Can arterial spin labeling detect white matter perfusion signal?

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 165-173

  Van Osch, Matthias J P ^a   Teeuwisse, Wouter M ^a   Van Walderveen, Marianne A A ^a   Hendrikse, Jeroen ^b   Kies, Dennis A ^a   Van Buchem, Mark A ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial spin labeling; Cerebral blood flow; Perfusion MRI; White matter

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; BACKGROUND SUPPRESSION; CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST MRIS; PERFUSION MRI; RELIABLE DETECTION; WHITE MATTER;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

ADULT; ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 67650067605     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Powers WJ, Press GA, Grubb RL Jr. The effect of hemodynamically significant carotid artery disease on the hemodynamic status of the cerebral circulation. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:27-35.
2. Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Schwamm LH, Lev MH, Huang Hellinger FR, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM, Davis TL, Suwanwela N, Can U, Moreira JA, Copen WA, Look RB, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Koroshetz WJ. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1996;199:391-401.
3. Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:726-736.
4. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
5. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212-216 [erratum Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:4220].
6. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:10-27.
7. Wong EC, Cronin M, Wu WC, Inglis B, Frank LR, Liu TT. Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1334-1341.
8. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, Dupont A, Damholt MB, Heaf JG, Thomsen HS. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2359-2362.
9. van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Pitfalls of MRI measurement of white matter perfusion based on arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:788-795.
10. Ye FQ, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST). Magn Reson Med 2000;44:92-100.
11. Garcia DM, Bazelaire CM, Alsop DC. Pseudo-continuous flow driven adiabatic inversion for arterial spin labeling. In: Proc 13th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Miami Beach; 2005:37.
12. Wu WC, Fernandez-Seara M, Detre JA, Wehrli FW, Wang J. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1020-1027.
13. Fernandez-Seara MA, Edlow BL, Hoang A, Wang J, Feinberg DA, Detre JA. Minimizing acquisition time of arterial spin labeling at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:1467-1471.
14. Liu G, Sobering G, Duyn J, Moonen CTW. A functional MRI technique combining principles of echo-shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO). Magn Reson Med 1993;30:764-768.
15. Manka C, Traber F, Gieseke J, Schild HH, Kuhl CK. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose. Radiology 2005;234:869-877.
16. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000;31:680-687.
17. Golay X, Petersen ET, Hui F. Pulsed star labeling of arterial regions (PULSAR): a robust regional perfusion technique for high field imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:15-21.
18. St Lawrence KS, Wang J. Effects of the apparent transverse relaxation time on cerebral blood flow measurements obtained by arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:425-433.
19. Lehr R. Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates. Stat Med 1992;11:1099-1102.
20. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
21. Vonken EJ, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:109-117.
22. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, Duyn J, Smith AM, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:450-456.
23. Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Healy MJR, Gibbs JM, Wise RJS, Hatazawa J, Herold S, Beaney RP, Brooks DJ, Spinks T, Rhodes C, Frackowiak SJ, Jones T. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization, normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990;113:27-47.
24. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral bloodflow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637-641.
25. Garcia DM, Duhamel G, Alsop DC. Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:366-372.
26. Mahalick DM, Ruff RM, Heary RF, HS U. Preoperative versus postoperative neuropsychological sequelae of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1993;33:563-570.
27. Biagi L, Abbruzzese A, Bianchi MC, Alsop DC, Del Guerra A, Tosetti M. Age dependence of cerebral perfusion assessed by magnetic resonance continuous arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:696-702.
28. Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, Borbely K, Dillon WP, Eastwood JD, Glenn TC, Grandin CB, Pedraza S, Soustiel JF, Nariai T, Zaharchuk G, Caille JM, Dousset V, Yonas H. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005;36:e83-e99.
29. Donahue MJ, Lu H, Jones CK, Pekar JJ, Van Zijl PC. An account of the discrepancy between MRI and PET cerebral blood flow measures. A high-field MRI investigation. NMR Biomed 2006;19:1043-1054.
30. Meltzer CC, Leal JP, Mayberg HS, Wagner HN Jr, Frost JJ. Correction of PET data for partial volume effects in human cerebral cortex by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:561-570.
31. Gunther M, Oshio K, Feinberg DA. Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:491-498.
32. Hendrikse J, van Osch MJ, Rutgers DR, Bakker CJ, Kappelle LJ, Golay X, Van Der GJ. Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times. Radiology 2004;233:899-904.
33. Gunther M, Bock M, Schad LR. Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn Reson Med 2001;46:974-984.