The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 214-224

  Da Costa, Juliana ^a   Ferracane, Jack ^a   Paravina, Rade D ^b   Mazur, Rui Fernando ^c   Roeder, Leslie ^b,d  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 34547209251     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00104.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tyas MJ. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison. Aust Dent J 1992 37 : 88 90.
2. Yap AU. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2002 29 : 194 200.
3. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999 30 : 169 73.
4. Summit JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 2nd ed. Carol Stream, IL : Quintessence 2002, p. 237.
5. Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr., Rodrigues AL Jr. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 2000 13 : 136 8.
6. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes B. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003 134 : 1382 90.
7. St-Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, et al. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent 2005 30 : 593 7.
8. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004 29 : 275 9.
9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Rest Dent 2003 15 : 297 303.
10. Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004 17 : 262 6.
11. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004 29 : 203 11.
12. Dennison JB, Fan PL, Powers JM. Surface roughness of microfilled composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1981 102 : 859 62.
13. ASTM. Compilation of ASTM standard definitions. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA) : American Society of Testing and Materials 1982, p. 324.
14. O'Brien WJ, Johnston WM, Fanian F, Lambert S. The surface roughness and gloss of composites. J Dent Res 1984 63 : 685 8.
15. Stanford WB, Fan PL, Wozniak WT, Stanford JW. Effect of finishing on color and gloss of composites with different fillers. J Am Dent Assoc 1985 110 : 211 3.
16. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994 10 : 325 30.
17. Hondrum SO, Fernandez R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class V restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997 22 : 30 6.
18. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997 22 : 260 5.
19. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000 25 : 534 43.
20. Yap AU, Mok BY. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. Oper Dent 2002 27 : 161 6.
21. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after finishing and polishing procedures. J Biol Appl 2004 19 : 121 34.
22. Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1972 28 : 402 4.
23. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1980 43 : 542 5.
24. Dunkin RT, Chambers DW. Gingival response to Class V composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1983 106 : 482 4.
25. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, et al. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mat 1985 1 : 225 7.
26. Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. Philadelphia, PA : Elsevier Mosby 2004, pp. 42 4.
27. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, et al. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 11 : 169 78.
28. Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness restorations. Br Dent J 2004 196 : 42 5.
29. Strassler H. Polishing composite resins to perfection depends on the filler. Dent Off 1990 10 : 9 10.
30. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchinson DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002 27 : 243 7.
31. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Michel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992 68 : 742 9.
32. Toledano M, De La Torre FJ, Osorio R. Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites. Am J Dent 1994 7 : 328 30.
33. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, et al. Effect of polishing technique and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006 31 : 11 7.
34. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual book of ASTM standards: ASTM D523-89. Standard test method for specular gloss, vol 06. 01. West Conshohocken (PA) : ASTM 2001.
35. Alexander-Katz R, Barrera RG. Surface correlation effects on gloss. J Polym Sci [B 1998 36 : 1321.
36. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Surface texture (surface roughness, waviness, and lay), ASME B46.1-1995. New York : ASME 1996.