Findings in 67 patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain;Bevindingen bij 67 patiënten met recidiverende of persisterende klachten na het plaatsen van een discusprothese wegens lage rugpijn

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 151, Issue 28, 2007, Pages 1577-1584

  Van Ooij, A ^a   Schurink, G W H ^a   Oner F C ^b   Verbout, A J ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SPONDYLODESIS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WIRE FIXATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BACK PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LEG; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 34547205603     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52: 157-68.
2. Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85: 317-32.
3. Roermund PM van, Plasmans CMT, Donk R, Öner FC, Kleuver M de, Ooij A van, et al. Orthopedisch wondermiddel. Med Contact. 2002; 57:670.
4. Öner FC, Kleuver M de, Ooij A van, Verbout AJ. De discusprothese: mythen en feiten. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002;146:1625-31.
5. Kleuver M de, Öner FC, Jacobs WCH. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:108-16.
6. Büttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H. Eine alternative Behandlungsstrategie beim lumbalen Bandscheibenschaden mit der Bandscheiben-endoprothese Modulartyp SB Charité. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1987;125:1-6.
7. Büttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H, Conrad P. Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse mit der lumbalen Zwischenwirbelendoprothese SB Charité. Z Klin Med. 1988;43:1785-9.
8. Büttner-Janz K, Schellnack K. Bandscheibenendoprothetik - Entwicklungsweg und gegenwartiger Stand. Beitr Orthop Traumatol. 1990;37:137-47.
9. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Büttner-Janz K, LeMaire JP, Zeegers WS. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine. 1994;19:1842-9.
10. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine. 1996;21:995-1000.
11. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(337):64-76.
12. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LMLJ, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:210-7.
13. David T. Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Spine J. 1993;1:254-9.
14. Sott AH, Harrison DJ. Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24:50-3.
15. David T. Lumbar disc prosthesis: five years follow-up study on 147 patients with 163 SB Charité prosthesis [abstract]. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(Suppl 1):S18.
16. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa jr FP, Marnay T. Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:490-6.
17. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565-75.
18. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1576-83.
19. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan- Klostermann C, et al. Charité total disc replacement - clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:183-95.
20. Khazim R, Boos N, Webb JK. Progressive thrombotic occlusion of the left common iliac artery after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:239-41.
21. Kulkarni SS, Lowery GL, Ross RE, Ravi Sankar K, Lykomitros V. Arterial complications following anterior lumbar interbody fusion: report of eight cases. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:48-54.
22. Marsicano J, Mirovsky Y, Remer S, Bloom N, Neuwirth M. Thrombotic occlusion of the left common iliac artery after an anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine. 1994;19:357-9.
23. Tiusanen H, Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Soini J. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior interbody lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J. 1995;4:339-42.
24. Gayer G, Caspi I, Garniek A, Hertz M, Apter S. Perirectal urinoma from ureteral injury incurred during spinal surgery mimicking rectal perforation on computed tomography scan. Spine. 2002;27: E451-3.
25. Hedman TP, Kostuik JP, Fernie GR, Hellier WG. Design of an intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine. 1991;16(6 Suppl):S256-60.
26. LeHuec JC, Kiaer T, Friesem T, Mathews H, Liu M, Eisermann L. Shock absorption in lumbar disc prosthesis: a preliminary mechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:346-51.
27. Cunningham BW, Lowery GL, Serhan HA, Dmitriev AE, Orbegoso CM, McAfee PC, et al. Total disc replacement arthroplasty using the AcroFlex lumbar disc: a non-human primate model. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(Suppl 2):S115-23.
28. Kostuik JP. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up of 2 years [letter]. Spine. 1996;21:1000.
29. White 3rd AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1978. p. 81.
30. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine. 2001;26:E122-9.
31. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2003;28:S110-7.
32. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, Setter JC, Dmitriev AE, Fedder IL. Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses: a nonhuman primate model. Spine. 2003;28:332-40.
33. Krismer M. Fusion of the lumbar spine. A consideration of the indications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:783-94.
34. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2002;27:1131-41.
35. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine. 1988;13:375-7.
36. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, Weinstein JN, Reinarz SJ, el-Khoury GY, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine. 1987;12:97-104.
37. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine. 1996;21:970-81.
38. Ooij A van, Öner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:369-83.
39. Mirza SK. Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine. 2005;30:1561-4.