Evolution under relaxed sexual conflict in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1868-1873

  Tilszer, Magdalena ^a   Antoszczyk, Kinga ^a   Sałek, Natalia ^a   Zaja̧c, Ewelina ^a   Radwan, Jacek ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Acari; Antagonistic coevolution; Enforced monogamy; Experimental evolution; Mating systems; Sexual selection; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; MITE; POLYGAMY; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; MITE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; MITES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ACARI; MUSCIDAE; RHIZOGLYPHUS ROBINI;

EID: 33751329973     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-060.1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
3. _. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
5. Chapman, T., L. F. Liddie, J. M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-244.
6. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:41-47.
7. Crudgington, H. S., A. P. Beckerman, L. Brustle, K. Green, and R. Snook. 2005. Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: Does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females? Am. Nat. 165:S72-S87.
8. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
9. Friberg, U., and G. Arnqvist. 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16:797-811.
10. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
11. _. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5083-5088.
12. Hosken, D. J., T. W. J. Garner, and P. I. Ward. 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11:489-493.
13. Kołodziejczyk, M., and J. Radwan. 2003. The effect of mating frequency on female lifetime fecundity in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini (Acari: Acaridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53:110-115.
14. Konior, M., J. Radwan, and M. Kołodziejczyk. 2001. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55:1893-1896.
15. Kozielska, M., A. Krzeminska, and J. Radwan. 2004. Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:165-170.
16. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2003. Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. Evolution 57:2765-2772.
17. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sperm competition and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
18. Pitnick, S., and F. Garcia-Gonzalez. 2002. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1821-1828.
19. Pitnick, S., G. T. Miller, J. Reagan, and B. Holland. 2001. Evolutionary responses by males to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1071-1080.
20. Radwan, J. 1995. Male morph determination in two species of acarid mites. Heredity 74:669-673.
21. _. 1997. Sperm precedence in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini: context-dependent variation. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 9:373-383.
22. _. 2004. Effectiveness of sexual selection in removing mutations induced with ionizing radiation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1149-1154.
23. Radwan, J., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 1996. The function of postinsemination mate association in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Anim. Behav. 52:651-657.
24. Radwan, J., and W. Witaliński. 1991. Sperm competition. Nature 352:671-672.
25. Radwan, J., P. Watson, J. Farslow, and R. Thornhill. 2003. Pro-crustean analysis of fluctuating asymmetry in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini Claparede (Astigmata: Acaridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80:409-505.
26. Radwan, J., J. Unrug, K. Śnigórska, and K. Gawrońska. 2004. Effectiveness of sexual selection in preventing fitness deterioration in bulb mite populations under relaxed natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 17:94-99.
27. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
28. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 2005. Experimentally enforced monogamy: Inadvertent selection, inbreeding, or evidence for sexually antagonistic coevolution? Evolution 59:682-685.
29. Rowe, L. 1994. The cost of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48:1049-1056.
30. Snook, R. R. 2001. Sexual selection: conflict, kindness and chicanery. Curr. Biol. 11:R337-R341.
31. Wigby, S., and T. Chapman. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58:1028-1037.
32. Woodring, J. P., and J. J. Cutcher. 1968. Vital dye marking of tyroglyphid (Acaridae) mites. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61:1031-1032.