Operations management of new project development: Innovation, efficient, effective aspects

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 797-809

  Lee, A H I ^a   Chen, H H ^b,d   Kang, H Y ^c  

^a CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Macao)

^c NATIONAL CHIN YI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^d NONE   (China)

Author keywords

Analytic network process; Benefits; Costs and risks; Feeder management systems; Knowledge management; Ppportunities

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; BENEFITS; DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS; KNOWLEDGE CREATIONS; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; PPPORTUNITIES;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 67449149291     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602605     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahn JH, Lee DJ and Lee SY (2006). Balancing business performance and knowledge performance of new product development. Long Range Plann 39: 525-542.
2. Armbrecht Jr. FMR, Chapas RB, Chappelow CC and Farris GF (2001). Knowledge management in research and development. Res Technol Mngt 44(4): 28-41.
3. Asrilhant B, Meadows M and Dyson R (2006). Techniques to support successful strategic project management in the UK. Eur Mngt J 24(2/3): 214-225.
4. Brown JS and Duguid P (2000). Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Org Sci 12(2): 198-213.
5. Dyer JH and Nobeoka K (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strat Mngt J 21(3): 345-367.
6. Earl JM (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
7. Erdoǧmuş S, Kapanoglu M and Koç E (2005). Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Eval Prog Plann 28: 391-399.
8. Erdoǧmus S, Aras H and Koc E (2006). Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making. Renew Sust Energy Rev 10: 269-279.
9. Fitzgerald G (1998). Evaluating information systems projects: A multidimensional approach. J Inform Technol 14: 17-30.
10. Hammer M, Leonard D and Davenport T (2004). Why don't we know more about knowledge? MIT Sloan Mngt Rev 45(4): 14-18.
11. Hochstrasser B and Griffiths C (1991). Controlling IT Investment: Strategy and Management. Chapman & Hall: London.
12. Hoegl M and Wagner SM (2005). Buyer-supplier collaboration in project development projects. J Mngt 31(4): 530-548.
13. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev January/February: 71-80.
14. Lee AHI (2008). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Syst Appl, in press, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045.
15. Leiponen A (2006). Managing knowledge for innovation: The case of business-to-business services. J Prod Innovat Mngt 23: 238-258.
16. Leung LC, Lam KC and Cao D (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process. J Opl Res Soc 57: 682-691.
17. Levinthal D and March JG (1993). The myopia of learning. Strat Mngt J 14: 95-112.
18. Levitt B and March JG (1988). Organizational learning. Ann Rev Sociol 14: 319-340.
19. Liu Y, Zhang P and Qiu X (2000). Optimal reactive power and voltage control for radial distribution system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2(1): 85-90.
20. March JG (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Org Sci 2: 71-87.
21. Matsuzawa K, Suzuki M, Okuhara Y and Kishida Y (1990). New energy management system for central dispatching center of Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5(4): 1112-1117.
22. Meredith JR and Hill MM (1987). Justifying new manufacturing systems: A managerial approach. Sloan Mngt Rev 28(4): 49-61.
23. Milis K and Mercken R (2004). The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects. Int J Proj Mngt 22: 87-97.
24. Mulebeke JAW and Zhang L (2006). Analytic network process for software selection in product development: A case study. J Eng Technol Mngt 23: 337-352.
25. Naveh E (2005). The effect of integrated product development on efficiency and innovation. Int J Prod Res 43(13): 2789-2808.
26. Nonaka I (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Org Sci 5(1): 14-37.
27. Nonaka I, Toyama R and Konno N (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Plann 33: 5-34.
28. Ozman M (2006). Knowledge integration and network formation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73: 1121-1143.
29. Rosenkopf L and Nerkar A (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strat Mngt J 22: 287-306.
30. Saaty RW (2003). Decision Making in Complex Environment: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. Super Decisions: Pittsburgh.
31. Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
32. Saaty TL (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh.
33. Saaty TL (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process - multiple networks with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(3): 348-379.
34. Salomo S, Weise J and Gemünden HG (2007). NPD planning activities and innovativeness performance: The mediating role of process management and moderating effect of product innovation. J Prod Innovat Mngt 24: 285-302.
35. Schulze A and Hoegl M (2006). Knowledge creation in new product development projects. J Mngt 32(2): 210-236.
36. Siggelkow N (2002). Evolution toward fit. Admin Sci Quart 47: 125-159.
37. Söderquist KE (2006). Organizing knowledge management and dissemination in new product development. Long Range Plann 39: 497-523.
38. Weick KE (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. McGraw Hill: New York.
39. Willcocks L and Lester S (1994). Evaluating the feasibility of information systems investments: Recent UK evidence and new approaches. In: Willcocks L (ed). Information Management: The Evaluation of Information Systems Investment. Chapman & Hall: London, pp 49-77.
40. Willcocks L and Lester S (1996). The evaluation and management of information systems investments: From feasibility to routine operations. In: Willcocks L (ed). Investing in Information Systems: Evaluation and Management. Chapman & Hall: London.
41. Winter S (1994). Organizing for continuous improvement: Evolutionary theory meets the quality revolution. In: Baum J and Singh J (eds). Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press: New York, pp 90-108.
42. Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A and Wu C (2006). Implementation of enterprise resource planning in China. Technovat 26: 1324-1336.