The independence of size perception and distance perception

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 1140-1152

  Haber, Ralph Norman ^a,b,d   Levin, Charles A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BALDWIN WALLACE COLLEGE   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035489528     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194530     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BOLLES, R. C., & BAILEY, C. (1956). Importance of object recognition in size constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 222-225.
2. BRUNSWIK, E. (1956). Systematic and representative design in experimental psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. CUTTING, J. E. (1998). Information from the world around us. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 71-97). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. CUTTING, J. E., & VISHTON, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextural use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 71-118). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. EPSTEIN, W. (1961). The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 333-346.
6. EPSTEIN, W. (1977). Stability and constancy in visual perception. New York: Wiley.
7. GILLAM, B. J. (1995). The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 23-70). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. GILLAM, B. J. (1998). Illusions at century's end. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 97-137). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. HABER, R. N. (1983). Stimulus information and processing mechanisms in visual space perception. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 157-235). New York: Academic Press.
10. HABER, R. N. (1986). Toward a theory of the perceived layout of scenes. In A. Rosenfeld (Ed.), Human and machine vision II (pp. 109-148). New York: Academic Press.
11. HABER, R. N., & HABER, L. (1991). Why mobile robots need a spatial memory. In P. S. Schenker (Ed.), Sensor fusion III: 3D perception and recognition (Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 1383, pp. 411-424). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.
12. HABER, R. N., & LEVIN, C. A. (1989). The lunacy of moon watching: Some preconditions on explanations of the moon illusion. In M. Hershenson (Ed.), The moon illusion (pp. 299-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. HERSHENSON, M. (1992). Size-distance invariance: Kinetic invariance is different from static invariance. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 541-548.
14. HERSHENSON, M. (1999). Visual space perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. HOCHBERG, J. E. (1971). Perception: II. Space and movement. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
16. ITTLESON, W. H. (1960). Visual space perception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. KILPATRICK, F. P., & ITTELSON, W. H. (1953). The size-distance invariance hypothesis. Psychological Review, 64, 188-192.
18. LEVIN, C. A., & HABER, R. N. (1993). Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 250-259.
19. SEDGWICK, H. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 1-57). New York: Wiley.
20. TOYE, R. C. (1986). The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 85-92.