From the Ivory Tower to the Marketplace: Knowledge organisations in the development of biotechnology clusters

Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 159-175

  Trippl, Michaela ^a   Tödtling, Franz ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH; SKILLED LABOR; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 67649452093     PISSN: 10904999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (89)

1. Archibugi, D. and B.-A. Lundvall, (eds). 2002. The Globalizing Learning Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Asheim, B. and M. Gertler. 2005. The geography of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291-317.
3. Audretsch, D. 2003. The role of small firms in US biotechnology clusters. In G. Fuchs (ed.), Biotechnology in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, pp 14-32.
4. Audretsch, D. and P. Stephan. 1996. Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 86, 641-652.
5. Austrian Council. 2005. Strategie 2010. Perspektiven für Forschung, Technologie und Innovation in Österreich. Weiterentwicklung des Nationalen Forschungs- und Innovationsplans, Vienna: Austrian Council, [http://www.ratfte.at/UserFiles/File/ Strategie2010.pdf].
6. BIT Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation and LISA Life Science Austria. 2004. Bio-Tech in Austria, Vienna: BIT and LISA.
7. Bower, J. 2003. Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management 33: 97-106.
8. Casper, S. and A. Karamanos. 2003. Commercializing science in Europe: The Cambridge Biotechnology Cluster. European Planning Studies 11: 805-823.
9. Casper, S. and F. Murray. 2005. Careers and clusters: analyzing the career network dynamic of biotechnology clusters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22: 51-74.
10. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Coenen, L. 2006. The role of universities in the regional innovation systems of the North East of England and Scania, Sweden: Providing missing links? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy (forthcoming).
12. Cooke, P. 2002. Knowledge Economies. Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. London: Routledge.
13. Cooke, P., C. de Laurentis, F. Tödtling, and M. Trippl. 2007. Regional Knowledge Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Cowan, R.C., P. David, and D. Foray. 2000. The explicit economies of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9: 212-253.
15. David, P. and D. Foray. 2003. Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. Policy Futures in Education 1: 20-49.
16. Drucker, P. 1998. From capitalism to knowledge society. In D. Neef (ed), The knowledge economy. Woburn, MA: Butterworth. Edquist, C. 2005. Systems of innovation - Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181-208.
17. Etzkowitz, H. 2004. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 1: 64-77.
18. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2"to a Tri ple Helix of university - industry - government relations. Research Policy 29: 109-123.
19. Etzkowitz, H. and M. Klofsten. 2005. 'The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management 35: 243-255.
20. Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B. Terra. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of the ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29: 313-330.
21. European Commission. 2003. Towards a European Research Area, Key Figures 2003-2004, Science, Technology and Innovation. Brussels: DG Research.
22. Feldman, M. and J. Francis. 2003. Fortune favors the prepared region: The case of entrepreneurship and the Capitol Region Biotechnology Cluster. European Planning Studies 11: 765-788.
23. Feldman, M. and J. Francis. 2004. Homegrown solutions: Fostering cluster formation. Economic Development Quarterly 18: 127-137.
24. Feldman, M., J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz. 2005. Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies 39: 129-141.
25. Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
26. Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Fritsch, M. 2003. Do regional systems of innovation matter? Freiberg Working Papers 03/2003, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg.
28. Fritsch, M. and C. Schwirten. 1999. Enterprise-university cooperation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation 6L: 69-83.
29. Fritsch, M. and C. Schwirten. 2002. R&D cooperation between public research institutions: Magnitude, motives and spatial dimension. In L. Schätzl and J. Revilla Diez (eds.), Technological Change and Regional Development in Europe, Heidelberg: Physica, pp. 199-210.
30. Fuchs, G. and G. Krauss. 2003. Biotechnology in comparative perspective. In G. Fuchs (ed.), Biotechnology in comparative perspective, London: Routledge, pp. 1-13.
31. Galambos, L. and J. Sewell. 1996. Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995, New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gertler, M. and Y. Levitte. 2005. Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation 12: 487-507.
33. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Sage: London.
34. Glaeser, E. 2004. Book Review of Florida's 'The rise of the Creative Class, [post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/glaeser/papers.html].
35. Glaeser, E. and A. Saiz. 2004. The rise of the skilled city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 47-94.
36. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras. 2000. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 20: 273-278.
37. Goncalves, M. and P. Papon. 2004. Introduction - Scientific and technological institutions and the new knowledge-based society: A European perspective. Minerva 42: 3-9.
38. Gunasekara, C. 2006. Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 101-113.
39. Keeble, D. 2000. Collective learning process in European high-technology milieux. In D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson (eds.), High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 199-229.
40. Keeble, D. and F. Wilkinson (eds). 2000. High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
41. Laestadius, S., 1998. Technology level, knowledge formation and industrial competence in paper manufacturing. In G. Eliasson and C. Green (eds.), Microfoundations of Economic Growth. A Schumpeterian Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 212-226.
42. Lawton Smith, H. and M. De Bernardy. 2000. University and public research institute links with high-technology SMEs. In D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson (eds.) High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 90-117.
