESEARCH; TEACHING;

EID: 67650328147     PISSN: 18659217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. [1 ] http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/ page.asp?his=0.2.20.1828.2054. 2143.2144 &all=true (Zugriff am 27.01.09).
2. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/ upload/mm/455/pra2006.pdf (Zugriff am 27.01.09).
3. http://www.accme.org/dir-docs/doc- upload/7ac66e27-3ed0-4b83-854d- ce5a8ed82099-uploaddocument.pdf (Zugriff am 27.01.09).
4. Schäfer R. Über die Wirksamkeit von Fort- bildung. Medizinische Klinik 2008;103:13.
5. Rotthoff T, Fahron U, Baehring T, Scher- baum WA. Die Qualität von CME-Fragen in der Ärztlichen Fortbildung. Eine empirische Studie. ZaeFQ 2008;101:667-78.
6. Schäfer S, Schäfer C, Lösche P, Christ H, Lehmacher W, Griebenow R. Determinan- ten für die Bearbeitungszeit von zertifizierter Fortbildung in Print Medien. Med Klin 2008;103(4):230-9.
7. Kühne-Eversmann L, Nussbaum C, Reincke M, Fischer MR. CME-Fortbildungsangebote in medizinischen Fachzeitschriften: Struk- turqualität der MC-Fragen als Erfolgskon- trollen. Med Klin 2007; 102(12):993-1001.
8. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratana- wongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education. Evidence Report/ Technology Assessment No. 149 (Prepared by the John Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02- 0018). AHRQ Publication no. 07-E006. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January 2007.
9. Davis D, Thomson O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf F, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of Formal Continuing Medical Education. Do Conferences, Workshops, Rounds, and Other Traditional Continuing Education Activities Change Physician Behaviour or Health Care Outcomes? JAMA 1999;282:867-74.
10. Lane DS, Messina CR, Grimson R. An educational approach to improving physician breast cancer screening practices and counseling skills. Patient Educ Couns 2001;43(3):287-99.
11. White CW, Albanese MA, Brown DD, Ca- plan RM. The effectiveness of continuing medical education in changing the behaviour of physicians caring for patients with acute myocardial infarction. A controlled randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1985;102(5):686-92.
12. Gerstein HC, Reddy SS, Dawson KG, Yale JF, Shannon S, Norman G. A controlled evaluation of a national continuing medical education programme designed to improve familiy physicians' implementation of diabetes specific clinical practice guidelines. Diabet Med 1999;16(11):964-9.
13. Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians' interviewing skills and reducing patients' emotional distress. A randomized clinicial trial. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155(17): 1877-84.
14. Rodney WM, Albers G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy: primary care outcomes after two types of continuing medical education. Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81(2):133-7.
15. Grant J. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ 2002;324:156-9.
16. Norman GR, Shannon SI, Marrin ML. The need for needs assessment in continuing medical education. BMJ 2004;328: 999-1001.
17. Sibley JC, Sackett DL, Neufeld V, Gerrard B, Rudnick KV, Fraser W. A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med 1982;306:511-5.
18. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of Physician Self-assessment Compared with Observed Measures of Competence. JAMA 2006;296:1094-102.
19. Spivey BE. Continuing Medical Education in the United States: Why it needs reform and how we propose to accomplish it. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005;25(3): 134-43.
20. Fox RD, Bennet NL. Learning and change: implications for continuing medical education. BMJ 1998;316:466-9.
21. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, llling J, et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008;30(2): 124-45.
22. Wissenschaftsrat. Empfehlungen zur Qua- litatsverbesserung von Lehre und Studium (Drs. 8639-08), Juli 2008; http://www. wissenschaftsrat.de/texte/8639- 08.pdf (ugriff am 27.01.09).
23. Hinweise zum Anerkennungsverfahren von Fortbildungsveranstaltungen bei der Ärzte- kammer Nordrhein. http://www.aekno. de/htmljava/frameset.asp? typ=j&seite=suche. asp(Zugriff am 27.01.09).
24. Guidance on Continuing Professional Development, General Medical Council 2004; http://www.gmc-uk.org Zugriff am 27.01.09).
25. Toolbox of Assessment Methods; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome project http://www.acgme. org/Outcome/assess/Toolbox.pdf (Zugriff am 27.01.09).