Outcome Studies and Data Collection

Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 61-76

  Le Duff, Michel J ^a   Dorey, Frederick J ^b  

^a ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649563171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-4724-7.50011-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. W Harris (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 51A 737-755
2. N Bellamy, W Buchanan, C Goldsmith, J Campbell and L Stitt (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15 1833-1840
3. H Amstutz, B Thomas, R Jinnah, W Kim, T Grogan and C Yale (1984) Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 66A 228-241
4. R Merle d'Aubiné and M Postel (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36 451-475
5. J Dawson, R Fitzpatrick, D Murray and A Carr (1996) Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 5 81-88
6. J Ware, M Kosinski and S Keller (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 220-233
7. JJ Ware and C Sherbourne (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 473-483
8. C Jenkinson, R Layte, D Jenkinson, K Lawrence, S Petersen, C Paice and J Stradling (1997) A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 19 179-186
9. JG Wright, S Rudicel and AR Feinstein (1994) Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 229-234
10. P Beaulé, F Dorey, R Hoke, M Le Duff and H Amstutz (2006) The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 547-552
11. FJ Dorey and HC Amstutz (2002) The need to account for patient activity when evaluating the results of total hip arthroplasty with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A 709-710
12. J Feller, P Kay, J Hodgkinson and B Wroblewski (1994) Activity and socket wear in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9 341-345
13. TP Schmalzried, EF Shepherd, FJ Dorey, WO Jackson, M dela Rosa, F Fa'vae, HA McKellop, CD McClung, J Martell, JR Moreland and HC Amstutz (2000) The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop Rel Res 381 36-46
14. H Amstutz, P Beaulé, F Dorey, M Le Duff, P Campbell and T Gruen (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 86A 28-39
15. P Beaulé, F Dorey, M Le Duff, T Gruen and H Amstutz (2004) Risk factors affecting early outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip in patients 40 years old and younger. Clin Orthop Rel Res 418 87-93
16. H Amstutz, M Le Duff, P Campbell and F Dorey (2007) The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3-9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22 481-489
17. Amstutz H, Ball S, Le Duff M, Dorey F: Hip resurfacing for patients under 50 years of age. Results of 350 Conserve Plus with a 2-9 year follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res (in press) Epub ahead of print