Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems

Computers and Education

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 890-899

  He, Yulan ^a   Hui, Siu Cheung ^b   Quan, Tho Thanh ^c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Adaptive feedback; Intelligent tutoring systems; Latent semantic analysis; N gram co occurrence; Summary writing assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; N-GRAM CO-OCCURRENCE; SUMMARY WRITING ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; SEMANTICS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 67650232982     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arroyo, I., Beck, J., Woolf, B., Beal, C., & Schultz, K. (2000). Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems, LNCS (Vol. 1839, pp. 574-583).
2. Bransford J., Brown A., and Cocking R. How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience and school (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Chang K., Chen I., and Sung Y. The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education 71 1 (2002) 5-23
4. Chi M., Siler S., Jeong H., Yamaguchi T., and Hausmann R. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 25 (2001) 471-533
5. Clark, R. (2004). Design document for a guided experiential learning course. Final report on contract DAAD 19-99-D-0046-0004 from TRADOC to the Institute for Creative Technologies and the Rossier School of Education.
6. Domingos P. Bayesian averaging of classifiers and the overfitting problem. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (2000), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA 223-230
7. Franzke, M., & Streeter, L. (2006). Building student summarization, writing and reading comprehension skills with guided practice and automated feedback. Highlights From Research at the University of Colorado, A white paper from Pearson Knowledge Technologies.
8. Hartman H. Human learning and instruction (2002), City College of City University of New York, New York Scaffolding and cooperative learning (pp. 23-69)
9. Kirschner P., Sweller J., and Clark R. Why minimally guided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist 41 2 (2006) 75-86
10. Landauer T., Foltz P., and Laham D. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25 (1998) 259-284
11. Landauer, T., Laham, D., Rehder, B., & Schreiner, M. E. (1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans. In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the cognitive science society.
12. Lane, H. (2006). Intelligent tutoring systems: Prospects for guided practice and efficient learning. In Army's science of learning workshop. Hampton, VA.
13. Lee J. O-level English (2005), Singapore Asian Publications (S) Pte Ltd.
14. Lin, C.-Y. (2004). ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proceedings of the workshop on text summarization branches out (WAS 2004). Barcelona, Spain.
15. Lin, C.-Y., & Hovy, E. (2003). Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology (pp. 71-78).
16. Miller G.A., Fellbaum C., Tengi R., Wakefield P., Poddar R., Langone H., et al. WordNet: a lexical database for the English language (2006), Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory
17. Olson J., and Platt J. Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (2000), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ The instructional cycle (pp. 170-197)
18. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Jing Zhu, W. (2002). BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 311-318).
19. Pérez, D., Alfonseca, E., & Rodríguez, P. (2004). Upper bounds of the bleu algorithm applied to assessing student essays. In: Proceedings of the 30th international association for educational assessment (IAEA) conference.
20. Perez, D., Gliozzo, A., Strapparava, C., Alfonseca, E., Rodriguez, P., & Magnini, B. (2005). Automatic assessment of students' free-text answers underpinned by the combination of a bleu-inspired algorithm and latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th international FLAIRS conference. Clearwater Beach, FL.
21. Rajamanikum K. English language (Yearly) worked solutions (2000), Redspot Publishing Singapore
22. Shute V., Hansen E., and Almond R. Evaluating ACED: The impact of feedback and adaptivity on learning. In: Luckin K. (Ed). Artificial intelligence in education (2007), IOS Press 230-237
23. Timms M. Using item response theory (IRT) to select hints in an ITS. In: Luckin K. (Ed). Artificial intelligence in education (2007), IOS Press 213-221
24. Vygotsky L. Thought and language (1962), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Wheway, V. (2001). Using boosting to simplify classification models. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on data mining (pp. 558-565). Washington, DC, USA.
26. Zipitria, I., Elorriaga, J., Arruate, A., & de IIarraza, A. (2004). From human to automatic summary evaluation. In Seventh international conference on intelligent tutoring system.