The effect of integrated product development on efficiency and innovation

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 43, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 2789-2808

  Naveh, E ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Innovation; Integrated product development (IPD); New product development (NPD)

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

INNOVATION; INTEGRATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (IPD); PARALLEL EXECUTION;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 27944438030     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540500031873     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adler, S.P., Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Org. Sci., 1995, 6, 147-167.
2. Adler, S.P., Goldoftas, B. and Levin, D.I., Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Org. Sci., 1999, 10, 43-68.
3. Ahmad, S. and Schroeder, R.G., The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences. J. Op. Manage., 2003, 21, 19-43.
4. Ahn, H. and Dyckhoff, H., A flexible concept for decision support: Evaluation and selection of suitable product development activities. Euro. J. Oper. Res., 1997, 100, 266-276.
5. Amabile, T.M., Hadley, C.N. and Kramer, S.J., Creativity under the gun. Harv. Bus. Rev., 2002, 80, 52-61.
6. Argote, L., Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, 1999 (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA).
7. Baldrige National Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, MD, 2001.
8. Benner, M.J. and Tushman, M., Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart., 2002, 47, 676-706.
9. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M., The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1997, 42, 1-34.
10. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M., Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos, 1998 (Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA).
11. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Quart., 1990, 35, 128-143.
12. Cortina, J.M., What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. App. Psych., 1993, 78, 98-104.
13. Damanpour, F., Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinates. Acad. Manage. J., 1991, 34, 555-591.
14. Ding, M. and Eliashberg, J., Structuring the new product development pipeline. Manage. Sci., 2002, 48, 343-363.
15. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Tabrizi, B.N., Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1995, 40, 84-111.
16. Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. and Sakakibara, S., A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J. Op. Manage., 1994, 11, 339-366.
17. Gatignon, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W. and Anderson, P., A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, types, and characteristics. Manage. Sci., 2002, 48, 1103-1122.
18. Gerwin, D. and Barrowman, N.J., An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science, 2002, 48, 938-953.
19. Glynn, M.A., Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1996, 21, 1081-1112.
20. Griffin, A., PDMA research on new product development practices. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 1997, 14, 429-458.
21. Hackman, J.R. and Wageman, R., Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1995, 40, 309-342.
22. Harris, M. and Raviv, A., Organization design. Manage. Sci., 2002, 48, 852-865.
23. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G. and Wolf, G., Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych., 1984, 78, 306-309.
24. Katz, R., The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1982, 27, 81-104.
25. Kennedy, N.M. and Ward, A., Product Development for the Lean Enterprise: Why Toyota's System is Four Times More Productive and How You Can Implement It. 2003 (The Oaklea Press: Place).
26. Klien, K.J. and Sorra, J.S., The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1996, 21, 1055-1081.
27. Koufteros, A.X., Vonderembse, M.A. and Doll, W.J., Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: The effect of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. J. Op. Manage., 2002, 20, 331-355.
28. Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G., The myopia of learning. Strat. Manage. J. 1993, 14, 95-112.
29. Lewis, M.W., Welsh, M.A., Dehler, G.E. and Green, S.G., Product development tension: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad. Manage. J., 2002, 45, 546-564.
30. Liker, K.J., The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer, 2003 (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY).
31. Marcus, A., Implementing externally induced innovations: A comparison of rule-bound and autonomous approaches. Acad. Manage. J., 1988, 31, 235-257.
32. Mirone, E., Erez, M., and Naveh, E., Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J. Organ. Behav., 2004, 25, 175-199.
33. Mukherjee, A.S., Lapr'e, M.A. and Van Wassenhove, L.N., Knowledge driven quality improvement. Manage. Sci., 1998, 44, S35-S49.
34. Nohria, N. and Gulati, R., Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Manage. J., 1996, 39, 1245-1264.
35. Nunnally, J., Psychometric Theory, Third edn, 1994 (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY).
36. Nutt, P.C., 1986, Tactics of implementation. Acad. Manage. J., 29, 230-261.
37. O'Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J. and Cardwell, D.F., People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Manage. J., 1991, 14, 487-516.
38. Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R. and Turner, C., Dimensions of organization structure. Admin. Sci. Quart., 1968, 13, 65-105.
39. Prahalad, C.K. and Krishnan, M.S., The new meaning of quality in the information age, Harvard Business Review, September/October 1999, pp. 109-118.
40. Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A., Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Acad. Manage. J., 1994, 37(3), 580-607.
41. Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A.N. and Subirats, M., Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. J. Appl. Psych., 2002, 87, 220-229.
42. Sitkin, S.B., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Schroeder, R.G., Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1994, 19, 537-564.
43. Song M. and Montoya-Weiss, M.M., The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Acad. Manage. J., 2001, 44, 61-80.
44. Tatikonda, M.V. and Rosenthal, S.R., Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. J. Op. Manage., 2000, 18, 401-425.
45. Van de Ven, A. and Polley, H.D., Learning while innovating. Organ. Sci., 1992, 3, 92-116.
46. Van de Ven, A.H., Polley, E.D., Garud, R. and Venkataraman, S., The Innovation Journey, 1999 (Oxford University Press: New York, NY).