An account of the discrepancy between MRI and PET cerebral blood flow measures. A high-field MRI investigation

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1043-1054

  Donahue, Manus J ^a,b,c   Lu, Hanzhang ^a,b,d   Jones, Craig K ^a,b   Pekar, James J ^a,b   van Zijl, Peter C M ^a,b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial spin labeling; Cerebral blood flow; Partial volume; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TISSUE;

CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; POST-LABELING DELAYS; PULSED ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING;

BLOOD;

ADULT; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SCINTISCANNING; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; COMPARTMENT MODEL; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPIN LABELING; WHITE MATTER;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845256771     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1075     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992; 89: 212-216.
2. Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995; 34: 293-301.
3. Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 40: 383-396.
4. Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999; 19; 701-735.
5. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Neuroimag. Clin. N. Am. 1999; 9: 333-342.
6. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn. Reson. Imag. 2004; 15: 10-27.
7. Raichle ME, Martin WR, Herscovitch P, Mintun MA, Markham J. Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation. J. Nucl. Med. 1983; 24: 790-798.
8. Maeda T, Matsuda H, Hisada K, Tonami N, Mori H, Fujii H, Hayashi M, Yamamoto S. Three-dimensional regional cerebral blood perfusion images with single-photon emission computed tomography. Radiology 1981; 140: 817-822.
9. Baron JC, Bousser MG, Comar D, Soussaline F, Castaigne P. Noninvasive tomographic study of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in vivo. Potentials, limitations, and clinical applications in cerebral ischemic disorders. Eur. Neurol. 1981; 20: 273-284.
10. Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Healy MJ, Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Hatazawa J, Herold S, et al. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990; 113(1): 27-47.
11. Iida H, Miura S, Shoji Y, Ogawa T, Kado H, Narita Y, Hatazawa J, Eberl S, Kanno I, Uemura K. Noninvasive quantitation of cerebral blood flow using oxygen-15-water and a dual-PET system. J. Nucl. Med. 1998; 39: 1789-1798.
12. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, Listerud J, Gonzalez-At JB, Schnall MD, Detre JA. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48: 242-254.
13. Hendrikse J, van Osch MJ, Rutgers DR, Bakker CJ, Kappelle LJ, Golay X, van der Grond J. Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times. Radiology 2004; 233: 899-904.
14. Rostrup E, Law I, Blinkenberg M, Larsson HB, Born AP, Holm S, Paulson OB. Regional differences in the CBF and BOLD responses to hypercapnia: a combined PET and fMRI study. Neuroimage 2000; 11: 87-97.
15. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, Duyn J, Smith AM, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 450-456.
16. Feng CM, Narayana S, Lancaster JL, Jerabek PA, Arnow TL, Zhu F, Tan LH, Fox PT, Gao JH. CBF changes during brain activation: fMRI vs. PET. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 443-446.
17. Kety SS, Schmidt CF. The determination of cerebral blood flow in man by use of nitrous oxide in low concentrations. Am. J. Physiol. 1945; 143: 53-66.
18. Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain-blood partition coefficient for water? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1985; 5: 65-69.
19. Phillips WT, Lemen L, Goins B, Rudolph AS, Klipper R, Fresne D, Jerabek PA, Emch ME, Martin C, Fox PT, McMahan CA. Use of oxygen-15 to measure oxygen-carrying capacity of blood substitutes in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. 1997; 272: H2492-2499.
20. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl PC. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 679-682.
21. Zhou J, van Zijl PC. Effect of transit times on quantification of cerebral blood flow by the FAIR T(1)-difference approach. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 42: 890-894.
22. Silva AC, Zhang W, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Estimation of water extraction fractions in rat brain using magnetic resonance measurement of perfusion with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 37: 58-68.
23. St Lawrence KS, Frank JA, McLaughlin AC. Effect of restricted water exchange on cerebral blood flow values calculated with arterial spin tagging: a theoretical investigation. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 440-449.
24. Zhou J, Wilson DA, Ulatowski JA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Two-compartment exchange model for perfusion quantification using arterial spin tagging. J Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2001; 21: 440-455.
25. Parkes LM, Tofts PS. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48: 27-41.
26. Golay X, Stuber M, Pruessmann KP, Meier D, Boesiger P. Transfer insensitive labeling technique (TILT): application to multislice functional perfusion imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 1999; 9: 454-461.
27. Chen Q, Siewert B, Bly BM, Warach S, Edelman RR. STAR-HASTE: perfusion imaging without magnetic susceptibility artifact. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 38: 404-408.
28. Born AP, Rostrup E, Miranda MJ, Larsson HB, Lou HC. Visual cortex reactivity in sedated children examined with perfusion MRI (FAIR). Magn. Reson. Imag. 2002; 20: 199-205.
29. Hiroki M, Uema T, Kajimura N, Ogawa K, Nishikawa M, Kato M, Watanabe T, Nakajima T, Takano H, Imabayashi E, Ohnishi T, Takayama Y, Matsuda H, Uchiyama M, Okawa M, Takahashi K, Fukuyama H. Cerebral white matter blood flow is constant during human non-rapid eye movement sleep: a positron emission tomographic study. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005; 98: 1846-1854.
30. Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput. Assist. Tomogr 1998; 22: 139-152.
31. Lu H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, Golay X, Lin D, Pomper M, van Zijl PC. Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2005; 22: 13-22.
32. Herscovitch P, Raichle ME, Kilbourn MR, Welch MJ. Positron emission tomographic measurement of cerebral blood flow and permeability-surface area product of water using [15O]water and [11C]butanol. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1987; 7: 527-542.
33. Steinmetz H, Huang Y, Seitz RJ, Knorr U, Schlaug G, Herzog H, Hacklander T, Freund HJ. Individual integration of positron emission tomography and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992; 12: 919-926.
34. Gunther M, Bock M, Schad LR. Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn. Reson. Med. 2001; 46: 974-984.
35. Hendrikse J, Lu H, van der Grond J, Van Zijl PC, Golay X. Measurements of cerebral perfusion and arterial hemodynamics during visual stimulation using TURBO-TILT. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003; 50: 429-433.
36. Yang Y, Frank JA, Hou L, Ye FQ, McLaughlin AC, Duyn JH. Multislice imaging of quantitative cerebral perfusion with pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 825-832.
37. Schepers J, Van Osch MJ, Nicolay K. Effect of vascular crushing on FAIR perfusion kinetics, using a BIR-4 pulse in a magnetization prepared FLASH sequence. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003; 50: 608-613.
38. Mazziotta JC, Phelps ME, Plummer D, Kuhl DE. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 5. Physical-anatomical effects. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1981; 5: 734-743.
39. Koeppe RA, Hutchins GD, Rothley JM, Hichwa RD. Examination of assumptions for local cerebral blood flow studies in PET. J. Nucl. Med. 1987; 28: 1695-1703.
40. Ohta S, Meyer E, Fujita H, Reutens DC, Evans A, Gjedde A. Cerebral [15O]water clearance in humans determined by PET: I. Theory and normal values. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 765-780.
41. Iida H, Law I, Pakkenberg B, Krarup-Hansen A, Eberl S, Holm S, Hansen AK, Gundersen HJ, Thomsen C, Svarer C, Ring P, Friberg L, Paulson OB. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow corrected for partial volume effect using O-15 water and PET: I. Theory, error analysis, and stereologic comparison. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 1237-1251.
42. McLaughlin AC, Ye FQ, Pekar JJ, Santha AK, Frank JA. Effect of magnetization transfer on the measurement of cerebral blood flow using steady-state arterial spin tagging approaches: a theoretical investigation. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 37: 501-510.