Computer navigated hip resurfacing for patients with abnormal femoral anatomy

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 159-163

  Olsen, Michael ^a   Schemitsch, Emil H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BONE NECROSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; MALE; PLATE FIXATION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; VARUS DEFORMITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEONECROSIS; OSTEOTOMY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649515091     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(9):1874-1877 (Pubitemid 39223453)
2. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):66-71. (Pubitemid 47494612)
3. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):463-464
4. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey F, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(1):28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
5. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
6. Freeman MA. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;(134):2-4. (Pubitemid 9047580)
7. McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2006;220(2):239-251
8. Amstutz HC, Su EP, Le Duff MJ. Surface arthroplasty in young patients with hip arthritis secondary to childhood disorders. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(2):223-30, x. (Pubitemid 40504000)
9. Boyd HS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, et al. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;(465):80-85
10. Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):339-346 (Pubitemid 46214353)
11. Mont MA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, et al. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J.Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 Suppl 3:45-51.
12. Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, et al. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct 30; Epub ahead of print.
13. Barrett AR, Davies BL, Gomes MP, et al. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2007;221(7):773-785
14. Cobb JP, Kannan V, Brust K, Thevendran G. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;(463):90-97 (Pubitemid 47585257)
15. Hess T, Gampe T, Kottgen C, Szawlowski B. [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing, methods and first results]. Orthopade. 2004;33(10):1183-1193 [German]
16. Romanowski JR, Swank ML. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):65-70.
17. Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, et al. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(4):557-560 (Pubitemid 46851142)
18. Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Gunther KP. Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; In press, Epub 5-17-2008.
19. Hart R, Svab P, Filan P. Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(4):429-434
20. Hodgson A, Helmy N, Masri BA, et al. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2007;221(7):713-724
21. Resubal JR, Morgan DA. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008; In Press, available online 2-13-2008.
22. Schnurr C, Michael JW, Eysel P, König DP. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy. Int Orthop. 2007; Dec 22 Epub ahead of print.
23. Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, et al. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 Suppl 3:71-80.
24. Beaulé PE, Amstutz HC. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1162.
25. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, et al. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;(465):71-79 (Pubitemid 350306496)
26. Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, et al. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(11):1522-1527
27. Markolf KL, Amstutz HC. Mechanical strength of the femur following resurfacing and conventional total hip replacement procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(147):170-180 (Pubitemid 10098154)
28. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk O, et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment, a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):96-101.
29. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Dominguez DE, et al. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1951-60.
30. Olsen M, Davis ET, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; In Press.
31. Papagelopoulos PJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG. Total hip arthroplasty with femoral osteotomy for proximal femoral deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(332):151-162 (Pubitemid 26372864)
32. Della Valle CJ., Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, et al. Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(12):2385-2390 (Pubitemid 37499649)
33. Holtgrewe JL, Hungerford DS. Primary and revision total hip replacement without cement and with associated femoral osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(10):1487-1495 (Pubitemid 20054464)
34. Paavilainen T, Hoikka V, Solonen KA. Cementless total replacement for severely dysplastic or dislocated hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):205-211 (Pubitemid 20087424)