Genetic basis for osmosensitivity and genetic instability of the wine yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae VIN7

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-154

  Erasmus, Daniel J ^a   Van Vuuren, Hennie J J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Osmotic stress; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Volatile acidity; Wine

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITACEAE;

EID: 67650083100     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. Lews, M. Raf, K. Roberts, and J. D. Watson. 1994. Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing, New York.
2. Albertyn, J., S. Hohmann, J. M. Thevelein, and B. A. Prior. 1994. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4135-4144.
3. Aranda, A., M. Del Olmo. 2003. Response to acet al.dehyde stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a strain-dependent regulation of several ALD genes and is mediated by the general stress response pathway. Yeast 20:747-759.
4. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1995. Short Protocols in Molecular Biology. 3d ed. Wiley & Sons, New York.
5. +) in acquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 171:1087-1092.
6. Bro, C., B. Regenberg, G. Lagniel, J. Labarre, M. Montero-Lomeli, and J. Nielsen. 2003. Transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic responses to lithium in galactose-grown yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278:31141-32149.
7. Bruinenberg, P. M., J. P. van Dijken, and W. A. Scheffers. 1983. A theoretical analysis of NADPH production and consumption in yeasts. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129:953-964.
8. Erasmus, D. J., M. Cliff, and H. J. J. van Vuuren. 2004. Impact of yeast strain on the production of acetic acid, glycerol, and the sensory attributes of icewine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:371-378.
9. Erasmus, D. J., G. K. van der Merwe, and H. J. J. van Vuuren. 2003. Genome-wide expression analysis: Metabolic adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res. 3:375-399.
10. Garcia Moruno, E., C. Delfini, E. Pessione, and C. Giunta. 1993. Factors affecting acetic acid production by yeasts in strongly clarified grape musts. Microbios 74:249-256.
11. Gasch, A. P., P. T. Spellman, C. M. Kao, O. Carmel-Harel, M. B. Eisen, G. Storz, D. Botstein, and P. O. Brown. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:4241-4257.
12. Giaever, G., et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
13. 2 zinc finger protein Msn2p is regulated by stress and protein kinase A activity. Genes Dev. 12:586-597.
14. Grabowska, D., and A. Chelstowska. 2003. The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 278:13984-13988.
15. Griffith, J. L., L. E. Coleman, A. S. Raymond, S. G. Goodson, W. S. Pittard, C. Tsui, S. E. Devine. 2003. Functional genomics reveals relationships between the retrovirus-like Ty1 element and its host Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 164:867-879.
16. Heitman, J, N. R. Movva, and M. N. Hall. 1991. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 253:905-909.
17. Heux, S., A. Cadiere, and S. Dequin. 2008. Glucose utilization of strains lacking PGI1 and expressing a transhydrogenase suggests differences in the pentose phosphate capacity among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:217-224.
18. Hohmann, S. 2002. Osmotic stress signalling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:300-372.
19. Lambrechts, M. G., and I. S. Pretorius. 2000. Yeast and its importance to wine aroma-A review. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 21:97-129.
20. Margalit, Y. 1997. Concepts in Wine Chemistry. Wine Appreciation Guild, San Francisco.
21. Marks, V. D., S. J. Ho Sui, D. Erasmus, G. K. van der Merwe, J. Brumm, W. W. Wasserman, J. Bryan, and H. J. J. van Vuuren. 2008. Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:35-52.
22. Martinez-Pastor, M. T., G. Marchle, C. Schuller, A. Marchler-Bauer, H. Ruis, and F. Estruch. 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J. 15:2227-2235.
23. 2+-activated acet al.dehyde dehydrogenase. Yeast 13:1319-1327.
24. Navarro-Avino, J. P., R. Prasad, V. J. Miralles, R. M. Benito, and R. Serrano. 1999. A proposal for nomenclature of aldehyde dehydrogenases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization of the stress-inducible ALD2 and ALD3 genes. Yeast 15:829-842.
25. Norbeck, J., A. K. Pahlman, N. Akhtar, A. Blomberg, and L. Adler. 1996. Purification and characterization of two isoenzymes of dl -glycerol-3- phosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Identification of the corresponding GPP1 and GPP2 genes and evidence for osmotic regulation of Gpp2p expression by the osmosensing mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 271:13875-13881.
26. Powers, T., and P. Walter. 1999. Regulation of ribosome biogenesis by the rapamycin-sensitive TOR-signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:987-1000.
27. + acet al.dehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3151-3159.
28. Remize, F., B. Cambon, L. Barnavon, and S. Dequin. 2003. Glycerol formation during wine fermentation is mainly linked to Gpd1p and is only partially controlled by the HOG pathway. Yeast 20:1243-1253.
29. Remize, F., J. L. Roustan, J. M. Sablayrolles, P. Barre, and S. Dequin. 1999. Glycerol overproduction by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains leads to substantial changes in byproduct formation and to a stimulation of fermentation rate in stationary phase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:143-149.
30. Rep, M., J. Albertyn, J. M. Thevelein, B. A. Prior, and S. Hohmann. 1999. Different signalling pathways contribute to the control of GPD1 expression by osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 145:715-727.
31. Rep, M., M. Krantz, J. M. Thevelein, and S. Hohmann. 2000. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J. Biol. Chem. 275:8290-300.
32. Schmelzle, T., and M. N. Hall. 2000. TOR, a central controller of cell growth. Cell 103:253-262.
33. Schuller, C., J. L. Brewster, M. R. Alexander, M. C. Gustin, and H. Ruis. 1994. The HOG pathway controls osmotic regulation of transcription via the stress response element (STRE) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTT1 gene. EMBO J. 13:4382-4389.
34. Verduyn, C., E. Postma, A. Scheffers, and J. P. van Dijken. 1990. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucoselimited chemostat cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:395-403.
35. Wang, X. P., C. J. Mann, Y. L. Bai, L. Ni, and H. Weiner. 1998. Molecular cloning, characterization, and potential roles of cytosolic and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases in ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 180:822-830.
36. Yale, J., and H. J. Bohnert. 2001. Transcript expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high salinity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:15996-16007.