Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: Results and prognostic factors

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages

  Sinigaglia, Riccardo ^a   Bundy, Albert ^b   Costantini, Sandro ^a   Nena, Ugo ^a   Finocchiaro, Francesco ^a   Monterumici, Daniele A Fabris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b Boston Ultrasound Consult Pc   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Different levels; Prognostic factors; Results; Spine arthroplasty; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADICULITIS; SPINE SURGERY; TOTAL LUMBAR DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LENGTH OF STAY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SACRUM; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649197401     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0992-y     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. SJ Atlas RA Nardin 2003 Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: an evidence-based approach to clinical care Muscle Nerve 27 265 284 (Pubitemid 36255387)
2. R Bertagnoli S Kumar 2002 Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications Eur Spine J 11 S131 S136
3. Bertagnoli R, Marnay T, Mayer HM (eds) (2003) Total disc replacement. Spine Solutions GmbH, Tuttlingen
4. R Bertagnoli JJ Yue RV Shah R Nanieva F Pfeiffer A Fenk-Mayer T Kershaw DS Husted 2005 The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up Spine 30 2230 2236 (Pubitemid 41429207)
5. AR Block H Vanharanta DD Ohnmeiss RD Guyer 1996 Discographic pain report. Influence of psychological factors Spine 21 334 338 (Pubitemid 26055975)
6. S Blumenthal PC McAfee RD Guyer SH Hochschuler FH Geisler RT Holt R Garcia Jr JJ Regan DD Ohnmeiss 2005 A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes Spine 30 1565 1575 (Pubitemid 41024950)
7. SD Boden RA Balderston JG Heller EN Hanley Jr JE Zigler 2004 An AOA critical issue. Disc replacement: this time will we really cure low back and neck pain J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 411 422 (Pubitemid 38141581)
8. CM Bono CK Lee 2004 Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome Spine 29 455 463 (Pubitemid 38209722)
9. EJ Carragee CM Tanner B Yang JL Brito T Truong 1999 False-positive findings on lumbar discography. Reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection Spine 24 2542 2547 (Pubitemid 30002992)
10. EJ Carregee SJ Paragioudakis S Khurana 2000 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems Spine 25 2987 2992
11. J Cauchoix T David 1985 Arthrodeses lombaires: resultats apres plus de 10 ans Rev Chir Orthop 71 263 268 (Pubitemid 15041063)
12. DC Cherkin KJ Sherman RA Deyo PG Shekelle 2003 A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain Ann Intern Med 138 898 906 (Pubitemid 38124632)
13. SS Chung CS Lee CS Kang 2006 Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up J Spinal Disord Tech 19 411 415 (Pubitemid 44197592)
14. G Cinotti T David F Postacchini 1996 Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years Spine 21 995 1000 (Pubitemid 26127221)
15. T David 1993 Lumbar disc prosthesis Eur Spine J 1 254 259
16. T David 2005 Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis Eur Spine J 14 507 511 (Pubitemid 40922200)
17. T David 2007 Long term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty. Minimum 10-year follow-up of the Charité artificial disc in 106 patients Spine 32 661 666 (Pubitemid 46573305)
18. RB Delamarter DM Fribourg LE Kanim H Bae 2003 ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial Spine 28 S167 S175
19. RB Delamarter HW Bae BB Pradhan 2005 Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States Clinical Trial Orthop Clin North Am 36 301 313 (Pubitemid 40805091)
20. G Denoziere DN Ku 2006 Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc J Biomech 39 766 775 (Pubitemid 43139004)
21. AP Dooris VK Goel NM Grosland LG Gilbertson DG Wilder 2001 Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc Spine 26 E122 E129
22. BJ Freeman J Davenport 2006 Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature Eur Spine J 15 S439 S447
23. P Frelinghuysen RC Huang FP Girardi FP Cammisa Jr 2005 Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types Orthop Clin North Am 36 293 299 (Pubitemid 40805090)
24. P Fritzell O Hägg P Wessberg A Nordwall Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group 2001 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Spine 26 2521 2532
25. ® SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience Spine 19 1842 1849 (Pubitemid 24314197)
26. P Guigui P Lambert B Lassale A Deburge 1997 Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83 685 696 (Pubitemid 28026964)
27. Hagg O, Fritzell P (2004) Re: Brox JI, Sörensen R, Friis A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28:1913-1921.
