Clinical investigation of asmofilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 350-356

  Lakkis, Carol ^a,b   Vincent, Stephen ^a  

^a Victorian College of Optometry   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Asmofilcon A; Contact lenses; Extended wear; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EVENTS; ASMOFILCON A; CLINICAL INVESTIGATION; EXTENDED WEAR; EXTENDED WEARS; LENS PERFORMANCE; LOW CONTRAST; SILICONE HYDROGEL; SILICONE HYDROGELS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SUBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE; THIRD GENERATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTACT LENSES; HYDROGELS; SILICONES; VISION;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

SILICONE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONJUNCTIVA DISEASE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PALPEBRAL CONJUNCTIVAL INJECTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RED EYE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STANDARD;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SILICONES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67449084171     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819b385c     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Morgan PB, Efron N. Patterns of prescribing extended wear contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008;31:167-169
2. Efron N, Morgan PB. Trends in the use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008;31:242-243
3. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:942-948 (Pubitemid 27410079)
4. Steffen RB, Schnider CM. The impact of silicone hydrogel materials on overnight corneal swelling. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:115-120
5. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002;25:137-146
6. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JK, Brian G, Holden BA. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1655-1662
7. Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647-1654
8. Efron N, Morgan PB, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB. The size, location, and clinical severity of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:519-527 (Pubitemid 40911491)
9. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn J, Gilmartin B. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:35-38
10. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-46 (Pubitemid 30074351)
11. Bergenske P, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr JT, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J, Chalmers RL. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:74-80. (Pubitemid 46941165)
12. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:281-286 (Pubitemid 44747202)
13. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:516-527 (Pubitemid 41711112)
14. Schlanger JL. A study of contact lens failures. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64:220-224
15. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1319-1328
16. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials - how do they work? In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels - The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000: 1-21.
17. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
18. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79:444-454
19. Stiegemeier MJ, Friederichs GJ, Hughes JL, Larsen S, Movic W, Potter WB. Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:143-151 (Pubitemid 43923663)
20. Carnt N. Third Generation Silicone Hydrogel Lenses. 2008. Available at: http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/08-may.asp. Accessed July 28, 2008.
21. Szczotka-Flynn L. Looking at silicone hydrogels across generations. Optom Manag 2008;43:68-71.
22. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Schnider CM, Efron N. Shortterm physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:911-921 (Pubitemid 39657375)
23. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Connor HR, McIlroy RG. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:108-118
24. Lakkis C, Weidemann K. Clinical performance of a new non-surface treated silicone hydrogel lens over 12 months of continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:183.
25. Ousler GW III, Anderson RT, Osborn KE. The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:335-341
26. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:182-186 (Pubitemid 28132673)
27. Newcombe RG, Duff GR. Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:645-646
28. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:412-420 (Pubitemid 30656136)
29. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Rubido-Crespo MJ. The clinical investigation of the base curve and comfort rate of a new prototype silicone hydrogel contact lens. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:146-150 (Pubitemid 351655678)
30. Szczotka-Flynn L, Diaz M. Risk of corneal inflammatory events with silicone hydrogel and low dk hydrogel extended contact lens wear: a meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:247-256 (Pubitemid 46624849)
31. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascues E, Rubido-Crespo MJ, Sugimoto K, Sawano T. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008;28:373-381 (Pubitemid 351863588)
32. King-Smith PE, Fink BA, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK, Hill RM. Interferometric imaging of the full thickness of the precorneal tear film. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2006;23:2097-2104
33. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-124
34. Rolando M, Iester M, Macri A, Calabria G. Low spatial-contrast sensitivity in dry eyes. Cornea 1998;17:376-379 (Pubitemid 28307502)
35. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-197
36. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La Hood D, Back A. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:234-243 (Pubitemid 23174863)