Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 303-314

  Wang, Linda ^a   Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ^b   De Araújo, Paulo Amarante ^b   Franco, Eduardo Batista ^b   Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NORTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c University of São Paulo ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; LABORATORY TEST; MACHINE; RECORDING; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; WEIGHT; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

EID: 10444257947     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00058.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20:S60-S66.
2. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Shaddy RS, Stanislay CM. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials. Oper Dem 2000; 26:331-335.
3. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM, Blake SM. Wear assessment of high viscosity and conventional composite restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001; 26:152-156.
4. Yap AUJ, Teoh SH, Tan KB. Three-body abrasive wear of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2001; 26:145-151.
5. Ruddell DE, Maloney MM, Thompson JY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18:72-80.
6. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs: ADA Council on Dental Benefit Programs. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:1627-1628.
7. Leinfelder KF, Nash RW, Radz GM. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19:230-237.
8. Leinfelder KF, Baye SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:234-249.
9. Brackett WW, Covey DA. Resistance to condensation of condensable resin composites as evaluated by mechanical test. Oper Dent 2000; 25:424-426.
10. Hilton TJ, Swift Jr EJ. Packable composites. J Esthet Rest Dent 2001; 13:216-226.
11. Yap AUJ, Chew CL, Teoh SH, Ong LFKL. Influence of contact stress on OCA wear of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2001; 26:134-144.
12. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003; 19:12-18.
13. Miller WD. Experiments and observations on the wasting of tooth tissue variously designated as erosion, abrasion, chemical abrasion, denudation, etc. Dent Cosmos 1907; 49:1-23.
14. Harte DB, Manly RS. Effect of toothbrush variables on wear of dentin produced by four abrasives. J Dent Res 1975; 54:993-998.
15. Bishop K, Kelleher M, Briggs P, Joshi R. Wear now? An update on the etiology of tooth wear. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 305-312.
16. Lugassy AA, Greener EH. An abrasion resistance study of some dental resins. J Dent Res 1972; 51:967-989.
17. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. Abrasion of restorative materials by toothpaste. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3:121-138.
18. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 218-226.
19. Gil FJ, Espias A, Sánchez LA, Planell JA. Comparison of the abrasive wear resistance between amalgams, hybrid composite material and different dental cements. Int Dent J 1999; 49:337-342.
20. Turssi CP, de Magalhàes CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations. Oper Dent 2001; 26:576-584.
21. Rios D, Honório HM, de Araújo PA, de Machado MA. Wear and superficial roughness of glass ionomer cements used as sealant, after simulated toothbrushing. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002; 16:343-348.
22. Jones DW, Jones PA, Wilson HJ. A simple abrasion test for composites. J Dent 1972; 1:28-34.
23. Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47:505-513.
24. Ehrnford L. Surface microstructure of composite resins after toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41:337-346.
25. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Surface texture changes of a composite brushed with "tooth whitening" dentifrices. Dent Mater 1996; 12:315-318.
26. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21:441-452.
27. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Quirynen M. The influence of direct composite additions for the correction of tooth form and/or position on periodontal health. A retrospective study. J Periodontol 1998; 69:422-427.
28. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppä L, Luoma H. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 1991; 25:454-458.
29. O'Brien WJ, Johnston WM, Fanian F, Lambert J. The surface roughness and gloss of composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:685-688.
30. Lindquist B, Emilson CG. Distribution and prevalence of mutans streptococci in the human dentition. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1160-1166.
31. Aker JR. New composite resins: comparison of their resistance to toothbrush abrasion and characteristics of abraded surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 105:633-635.
32. Harrington E, Jones PA, Fisher SE, Wilson HJ. Toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. Br Dent J 1982; 153:135-138.
33. O'Brien WJ, Yee J Jr. Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear. Oper Dent 1980; 5:90-94.
34. Grabenstetter RJ, Broge RW, Jackson FL, Radjke AW. The measurement of the abrasion of human teeth by dentifrice abrasives: a test utilizing radioactive teeth. J Dent Res 1958; 37:1060-1068.
35. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. The effect of dentifrices on restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1:47-54.
36. Goldstein GR, Lerner T. The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:498-500.
37. Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996; 21:53-58.
38. Jorgensen KD. Restorative resins: abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res 1980; 88:557-568.
39. De Boer P, Duinkerke ASH, Arends J. Influence of tooth paste particle size and tooth brush stiffness on dentine abrasion in vitro. Caries Res 1985; 19:232-239.
40. De Gee AJ, Harkel-Hagenaar HC, Davidson CL. Structural and physical factors affecting the brush wear of dental composites. J Dent 1985; 13:60-70.
41. Suzuki S. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995; 8:173-178.
42. Kawai K, Iwami Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:264-268.
43. Van Dijken JWV, Ruyter EI. Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing. Acta Odontol Scand 1987; 45:337-346.
44. Harte DB, Manly RS. Four variables affecting magnitude of dentifrice abrasiveness. J Dent Res 1976; 55:322-327.
45. International Standards Organization. Technical specification 14569-1. Dental materials - guidance on testing of wear resistance. Part 1: wear by tooth brushing. Switzerland: ISO, 1999.
46. Vieira DF. Studies on hardness and abrasion resistance of acrylic resins. Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1960.
47. Hengchang X, Tong W, Shiqing S. Wear patterns of composites restorative resins in vivo; observations by scanning electron microscopy. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12: 384-400.
48. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Analysis of composite type and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance. J Dent 2000; 28:355-359.
49. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998; 14:51-56.
50. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Joosten M, Veeke OV. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18:58-63.
51. Ernst CP, Buhtz C, Rissing C, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 2 years. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002; 23:711-717.
52. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001; 26:427-434.
53. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:148-155.
54. Oberlander H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:102-107.