A test and review of the role of effective population size on experimental sexual selection patterns

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1923-1933

  Snook, Rhonda R ^a   Brüstle, Lena ^a,b   Slate, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Effective population size; Experimental evolution; Genetic drift; Selection; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POPULATION SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; POPULATION DENSITY;

DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; NES;

EID: 67649435631     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00682.x     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Bacigalupe, L., H. S. Crudgington, F. Hunter, A. J. Moore, and R. R. Snook. 2007. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 1763 1771. (Pubitemid 47262863)
2. Bacigalupe, L., H. S. Crudgington, J. Slate, A. J. Moore, and R. R. Snook. 2008. Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseudoobscura mating behavior. Evolution 62 : 1804 1812. (Pubitemid 352000099)
3. Badcock, N. S. 2006. Reproductive conflict and sexual selection in insects. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield.
4. Bell, G. 1997a. Selection: the mechanism of evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
5. Bell, G. 1997b. The basics of selection. Chapman and Hall, New York.
6. Bennett, A. F., and R. E. Lenski. 1999. Experimental evolution and its role in evolutionary physiology. Am. Zool. 39 : 346 362.
7. e using temporal changes in allele frequencies: a genealogical approach. Genetics 160 : 741 751. (Pubitemid 34194543)
8. Blows, M. W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 1 8. (Pubitemid 44968143)
9. Bruford, M. W., O. Hanotte, and J. F. Y. Brookfield. 1998. Multilocus and single-locus DNA fingerprinting. Pp. 287 336 in A. R. Hoelzeol, ed. Molecular genetics analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, U.K.
10. Caballero, A. 1994. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73 : 657 679.
11. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
12. Crudgington, H. S., A. P. Beckerman, L. Brüstle, K. Green, and R. R. Snook. 2005. Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am. Nat. 16 : S72 S87.
13. Crudgington, H. S., S. Fellows, N. S. Badcock, and R. R. Snook. 2009. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution doi :.
14. Fricke, C., and G. Arnqvist. 2007. Rapid adaptation to a novel host in a seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus): the role of sexual selection. Evolution 61 : 440 454. (Pubitemid 46411619)
15. Hedrick, P. W. 2005. Genetics of populations. 3rd ed. Jones and Barlett, Boston, MA.
16. Holland, B., and Rice, W. R. (1999) Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 5083 5088. (Pubitemid 29214539)
17. Hosken, D. J., and P. I. Ward. 2001. Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol. Let. 4 : 10 13. (Pubitemid 32145264)
18. Hosken, D. J., T. W. J. Garner, and P. I. Ward. 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11 : 489 493. (Pubitemid 32305027)
19. Huey, R. B., L. Partridge, and K. Fowler. 1991. Thermal sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster responds rapidly to laboratory natural selection. Evolution 45 : 751 756.
20. LaMunyon, C. W., and S. Ward. 2002. Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 1125 1128. (Pubitemid 34628256)
21. LaMunyon, C. W., O. Bouban, and A. D. Cutter. 2007. Postcopulatory sexual selection reduces genetic diversity in experimental populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Hered. 98 : 67 72. (Pubitemid 47355532)
22. Lenski, R. E., M. R. Rose, S. C. Simpson, and S. C. Tadler. 1991. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138 : 1335 1341.
23. Linklater, J. R., B. Wertheim, S. Wigby, and T. Chapman. 2007. Ejaculate depletion patterns evolve in response to experimental manipulation of sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 61 : 2027 2034. (Pubitemid 47220937)
24. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Simauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
25. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423 : 979 982. (Pubitemid 36806911)
26. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2004. Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict. Curr. Biol. 14 : 906 910. (Pubitemid 38800913)
27. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
28. Noor, M. A. F., M. D. Schug, and C. F. Aquadro. 2000. Microsatellite variation in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genet. Res. Camb. 75 : 25 35. (Pubitemid 30135855)
29. Peel, D., J. Ovenden, and S. Peel. 2004. NeEstimator: software for estimating effective population size, version 1.3 pp. Queesland Government, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries.
30. Pitnick, S., G. T. Miller, J. Reagan, and B. Holland. 2001a. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1071 1080. (Pubitemid 32500481)
31. Pitnick, S., W. D. Brown, and G. T. Miller. 2001b. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268 : 557 563. (Pubitemid 32269843)
32. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
33. Reuter, M., J. R. Linklater, L. Lehmann, K. Fowler, T. Chapman, and G. D. D. Hurst. 2008. Adaptation to experimental alterations of the operational sex ratio in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62 : 401 412. (Pubitemid 351294563)
34. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 2005. Experimentally enforced monogamy: inadvertent selection, inbreeding, or evidence for sexually antagonistic' coevolution? Evolution 59 : 682 685. (Pubitemid 40441333)
35. Rodriguez-Ramilo, S. T., P. Moran, and A. Caballero. 2006. Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172 : 1043 1054. (Pubitemid 43345437)
36. Simmons, L. W., and F. Garcia-González. 2008. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles. Evolution 62 : 2580 2591.
37. Simmons, L. W., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 1998. Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. Pp. 341 434 in T. R. Birkhead, and A. P. Møller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, Lond.
38. Snook, R. R., A. Robertson, H. S. Crudgington, and M. G. Ritchie. 2005. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song. Behav. Genet. 35 : 245 255.
39. Tilszer, M., K. Antoszczyk, N. Salek, E. Zajac, and J. Radwan. 2006. Evolution under relazedd sexual conflict in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Evolution 60 : 1868 1873. (Pubitemid 44808237)
40. Turner, M. E., and W. W. Anderson. 1984. Multiple mating and female fitness in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 37 : 714 723.
41. es from data on genetic markers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 360 : 1395 1409. (Pubitemid 43138543)
42. Waples, R. S. 1989. A generalized-approach for estimating effective population-size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121 : 379 391. (Pubitemid 19052026)
43. Wigby, S., and T. Chapman. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58 : 1028 1037. (Pubitemid 38673790)
44. Wigby, S., and T. Chapman. 2006. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 1033 1039. (Pubitemid 43911515)