Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 161-165

  Lia Mondelli, Rafael Francisco ^a   Ishikiriama, Sérgio Kiyoshi ^a   De Oliveira Filho, Otávio ^b   Mondelli, José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UBERABA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Compressive strength; Nonvital tooth

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649949077     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Araujo P A, Chiodi J Netto. Alterações na estrutura de amálgama dental, provocadas durante a inclusão de corpos de prova para metalografia. Estomat & Cult. 1968;2:7-12.
2. Ausiello P, De Gee A, Rengo S, Davidson C. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;10:237-41.
3. Braly B, Maxwell E. Potential for tooth fracture in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:411-4.
4. Burke F. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J Dent. 1992;20:131-9.
5. Cavel W, Kelsey W, Blankenau R. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:38-42.
6. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18:256-65.
7. Eakle W. Increased fracture resistance of teeth: comparison of five bonded composite resin systems. Quintessence Int. 1986;17:17-20.
8. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Barink M, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cuspreplacing composite restorations? Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:443-8.
9. Gelb M, Barouch E, Simonsen R. Resistance to cusp fracture in class II prepared and restored premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:184-5.
10. Geursten W, Schwarze T, Günay H. Diagnosis, therapy, and prevention of the cracked tooth syndrome. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:409-17.
11. Goerig A, Mueninghoff L. Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I: Concept for restorative designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:340- 5.
12. Hansen E. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mater. 1988;4:169-73.
13. Hood J, Stokes A, Chang A, Pradji A. The effect of three adhesive restorative systems on impact fracture of premolar teeth. Int J Perio Rest Dent. 1987;3:109-11.
14. Ingraham R. The application of sound biomechanical principles in design of inlay, amalgam and gold foil restorations. J Am Dent. 1950;40:402-13.
15. Lagouvardos P, Sourai P, Douvitsas G. Coronal fractures in posterior teeth. Oper Dent. 1989;14:28-32.
16. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Gontar G, Hirsh A. The effect of posterior composite restorations on the resistance of cavity walls to vertically applied occlusal. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17:99-105.
17. Lin CL, Chang YH, Liu PR. Multi-factorial analysis of a cuspreplacing adhesive premolar restoration: A finite element study. J Dent. 2008;36:194-203.
18. Medige J, Deng Y, Yu X, Davis E, Joynt R. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:571-6.
19. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro MFL, Soares F. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:419-22.
20. Mondelli RFL, Barbosa W, Mondelli J, Franco E, Carvalho R. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage. Am J Dent. 1998;11:181-4.
21. Morin D, DeLong R, Douglas W. Cusp reinforcement by the acidetch technique. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1075-8.
22. Navarro MFL, Franco EB, Ishikiriama A. Resistência à fratura de dentes extraídos, íntegros e cariados, com preparos e restaurações. Estomat & Cult 1983;13:56-60.
23. Oliveira F, Denehy G, Boyer D. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;115:57-60.
24. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999;20:544-53.
25. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:225-32.
26. Sedgley C, Messer H. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod. 1992;18:332-5.
27. Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2005;13:57-64. 28
28. Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki B, Oskoui SS, Kahnamoui MA. The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars. Oper Dent. 2007;32:285-90.
29. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:30-7.
30. Stappert CF, Abe P, Kurths V, Gerds T, Strub JR. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:41-8.
31. Wang L, Garcia FC, Araújo PA, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. J Esthet Rest Dent. 2004;16:303-14.
32. Wendt SJ. Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Am J Dent. 1991;4:10-4.