Implicit online corrections of reaching movements

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 558-564

  Gomi, Hiroaki ^a,b  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY MOVEMENT; CONSCIOUSNESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VISION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 67349232318     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.11.002     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Carlton L.G. Processing visual feedback information for movement control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7 (1981) 1019-1030
2. Soechting J.F., and Lacquaniti F. Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49 (1983) 548-564
3. Day B.L., and Lyon I.N. Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 130 (2000) 159-168
4. Goodale M.A., Pelisson D., and Prablanc C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320 (1986) 748-750
5. Prablanc C., and Martin O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67 (1992) 455-469
6. Prablanc C., Pelisson D., and Goodale M.A. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb: I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res 62 (1986) 293-302
7. Gosselin-Kessiby N., Messier J., and Kalaska J.F. Evidence for automatic on-line adjustments of hand orientation during natural reaching movements to stationary targets. J Neurophysiol 99 (2008) 1653-1671
8. Sarlegna F.R. Impairment of online control of reaching movements with aging: a double-step study. Neurosci Lett 403 (2006) 309-314
9. Pisella L., Grea H., Tilikete C., Vighetto A., Desmurget M., Rode G., Boisson D., and Rossetti Y. An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3 (2000) 729-736
10. Rossetti Y., Pisella L., and Vighetto A. Optic ataxia revisited: visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Exp Brain Res 153 (2003) 171-179
11. Rossetti Y., Revol P., McIntosh R., Pisella L., Rode G., Danckert J., Tilikete C., Dijkerman H.C., Boisson D., Vighetto A., et al. Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 162-177. This study demonstrated that patients with optic ataxia exhibited increased errors in an immediate pointing task, in which eye fixation was hard to be shifted to a new target. The performance was improved by a delay pointing task in which fixation could be adjusted to the new target in advance. In an additional experiment, the patients tended to start pointing toward a previewed target rather than toward a new target, suggesting that they relied on off-line information because of a disruption of quick visuomotor transformation mechanisms.
12. Blangero A., Gaveau V., Luaute J., Rode G., Salemme R., Guinard M., Boisson D., Rossetti Y., and Pisella L. A hand and a field effect in on-line motor control in unilateral optic ataxia. Cortex 44 (2008) 560-568
13. Prado J., Clavagnier S., Otzenberger H., Scheiber C., Kennedy H., and Perenin M.T. Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron 48 (2005) 849-858. This study showed, by an event-related fMRI, that reaching toward the central visual field activates the medial intraparietal sulcus and the caudal part of the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), and that reaching toward the peripheral visual field activates additional areas: the parietoooccipital junction and more rostral part of the PMd.
14. Pettersson L.G., Lundberg A., Alstermark B., Isa T., and Tantisira B. Effect of spinal cord lesions on forelimb target-reaching and on visually guided switching of target-reaching in the cat. Neurosci Res 29 (1997) 241-256
15. Alstermark B., Gorska T., Lundberg A., Pettersson L.G., and Walkowska M. Effect of different spinal cord lesions on visually guided switching of target-reaching in cats. Neurosci Res 5 (1987) 63-67
16. Day B.L., and Brown P. Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching. Brain 124 (2001) 1832-1840
17. Desmurget M., Epstein C.M., Turner R.S., Prablanc C., Alexander G.E., and Grafton S.T. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2 (1999) 563-567
18. Tunik E., Frey S.H., and Grafton S.T. Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8 (2005) 505-511
19. Glover S., Miall R.C., and Rushworth M.F. Parietal rTMS disrupts the initiation but not the execution of on-line adjustments to a perturbation of object size. J Cogn Neurosci 17 (2005) 124-136
20. Fukui T., and Inui T. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. Hum Mov Sci 25 (2006) 349-371
21. Wolpert D.M., Miall C., and Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2 (1998) 338-347
22. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9 (1999) 718-727
23. Desmurget M., and Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4 (2000) 423-431
24. Sarlegna F., Blouin J., Vercher J.L., Bresciani J.P., Bourdin C., and Gauthier G.M. Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 157 (2004) 468-471
25. Bard C., Turrell Y., Fleury M., Teasdale N., Lamarre Y., and Martin O. Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Exp Brain Res 125 (1999) 410-416
26. van Donkelaar P., Lee J.H., and Drew A.S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts eye-hand interactions in the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 84 (2000) 1677-1680
27. Battaglia-Mayer A., Archambault P.S., and Caminiti R. The cortical network for eye-hand coordination and its relevance to understanding motor disorders of parietal patients. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2607-2620
28. Gaveau V., Pelisson D., Blangero A., Urquizar C., Prablanc C., Vighetto A., and Pisella L. Saccade control and eye-hand coordination in optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 46 (2008) 475-486
29. Mohrmann-Lendla H., and Fleischer A.G. The effect of a moving background on aimed hand movements. Ergonomics 34 (1991) 353-364
30. Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J Mot Behav 29 (1997) 297-310
31. Whitney D., Westwood D.A., and Goodale M.A. The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature 423 (2003) 869-873. This study examined the visual motion effect on reaching movements in an analogy to illusory positional shift of visual objects. The authors also suggested a dissociation between perception and action, based on the difference in the time courses of the effects investigated by a motion reversal paradigm.