28. Spine 29:1160-1161
29. M Hannibal DJ Thomas J Low KY Hsu J Zucherman 2007 ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up Spine 32 2322 2326 (Pubitemid 47508839)
30. RC Huang P Tropiano T Marnay FP Giradi MR Lim FPJ Cammisa 2006 Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement Spine J 6 242 247
31. MN Kumar A Baklanov D Chopen 2001 Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion Eur Spine J 10 314 319 (Pubitemid 32762776)
32. MN Kumar F Jacquot H Hall 2001 Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease Eur Spine J 10 309 313 (Pubitemid 32762775)
33. CK Lee 1988 Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion Spine 13 375 377 (Pubitemid 18160880)
34. RA Lehman Jr LG Lenke 2007 Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature Spine 32 E240 E245
35. JC Le Huec H Mathews Y Basso S Aunoble D Hoste B Bley T Friesem 2005 Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up Orthop Clin North Am 36 315 322 (Pubitemid 40805092)
36. JP Lemaire W Skalli F Lavaste A Templier F Mendes A Diop V Sauty E Laloux 1997 Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000 Clin Orthop Relat Res 337 64 76
37. HM Mayer K Wiechert 2002 Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement Neurosurgery 51 159 165 (Pubitemid 36324054)
38. PC McAfee IL Fedder S Saiedy EM Shucosky BW Cunningham 2003 SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center J Spinal Disord Tech 16 424 433
39. PC McAfee FH Geisler SS Saiedy SV Moore JJ Regan RD Guyer SL Blumenthal IL Fedder PJ Tortolani B Cunningham 2006 Revisability of the Charité artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the Charité artificial disc Spine 31 1217 1226 (Pubitemid 43756296)
40. C Mehren P Suchomel F Grochulla P Barsa P Sourkova J Hradil A Korge HM Mayer 2006 Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement Spine 31 2802 2806 (Pubitemid 44772781)
41. S Pai LJ Sundaram 2004 Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States Orthop Clin North Am 35 1 5 (Pubitemid 38153085)
42. Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2007) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8
43. JJ Regan 2005 Clinical results of Charité lumbar total disc replacement Orthop Clin North Am 36 323 340 (Pubitemid 40805093)
44. R Ross AH Mirza HE Norris M Khatri 2007 Survival and clinical outcome of SB Charité III disc replacement for back pain J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 785 789 (Pubitemid 47180199)
45. el-H SariAli JP Lemaire H Pascal-Mousselard H Carrier W Skalli 2006 In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long term results A 10-14 years follow-up evaluation Eur Spine J 15 1501 1510 (Pubitemid 44583663)
46. CJ Siepe HM Mayer K Wiechert A Korge 2006 Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc-II: three-year results for different indications Spine 31 1923 1932 (Pubitemid 44297772)
47. CJ Siepe HM Mayer M Heinz-Leisenheimer A Korge 2007 Total lumbar disc replacement. Different results for different levels Spine 32 782 790 (Pubitemid 46573332)
48. Siepe CJ, Korge A, Grochulla F, Mehren C, Mayer HM (2007) Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations. Eur Spine J doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0519-3
49. PJ Tortolani BW Cunningham M Eng PC McAfee GA Holsapple KA Adams 2007 Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 82 88 (Pubitemid 46059146)
50. P Tropiano RC Huang FP Girardi FP Cammisa Jr T Marnay 2005 Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 490 496 (Pubitemid 40314996)
51. JA Turner M Ersek L Herron J Haselkorn D Kent MA Ciol R Deyo 1992 Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions JAMA 268 907 911
52. J van Gijn RC van der Mast 2007 Chronic low back pain: the failure of organic medicine Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 151 1553 1556 (Pubitemid 47118408)
53. A van Ooij GW Schurink FC Oner AJ Verbout 2007 Findings in 67 patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 151 1577 1584 (Pubitemid 47118415)
54. WS Zeegers LM Bohnen M Laaper MJ Verhaegen 1999 Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients Eur Spine J 8 210 217 (Pubitemid 29287487)
55. JE Zigler TA Burd EN Vialle BL Sachs RF Rashbaum DD Ohnmeiss 2003 Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion J Spinal Disord Tech 16 352 361
56. JE Zigler 2004 Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II Spine J 4 S260 S267