Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements

Journal of Voice

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 15-28

  Deliyski, Dimitar D ^a   Shaw, Heather S ^a   Evans, Maegan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic environment; Acoustic voice analysis; Data acquisition; Noise; Perturbation; Voice assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MICROPHONE; NOISE; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOICE;

EID: 14844304691     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. R.D. Kent, and M.J. Ball Voice Quality Measurement 2000 Singular Publishing Group San Diego, CA
2. R.J. Baken, and R.F. Orlikoff Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice 2nd ed. 2000 Singular Publishing Group San Diego, CA
3. R.D. Kent, H.K. Vorperian, and J.R. Duffy Reliability of Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the analysis of voice samples of subjects with dysarthria Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 8 2 1999 129 136
4. I.R. Titze Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement 1995 National Center for Voice and Speech Iowa City, IA
5. S.A. Xue, and D.D. Deliyski Effects of Aging on Selected Acoustic Voice Parameters: Preliminary Normative Data and Educational Implications Educ Gerontol 27 2001 159 168
6. R.C. Scherer, V.J. Vail, and C.G. Guo Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values J Speech Hear Res 38 6 1995 1260 1269
7. I.R. Titze, and H. Liang Comparison of Fo extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements J Speech Hear Res 36 6 1993 1120 1133
8. I.R. Titze, and W.S. Winholtz Effects of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements J Speech Hear Res 36 6 1993 1177 1190
9. D.R.-S. Ingrisano, C.K. Perry, and K.R. Jepson Environmental noise: a threat to automatic voice analysis Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 7 1 1998 91 96
10. C.K. Perry, D.R. Ingrisano, M.A. Palmer, and E.J. McDonald Effects of environmental noise on computer-derived voice estimates from female speakers J Voice 14 2 2000 146 153
11. C.P. Carson, D.R. Ingrisano, and K.D. Eggleston The effect of noise on computer-aided measures of voice: a comparison of CSpeechSP and the Multi- Dimensional Voice Program software using the CSL 4300B module and Multi-Speech for Windows J Voice 17 1 2003 12 20
12. Kay Elemetrics Corp Computerized Speech Lab (CSL) model 4400: Hardware Installation, Instruction and Maintenance Manual 2001 Kay Elemetrics Corp Lincoln Park, NJ
13. Deliyski, D. Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EuroSpeech'93, Berlin, Germany. 1993;3:1969-1972.
14. Kay Elemetrics Corp Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) model 5105, version 2.0: Software Instruction Manual 1999 Kay Elemetrics Corp Lincoln Park, NJ
15. Boersma, P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings from the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993;17:97-110.
16. P. Boersma, and V. van Heuven PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer Glot Int 5 9/10 2001 341 345
17. P. Milenkovic Least mean square measures of voice perturbation J Speech Hear Res 30 4 1987 529 538
18. P. Milenkovic TF32 User's Manual 2001 Paul Milenkovic Madison, WI