Evaluating ACED: The Impact of Feedback and Adaptivity on Learning

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 158, Issue , 2007, Pages 230-237

  Shute, Valerie J ^a   Hansen, Eric G ^a   Almond, Russell G ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment for learning; Bayesian networks; evidence centered design

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE CONTENT; ADAPTIVITY; ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING; BAYESIA N NETWORKS; DESIGN APPROACHES; DESIGN ELEMENTS; EVIDENCE-BASED; EVIDENCE-CENTERED DESIGN; FORMATIVE FEEDBACKS; GEOMETRIC SEQUENCE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 67650240580     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
3. Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. ETS Research Report, Princeton, NJ.
4. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment FOR Learning, Phi Delta Kappan Professional Journal, 83(10), 758-765.
5. Jameson, A. (2006). Adaptive interfaces and agents. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Human-computer interaction handbook (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227-265.
7. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111-127.
8. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
9. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113.
10. Lepper, M. R. & Chabay, R. W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 217-230.
11. Narciss, S. & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner & R. Brunken (Ed.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Munster, New York: Waxmann.
12. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of Feedback Control in Computer-based Tutoring: Impact on Learning Rate, Achievement and Attitudes. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, ACM Press: 245-252.
13. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
14. Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln: 14. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
15. Shute, V. J. & Zapata-Rivera, D. (in press). Adaptive technologies. In J. M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd Edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
16. Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (in press). An assessment for learning system called ACED: Designing for learning effectiveness and accessibility, ETS Research Report, Princeton, NJ.
17. Good, I. J., & Card, W. (1971). The diagnostic process with special reference to errors. Method of Inferential Medicine, 10, 176–188.
18. Madigan, D., & Almond, R. G. (1996). On test selection strategies for belief networks. In D. Fisher & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Learning from data: AI and statistics IV (pp. 89–98). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Good, I. J. (1985): Weight of evidence: A brief survey. In J. Bernardo, M. DeGroot, D. Lindley, & A. Smith (Eds.) Bayesian Statistics 2 (pp. 249-269), Amsterdam: North Holland.
20. Conejo, R., Guzman, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Perez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Rios, A. (2004). SIETTE: A web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14(1), 29-61.
21. nd Edition), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
22. Shute, V. J., Graf, E. A., & Hansen, E. G. (2006). Designing adaptive, diagnostic math assessments for individuals with and without visual disabilities. ETS Research Report, RR-06-01, Princeton, NJ.