Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 209-215

  Ulusoy, Çaöry ^a,b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental polishin; Orthodontic bracket debonding; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649949075     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brosh T, Kaufman A, Balabanovsky A, Vardimon A. In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods. J Biomech. 2005;38:1107-13.
2. Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:103-10.
3. Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L.The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19:214-24.
4. Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:333-8.
5. Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Çetinsahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resinremoval methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:314-21.
6. Hong YH, Lew KKK. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17:121-8.
7. Howell S, Weekes WT. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aust Dent J. 1990;35:245-52.
8. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:613-27.
9. Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing. Oper Dent. 2007;32:347-55.
10. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent. 1997;22:98-104.
11. Koh R, Neiva G, Dennison J, Yaman P. Finishing Systems on the Final Surface Roughness of Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;138- 45.
12. Radlanski RJ. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:296-304.
13. Retief DH, Denys FR. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthod. 1979;49:1-10.
14. Rouleau BD, Grayson WM, Cooley RO. Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:423-6.
15. Smith SC, Walsh LJ, Taverne AA. Removal of orthodontic bonding resin residues by CO2 laser radiation: surface effects. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17:13-8.
16. St Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, Mueller-Bolla M, Thompson JY, Stamatiades PJ. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent. 2005;30:593-7.
17. Sundfeld RH, Rahal V, Croll TP, De Alexandre RS, Briso AL. Enamel microabrasion followed by dental bleaching for patients after orthodontic treatment-case reports. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19:71-7.
18. Thomas BW, Hook CR, Draughn RA. Laser-aided degradation of composite resin. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:281-6.
19. Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2004;29:203-11.
20. Uçtasli MB, Arisu HD, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloölu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:89-96.
21. Uysal T, Eldeniz AU, Usumez S, Usumez A.Thermal changes in the pulp chamber during different adhesive clean-up procedures. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:220-5.
22. Wright GZ, Hatibovic-Kofman S, Millenaar DW, Braverman I. The safety and efficacy of treatment with air abrasion technology. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1999;9:133-40.
23. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/Polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2004;29:275-9.
24. Zachrisson BU, Artun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:121-37.
25. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:284-93.