32. Saijo N., Murakami I., Nishida S., and Gomi H. Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 4941-4951. This study provided several experimental results which argue against the hypotheses that the quick manual response evoked by sudden visual motion during arm reaching is ascribed to an eye-hand motor linkage or to a shifted target representation.
33. Gomi H., Abekawa N., and Nishida S. Spatiotemporal tuning of rapid interactions between visual-motion analysis and reaching movement. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 5301-5308. This study showed that the MFR is greatly modulated by the visual motion characteristics, such as image contrast and spatiotemporal frequency. High sensitivity of the MFR in the low-contrast range was similar to those of MT neurons. The tuning peak of the MFR at very low spatial frequency and high temporal frequency was similar to those of neurons in MST and the OFR.
34. Masson G., Proteau L., and Mestre D.R. Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans. Vision Res 35 (1995) 837-852
35. Whitney D., and Cavanagh P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nat Neurosci 3 (2000) 954-959
36. Miles F.A., Kawano K., and Optican L.M. Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey: I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. J Neurophysiol 56 (1986) 1321-1354
37. Kawano K., and Miles F.A. Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey: II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. J Neurophysiol 56 (1986) 1355-1380
38. Henriques D.Y., Klier E.M., Smith M.A., Lowy D., and Crawford J.D. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18 (1998) 1583-1594
39. Henriques D.Y., Medendorp W.P., Gielen C.C., and Crawford J.D. Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head. Exp Brain Res 152 (2003) 70-78
40. Gomi H., and Abekawa N. Distinct visual motion analyses for online quick arm and eye controls. The Society for Neuroscience 37th Annual Meeting (2007), Society for Neuroscience, San Diego
41. Kawano K., Shidara M., Watanabe Y., and Yamane S. Neural activity in cortical area MST of alert monkey during ocular following responses. J Neurophysiol 71 (1994) 2305-2324
42. Masson G.S., Yang D.S., and Miles F.A. Reversed short-latency ocular following. Vision Res 42 (2002) 2081-2087
43. Shidara M., Kawano K., Gomi H., and Kawato M. Inverse dynamics model eye movement control by Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. Nature 365 (1993) 50-52
44. Kawano K., Shidara M., and Yamane S. Neural activity in dorsolateral pontine nucleus of alert monkey during ocular following response. J Neurophysiol 67 (1992) 680-703
45. Gomi H., Shidara M., Takemura A., Inoue Y., Kawano K., and Kawato M. Temporal firing patterns of purkinje cells in the cerebellar ventral paraflocculus during ocular following responses in monkeys: I. Simple spikes. J Neurophysiol 80 (1998) 818-831
46. Takemura A., Inoue Y., Gomi H., Kawato M., and Kawano K. Change in neuronal firing patterns in the process of motor command generation for the ocular following responses. J Neurophysiol 86 (2001) 1750-1763
47. Takemura A., Murata Y., Kawano K., and Miles F.A. Deficits in short-latency tracking eye movements after chemical lesions in monkey cortical areas MT and MST. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 529-541. This paper showed that three types of quick ocular responses induced by linear motion, radial motion, and binocular parallax were significantly impaired by chemical lesions in area MT/MST, suggesting shared motion analyses for these quick ocular responses. These areas could also be involved in the motion analysis for a quick manual response elicited by a sudden visual motion.
48. Whitney D., Ellison A., Rice N.J., Arnold D., Goodale M., Walsh V., and Milner D. Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+. Cereb Cortex (2007). The authors demonstrated that the manual response induced by motion after-effects can be extinguished by a TMS over visual motion area MT+. Since the authors evaluated the responses by end position, it is still unclear whether the response is generated with short latency, as the MFR introduced in this review is.
49. Veerman M.M., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Exp Brain Res (2008). The authors showed the differences between initial phases of the reaching corrections to the transient changes of target location indicated by several visual attributes. The responses for the attributes of color, form, and texture are 50 ms slower than for the attributes of luminance, orientation, and size, suggesting distinct processing pathways.
50. Yamagishi N., Anderson S.J., and Ashida H. Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268 (2001) 973-977