43. Lehrer, M. and K. Asakawa. 2004. Pushing scientists into the marketplace: Promoting science entrepreneurship. California Management Review 46: 55-76.
44. Lerner, J. 2005. The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades. The Journal of Technology Transfer 30: 49-56.
45. Lockett, A., D. Siegel, M. Wright, and M. Ensley. 2005. The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy 34: 981-993.
46. Locket, A. and M. Wright. 2005. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy 34: 1043-1057.
47. Lucas, R. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42.
48. Lundvall, B. 2006. The university in the learning economy. DRUID Working Paper 02/06. Aalborg: University of Aalborg.
49. Lundvall, B.-A. and S. Borras. 1999. The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
50. Lynskey, M. 2006. The dismantling of redundant dichotomies: Biotechnology as an exemplar of university-industry collaboration. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 12: 127-147.
51. Martin, B. and A. Salter. 1996. The Relationship between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance: a SPRU Review, Report for HM Treasury. Sussex: University of Sussex-SPRU.
52. McKelvey, M. 2004. What about innovation collaboration in biotech firms? Revisiting occurrence and spatial distribution, biotech business. Working Paper No. 02-2004. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
53. Mehta, S. 2004. The emerging role of academia in commercializing innovation. Nature Biotechnology 22: 21-24.
54. Meyer, M. 2003. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management 33: 107-115.
55. Mowery, D., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2001. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30: 99-119.
56. Mowery, D. and B. Sampat. 2005. Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209-239.
57. Murray, F. 2002. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy 31: 1389-1403.
58. Murray, F. 2004. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy 33: 643-659.
59. Nelson, R. 2004. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy 33: 455-471.
60. Niosi, J. 2006. Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 451-457.
61. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
62. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. Introduction. "Mode 2′ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva 41: 179-194.
63. OECD. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD.
64. OECD. 2001. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD.
65. OECD. 2003. Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations. Paris: OECD.
66. Oosterwijk, H., S. Rossak, and B. Unger. 2003. Austrian biotechnology - Where to find on the map? In F. van Waarden (ed.), Bridging Ideas and Markets. National Systems of Innovation and the Organization of the Idea-Innovation Chain. Part II. Country-Sector reports. Final report of a project financed by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Program (Targeted Socio-Economic Research). Utrecht: Utrecht University, pp. 203-231.
67. O'Shea, R., T. Allen, A. Chevaliler, and F. Roche. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy 34: 994-1009.
68. Pavitt, K. 2005. Innovation processes. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 86-114.
69. Porter, K., K. Bunker Whittington, and W. Powell. 2005. The institutional embeddedness of high-tech regions: Relational foundations of the Boston biotechnology community. In S. Breschi and F. Malerba (eds.), Clusters, Networks, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261-296.
70. Powell, W. 1998. Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review 40: 228-240.
71. Powell, W., K. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145.
72. Rasmussen, E., O. Moen, and M. Gulbrandsen. 2006. Initiatives to promote the commercialisation of university knowledge. Technovation 26: 518-533.
73. Renault, C. 2006. Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 227-239.
74. Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: 71-102.
75. Rothaermel, F. and M. Thursby. 2005. Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Research Policy 34: 1076-1090.
76. Rothaermel, F. and D. Deeds. 2006. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 21: 429-460.
77. Schartinger, D., A. Schibany, and H. Gassler. 2001. Evidence of interactive relations between the academic sector and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 255-268.
78. Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M. Fischer, and J. Fröhlich. 2002. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31: 303-328.
79. Simpson, B. 2004. After the reforms: How have public science research organisations changed? R&D Management 34: 253-266.
80. Smith, K. 2002. What is the "Knowledge Economy"? Knowledge intensity and distributed knowledge bases. United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Discussion Paper Series, Maastricht.
81. Soete, L. 2002. The new economy: A European perspective. In D. Archibugi and B.-A. Lundvall (eds), The Globalizing Learning Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Tödtling, F. and M. Trippl. 2007. Knowledge links in high-technology industries: Markets, networks or Milieu? The case of the Vienna biotechnology cluster. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 7: 345-365.
83. Tödtling, F., P. Lehner, and M. Trippl. 2006. Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies 14: 1035-1058.
84. Trippl, M. and F. Tödtling. 2007. Developing biotechnology clusters in non-high technology regions - The case of Austria. Industry & Innovation 14: 47-67.
85. Trippl, M., J. von Gabain, and F. Tödtling. 2006. Policy agents as catalysts of knowledge links in the biotechnology sector. SRE-Discussion Paper 2006/01, Vienna: Institute of Regional Development and Environment, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.
86. Van Looy, B., K. Debackere, and P. Andries. 2003. Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration: An analysis and an assessment. R&D Management 33: 209-229.
87. Vincent-Lancrin, S. 2006. What is changing in academic research? Trends and future scenarios. European Journal of Education 41: 169-202.
88. Walter, A., M. Auer, and T. Ritter. 2006. The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing 21: 541-567.
89. Wright, M., A. Lockett, B. Clarysse, and M. Binks. 2006. University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy 35: 481-501.